[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-599448-105":59,"doc-detail-599448-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","communications-in-information-literacy-issue-2-a-review","Communications in Information Literacy - Issue 2 - A Review","","Wider visibility of information literacy (IL) beyond the library and information science field is essential for IL instruction, learning, and research. This article reviews higher education teaching journals to examine how IL discussions have evolved over the past decade, and whether changes have affected other disciplines. It analyzes articles published in 30 general and 32 disciplinary higher education journals from 2012–2022, finding increased IL discourse yet continued gaps in referencing five major IL documents.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/communications-in-information-literacy-issue-2-a-review/599448/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/communications-in-information-literacy-issue-2-a-review/599448.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"WPS_1790064749","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the central purpose of the article?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"To examine how information literacy visibility has changed in English-language higher education teaching journals over time, and how those changes relate to prior work on IL being “invisible.”","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which journals and time range does the study analyze?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Articles are reviewed from 30 general higher education journals and 32 disciplinary higher education journals published between 2012 and 2022.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the study find about IL references compared with earlier years?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"There is a notable increase in IL discussions within higher education and non-LIS disciplines, but references to five major information literacy documents remain limited.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},599448,1792192336,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747859154,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Communications in Information Literacy  \n\n| Volume 17  Issue 2 | Article 3 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 12-2023\u003Cbr>Information Literacy in English-Language Higher Education Teaching Journals: A Review\u003Cbr>Jennifer Masunaga\u003Cbr>California State University, Los Angeles, [jmasuna@calstatela.edu](jmasuna@calstatela.edu)\u003Cbr>Lanyi Peng\u003Cbr>California State University, Los Angeles, [lpeng7@calstatela.edu](lpeng7@calstatela.edu)\u003Cbr>Tiffanie Ford-Baxter\u003Cbr>California State University Los Angeles, [tfordba@calstatela.edu](tfordba@calstatela.edu)\u003Cbr>Kendall Faulkner\u003Cbr>California State University, Los Angeles, [kfaulkn3@calstatela.edu](kfaulkn3@calstatela.edu)\u003Cbr>Follow this and additional works at: [https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit](https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit)\u003Cbr> Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Information Literacy Commons\u003Cbr>Let us know how access to this document benefits you. |  |\n\nRecommended Citation  \nMasunaga, J., Peng, L., Ford-Baxter, T., & Faulkner, K. (2023) . Information Literacy in English-Language Higher Education Teaching Journals: A Review. Communications in Information Literacy, 17 (2), 353–377.  \n[https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.3](https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.3)  \nThis open access Research Article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4 .0) . All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team.  \nInformation Literacy in English-Language Higher Education  \nTeaching Journals: A Review  \nJennifer Masunaga, California State University, Los Angeles Lanyi Peng, California State University, Los Angeles Tiffanie Ford-Baxter, California State University Los Angeles Kendall Faulkner, California State University, Los Angeles  \nAbstract  \nWider visibility of information literacy (IL) outside of the library and information science (LIS) field is important to the success of IL instruction, learning, and research. The development and major updates of several information literacy documents in the past decade evidence the changing landscape of IL research, but how these changes have impacted other disciplines remains to be seen. To aid in this discussion, this article examinesa wide range of higher education teaching journals to expand on Badke's (2011) work,“Why Information Literacy is Invisible.” Specifically, this study examines articles published in 30 general higher education and 32 disciplinary higher education journals between 2012 and 2022. Although there is a notable increase in the discussion of IL within higher education and non-LIS disciplines journals, there is a gap in references to the five major information literacy documents, supporting Badke's notion that some LIS work remains underrepresented in the broader academic literature.  \nKeywords: information literacy, instruction, publishing, library and information science, higher education  \nMasunaga, J., Peng, L., Ford-Baxter, T., Faulkner, K. (2023) . A review of references to information literacy in higher education English-language teaching journals. Communications in Information Literacy, 17(2), 353–377.  \nA Review of References to Information Literacy in Higher Education English-Language Teaching Journals  \nIn an influential 2011 Perspectives column, Badke argued that information literacy (IL) was\"invisible\" to disciplinary instructors and university administrators. He presented several interlocking reasons for the lack of understanding, including the isolation of IL scholarly discussions to library and information science (LIS) research. He illustrated this point by reviewing prominent higher education journals for the term \"information literacy.\" Areview of 32 journals published before 2009 showed that over half included no mention of IL, and only about a quarter had more than two referencing articles. Library and informatio","cbCainLK2miAl1Re","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainLK2miAl1Re","pdf",327448,26,"English","# Abstract\n# Research Questions\n## RQ1\n## RQ2\n## RQ3\n# Background and Conceptual Evolution\n## Curriculum and Standards\n## Accreditation and National Documents","[{\"question\":\"What is the central purpose of the article?\",\"answer\":\"To examine how information literacy visibility has changed in English-language higher education teaching journals over time, and how those changes relate to prior work on IL being “invisible.”\"},{\"question\":\"Which journals and time range does the study analyze?\",\"answer\":\"Articles are reviewed from 30 general higher education journals and 32 disciplinary higher education journals published between 2012 and 2022.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the study find about IL references compared with earlier years?\",\"answer\":\"There is a notable increase in IL discussions within higher education and non-LIS disciplines, but references to five major information literacy documents remain limited.\"}]","Communications in Information Literacy - Issue 2 - A Review | PDF",1792088788,66]