[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-650141-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-650141-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","comparative-analysis-of-as-built-drawings-with-implementation-results","Comparative Analysis of As Built Drawings with Implementation Results","","Comparative analysis evaluates how as-built drawings align with construction company standards and expected parameters, demonstrating that the produced drawings satisfy most targeted characteristics. The study shows that 3D modeling, particularly with Autodesk software, enables accurate and reliable building representation and supports comparison between initial plans and field implementation. Despite some limits in displayed information, the drawings provide general structure and dimensional insight for detecting potential errors or discrepancies, improving efficiency, quality, and safety while informing standards development for as-built drawings.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparative-analysis-of-as-built-drawings-with-implementation-results/650141/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparative-analysis-of-as-built-drawings-with-implementation-results/650141.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Franzy","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-24",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":30},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What is the primary purpose of comparing as-built drawings with implementation results?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"To identify differences or discrepancies between approved plans and actual construction in the field, improving efficiency, quality, and safety.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How does the study support the accuracy of the as-built drawings?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"It reports good geometric accuracy using an RMSE value of 1.9 cm with a standard deviation of 1.4 cm and states that drawings meet validation criteria.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"What role does 3D modeling (Autodesk) play in this research?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"3D modeling helps produce accurate and reliable as-built representations and enables researchers to analyze potential differences and recommend improvements or design changes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},650141,1793136411,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":30,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},2336478945519,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","# Comparative Analysis of As Built Drawings with Implementation Results\n\natthe Kadiri University Construction Field  \nImam Mustofa1*, Eko Siswanto2, Sigit Winarto3  \n1,2,3 Civil Engineering, Universitas Kadiri, Kediri, Indonesia  \n*Corresponding author e-mail: imammustofa@unik-kediri.ac.id ,Received 19th Feb 2024; Revision 18th March 2024; Accepted 31th March 2024  \n## ABSTRACT\n\nComparative analysis of as-built drawings with construction company standards shows thatthe as-built drawings made meet most of the expected characteristics and parameters. Thisillustrates that 3D modeling technology, especially using Autodesk software, can provideaccurate and reliable results. This as-built drawing can be used as a good reference foranalyzing differences between initial plans and implementation in the field. Although there aresome limitations in the information that can be displayed, this as-built drawing can provide ageneral idea of the structure and dimensions of the building. Thus, it can help in identifyingpotential errors or discrepancies between drawings and actual implementation. This researchcontributes to increasing efficiency, quality and safety in the building construction process. Byusing 3D modeling technology and analyzing as-built drawings, researchers can identifypotential differences and provide recommendations for improvements or design changes tominimize risks and ensure good quality of the final result. This research also provides insightinto the development of standards or guidelines for making as-built drawings in theconstruction industry. Based on the analysis of the level of conformity of the project results inthe field with the as-built drawings for building construction, the quality of the as-built  \ndrawings has good geometric accuracy as indicated by an RMSE of 1.9 cm and a standard  \ndeviation of 1.4 cm, which means it falls into the appropriate mm-cm fraction. with imagevalidation criteria. As built drawings also meet all drawing validation criteria. Apart fromthat, the as-built drawing meets all the parameters in the characteristic criteria forthe as-builtdrawing model.  \nKeywords: As Built Drawing; Comparison of Construction Standards; 3D ModelingTechnology; Plan Analysis; Efficiency.  \nCopyright © Imam Mustofa, Eko Siswanto, Sigit Winarto  \nThis isan open access article under the:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  \n## INTRODUCTION\n\nDesign Estimate Engineering (DED) is the main guideline in planning the developmentprocess. In making planning designs, sometimes changes or deviations from the initial designoccur during the implementation process. By analyzing as-built drawings, we can ensure thatthe building is being built in accordance with the approved plans. Itis necessary to analyze as -built drawings for building construction, it is important to have a strong understanding of theconstruction techniques used. Various knowledge of construction methods, building materials,structures, as well as mechanical and electrical installations. Building construction drawingsinvolve the ability to understand technical drawings, such as plans, views, sections andconstruction details.[1]  \n   \nChanges in work contract drawings and implementation times on construction projects oftenoccur, this is due to a mismatch between plans and those in the field. Previous studies haveshown that the main cause of project failure is the lack of competency in soft skills of projectmanagement professionals. Thus, it is necessary to examine the influence of soft skills on thecritical success of these factors, this increases the probability of project success. Most of theexisting studies related to project manager soft skills were conducted in developed countrycontexts. The construction industry is expected to maintain a nominal growth rate of 11.43%in 2014-2018 due to the government's focus on industrial and residential construction inVietnam.[2]  \nAs-built drawings of building construction can be analyzed by comparing app","cbCaig5Stp75v5Y3","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaig5Stp75v5Y3","pdf",2640319,13,"English","# Abstract\n# Introduction","[{\"question\":\"What is the primary purpose of comparing as-built drawings with implementation results?\",\"answer\":\"To identify differences or discrepancies between approved plans and actual construction in the field, improving efficiency, quality, and safety.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the study support the accuracy of the as-built drawings?\",\"answer\":\"It reports good geometric accuracy using an RMSE value of 1.9 cm with a standard deviation of 1.4 cm and states that drawings meet validation criteria.\"},{\"question\":\"What role does 3D modeling (Autodesk) play in this research?\",\"answer\":\"3D modeling helps produce accurate and reliable as-built representations and enables researchers to analyze potential differences and recommend improvements or design changes.\"}]","Comparative Analysis of As Built Drawings with Implementation Results | PDF",1792819424,33]