[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-503550-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-503550-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","comparative-financial-statistics-for-public-two-year-colleges-fiscal-year-1998","Comparative Financial Statistics for Public Two-Year Colleges - Fiscal Year 1998","","Comparative Financial Statistics for Public Two-Year Colleges for Fiscal Year 1998 summarizes financial and related statistics for public community colleges using a national sample of 252 institutions. The report stems from an intensive six-month study and includes data from fiscal year 1997-98 alongside explanations drawn from two national surveys. Key findings highlight average revenues per credit FTE, student tuition and fee payments, per-student spending, expenditure allocation, staffing ratios, and faculty part-time shares.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparative-financial-statistics-for-public-two-year-colleges-fiscal-year-1998/503550/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparative-financial-statistics-for-public-two-year-colleges-fiscal-year-1998/503550.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"mieayamfan","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-15","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the scope and purpose of this report?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It provides comparative financial and other statistics for public two-year colleges based on a national sample of 252 institutions, aiming to inform administrators, state and local agencies, and federal policy makers.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Which fiscal year does the report cover?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The report provides financial statistics for fiscal year 1997-98, presented under the FY1998 comparative study.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What types of findings and metrics are included?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It reports statistics such as mean revenues per credit FTE, student tuition and fee amounts, spending per credit FTE, expenditure allocations, staffing ratios, and the share of part-time instructional faculty, along with participating college listings.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},503550,1791136497,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090893677,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","ED 455891  \nAUTHOR  \nTITLE  \nINSTITUTION  \nSPONS AGENCY  \nPUB DATE  \nNOTE  \nPUB TYPE  \nEDRS PRICE  \nDESCRIPTORS  \nABSTRACT  \nDOCUMENT RESUME  \nDouglas,Brian;Harmening,Todd  \nComparative Financial Statistics for Public Two-YearColleges:Fiscal Year 1998.  \nNational Association of Coll.and Univ.Business Officers,Washington,DC.  \nTeachers Insurance and Annuity Association,New York,NY.College Retirement Equities Fund.  \n1999-09-00  \n41p.;Project in cooperation with the American Associationof Community Colleges,the Association of Community CollegeTrustees,and the National Center for Education Statistics.Funded in part by TIAA-CREF Community College ScholarshipFund.  \nNumerical/Quantitative Data(110)--Reports -Research(143)  \nMF01/PC02 Plus Postage.  \n*Community Colleges;Comparative Analysis;EducationalEconomics;*Educational Finance;*Financial Policy;*Institutional Characteristics;National Norms;NationalSurveys;*Operating Expenses;Program Costs;*Statistics;Tables(Data);Two Year Colleges;Unit Costs  \nThis report,from the National Association of College andUniversity Business Officers!(NACUBO),is the nineteenth in a series ofcomparative data studies of public two-year colleges.A result of anintensive six-month study involving 252 community colleges,it containsfinancial and other statistics for fiscal year 1997-98.Report.highlightsinclude:(1)mean revenues per credit full-time-equivalent(FTE)student was  \n$6,254(tuition and fees,appropriations,gifts,grants,contracts,andother);(2)on average,students paid $1,783 in tuition and fees;(3)  \nstudents spent approximately $6,208 per credit FTE student;(4)at the mediancollege,62%of all expenditures were directed to academic programs,and 50%of expenditures to instruction alone;(5)institutions averaged one creditinstructional staff member for every 19 credit FTE students,one counselingand career guidance staff member for every 434 credit FTE students,and oneinstitutional support staff member for every 81 credit FTE students;(6)onaverage,41%of credit instructional faculty FTEs were part-time;and(7)institutions employed 113 staff members per 1,000 credit FTE students.Thereport contains a list of all 252 participating community colleges.(NB)  \n\n| Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made  \u003Cbr>from the original document.   |\n| --- |\n\nED 455  \n1S.DEPABTMENT QF EDUCATIONMic    E  GAti⁰al Besasch and lmorovementEDUCATIONAL BESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER(ERIC)  \nCOThis document has been reproduced asrocoived from the person or oraanizationoriginating it  \n□ Minor changes have been made tc  \nimprove reproduction quality  \nPoints of view or opinions stated in this  \ndocumeot do not necessarily reoresent  \nofficial OERI position or policy  \nPERMISSION TO REPRODUCEAND  \nDISSEMINATE THIS MATERLAL HAS  \nBEENGRANTED BY  \nD.Kling  \nTO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES  \nINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)  \n1  \n了Co10571  \nComparativeFinancialStatistics  \nfor Public  \nTwo-YearColleges:FY1998NationalSample  \nA Nalional Association ofCollegc and University BusiDcssOIfcers”(NACUBO)Project inCoopernation with tlee AmericanAssociation of CommunityColleges,the Association ofComnunity College Trusteesand the National Cencer forEducation Statistics  \nFinxhed ir pawy bu dire TIAA  \nBE Carsinrin ColegeolarsiripFwnd  \nComparative Financial StatisticsFor Public Two-Year Colleges:  \nFiscal Year 1998  \nBy  \nBrian Douglas  \nTodd Harmening  \nNACUBO  \nSeptember 1999  \nWashington,D.C.  \nCopyright ◎1999 by NACUBO  \nAll rights reserved.No part of this publication may be reproducedor transmitted in any form or by any means,electronic ormechanical,including photocopying,recording,or by anyinformation storage and retrieval system,without permissionin writing from the publisher.  \nNational Association of Collegeand University Business OfficersWashington,DCwww.nacubo.org  \n7  \nCONTENTS  \nPreface  \nAcknowledgments  \nIntroduction  \nBackgroundObjectivesDistributionDatabase  \nSpecial Analysis ServicePotential Uses  \nLimitations and Explanations ","cbCaif7ed7dKZpEI","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaif7ed7dKZpEI","pdf",446888,22,"English","# Preface\n# Acknowledgments\n# Introduction\n# Background\n# Objectives\n# Distribution\n# Database\n# Special Analysis Service\n# Potential Uses\n# Limitations and Explanations\n# Extrapolation\n# Original Data\n# Institutional Comparability\n# The Myth of the \"Typical\" Institution\n# Calculations\n# Interpretation of Proportions\n# Medians and Quartiles\n# Means\n# Definitions\n# Revenues\n# Expenditures\n# Staffing\n# Appendix: Participating Colleges","[{\"question\":\"What is the scope and purpose of this report?\",\"answer\":\"It provides comparative financial and other statistics for public two-year colleges based on a national sample of 252 institutions, aiming to inform administrators, state and local agencies, and federal policy makers.\"},{\"question\":\"Which fiscal year does the report cover?\",\"answer\":\"The report provides financial statistics for fiscal year 1997-98, presented under the FY1998 comparative study.\"},{\"question\":\"What types of findings and metrics are included?\",\"answer\":\"It reports statistics such as mean revenues per credit FTE, student tuition and fee amounts, spending per credit FTE, expenditure allocations, staffing ratios, and the share of part-time instructional faculty, along with participating college listings.\"}]","Comparative Financial Statistics for Public Two-Year Colleges - Fiscal Year 1998 | PDF",1791057942,55]