[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-123556-en":3,"doc-seo-123556-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},123556,7971461741311,"Ophelia","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/74000253aff267980c6?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779345379180704826",8,"Research & Report","Comparative Analysis of Traditional Time Series, Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Models for Profit Forecasting in Financial Markets","This thesis compares the forecasting accuracy of traditional time series, machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models for daily banking profit data in financial markets, aggregated at three levels. Method comparison uses a novel corrected mean average scaled error (cMASE) that improves interpretability over MASE by changing the one-step naive baseline so the naive benchmark consistently scores cMASE=1. Results show SARIMA as the most consistent performer, while hybrid approaches refine forecasts via long lags and rolling statistics with reduced refitting costs.","University of Tartu  \nFaculty of Science and Technology  \nInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics  \nWilliam Vaask  \nComparative Analysis of Traditional Time Series, Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Models for Profit Forecasting in Financial Markets  \nActuarial and Financial Engineering  \nMaster’s Thesis (30 ECTS)  \nSupervisor: Prof. Toomas Raus  \nAEGRIDADE LINEAARSETE, MASINÕPPE, SÜVAÕPPE JAHÜBRIID MUDELITE VÕRDLEV ANALÜÜS KASUMI PROGNOOSIMISEL FINANTSTURGUDEL  \nMagistritöö  \nWilliam Vaask  \nLühikokkuvõte  \nTöös võrreldi lineaarsete, masinõppe, sügavõppe ja hübriid mudelite aegridade prognoositäpsust panganduses finantsturgude valdkonnas, prognoosideskolmel erineval tasemel agregeeritud igapäevast kasumit. Erinevate meetoditevõrdlemiseks kasutati uut jõudlusmõõdikut-korrigeeritud keskmine skaleeritud absoluutviga (cMASE), mis parandab MASE tõlgendatavust, kasutades T ühe-sammu naiivset prognoosi T − 1 asemel, mille tulemusel on naiivse meetodi skoor alati cMASE = 1 .  \nVaatamata arvutusvõimsuse arengust tingitud võimalikele mudelitele, oli lineaarne aegreamudel SARIMA teistest mudelitest parem, näidates kõige järjepidevamaid tulemusi keskmise ristvalideerimise cMASE ja testimise cMASEvahel erinevate aegridadega.  \nParimates hübriidmudelites täiendasid gradiendi võimenduse meetodid SARIMAt, parandades prognoose ajaliselt pikkade nihete, liikuvate statistikute abil. Kui SARIMA mudelid vajasid uuesti treenimist peale igat prognoosi, siismasinõppe, süvaõppe ja hübriid mudelite mittelineaarsed osad prognoosisid kõige paremini, kui neid treeniti uuesti ainult keskmiselt iga kahe nädala tagant, mis vähendas oluliselt kogu arvutuskulu.  \nCERCS teaduseriala: P160 Statistika, operatsioonianalüüs, programmeerimine, finants-ja kindlustusmatemaatika.  \nMärksõnad: MASE, SARIMA, XGBoost, LightGBM, LSTM, Hübriid.  \nCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL TIME SERIES, MACHINE LEARNING, DEEP LEARNING AND HYBRID MODELS FOR PROFIT FORECASTING IN FINANCIAL MARKETS  \nMaster thesis  \nWilliam Vaask  \nAbstract  \nThis thesis compared the forecasting performance of traditional time series, machine learning, deep learning and hybrid models on daily banking profit data in financial markets area aggregated on three different levels. To evaluate different methods, this thesis used a novel performance metric - corrected mean average scaled error (cMASE), which improves interpretability of MASE by using T one-step naive forecasts instead of T − 1, which results in naive method always having a score of cMASE = 1 .  \nDespite various models available due to advancements in computational power, traditional time series method SARIMA still outperformed other models, showing the most consistent results between average cross-validation cMASEand testing cMASE.  \nFor best hybrid models, gradient boosting complemented SARIMA by correcting forecasts using long lags and rolling statistics. While SARIMA models required refitting after every forecast, machine learning, deep learning and non-linear parts of hybrid models performed best when refit only on average once every two weeks, which reduced the overall computing cost significantly. CERCS research specialisation: P160 Statistics, operations research, programming, financial and actuarial mathematics.  \nKey Words: MASE, SARIMA, XGBoost, LightGBM, LSTM, Hybrid.  \nContents  \nIntroduction 5  \n1 Instruments in banking in financial markets area 6  \n2 Models 9  \n2.1 Traditional Time Series Models ................. 10  \n2.2 Machine Learning Models .................... 11  \n2.2.1 LightGBM ......................... 14  \n2.2.2 XGBoost .......................... 15  \n2.3 Deep learning Model ....................... 17  \n2.3.1 Finding optimal weights and biases ........... 19  \n2.3.2 Backpropagation algorithm ............... 20  \n2.3.3 Recurrent neural network ................ 22  \n2.3.4 Long short term memory ................. 23  \n2.4 Hybrid Model ........................... 26  \n2.5 Loss functions ...........................","cbCaiaz0cNgopIhv","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaz0cNgopIhv","pdf",1616257,1,73,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n# Instruments in banking in financial markets area\n# Models\n## Traditional Time Series Models\n## Machine Learning Models\n## Deep learning Model\n## Hybrid Model\n## Loss functions\n## Importance and hypothesis\n# Methodology\n## Dataset\n## Data preprocessing\n## Modeling\n## Hyperparameter tuning\n# Results\n## Profit series aggregated on an instrument level\n## Profit series aggregated on a portfolio level\n## Profit series aggregated on a trading desk level\n# Discussion\n# Conclusions\n# Citations","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the thesis address?\",\"answer\":\"The thesis addresses how to forecast profits in banking within financial markets using traditional, machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid modeling approaches.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the thesis evaluate forecasting methods?\",\"answer\":\"It uses a corrected mean average scaled error (cMASE), designed to improve MASE interpretability by using T one-step naive forecasts so the naive method always achieves cMASE=1.\"},{\"question\":\"Which model family performs best overall and how do hybrid models help?\",\"answer\":\"SARIMA delivers the most consistent results across cross-validation and testing. For top hybrid models, gradient boosting improves SARIMA forecasts by correcting them using long lags and rolling statistics.\"}]","Comparative Analysis of Traditional Time Series, Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Models for Profit Forecasting in Financial Markets | PDF",1785817302,184,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":34,"description":14,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":28},"comparative-analysis-of-traditional-time-series-machine-learning-deep-learning-and-hybrid-models-for-profit-forecasting-in-financial-markets","",{"@graph":36,"@context":85},[37,54,68],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparative-analysis-of-traditional-time-series-machine-learning-deep-learning-and-hybrid-models-for-profit-forecasting-in-financial-markets/123556/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-08-04",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What problem does the thesis address?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"The thesis addresses how to forecast profits in banking within financial markets using traditional, machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid modeling approaches.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"How does the thesis evaluate forecasting methods?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"It uses a corrected mean average scaled error (cMASE), designed to improve MASE interpretability by using T one-step naive forecasts so the naive method always achieves cMASE=1.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"Which model family performs best overall and how do hybrid models help?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"SARIMA delivers the most consistent results across cross-validation and testing. For top hybrid models, gradient boosting improves SARIMA forecasts by correcting them using long lags and rolling statistics.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":87,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,97,101,105,110,115,120,123,128,131,135],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":47,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},30,"research-report",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":127},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":126,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":130},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":132,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":132,"slug":134},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":136,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":138},19,"General","general"]