[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-292536-105":59,"doc-detail-292536-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","coding-the-future-recommendations-for-regulatory-oversight-in-the-high-technology-education-field","Coding the Future - Recommendations for Regulatory Oversight in the High Technology Education Field","","Task Force Report on regulatory oversight in California’s high technology education field, outlining required disclosures for prospective students, evaluating the appropriateness of student-outcome reporting methods and content, and proposing state steps to foster growth of high-quality training programs. The report explains the rise of High Technology Programs, summarizes key context such as workforce shortages and projected employment demand, and frames actions requested from an Advisory Committee to prepare approval for submission to the Legislature by July 1, 2016.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/coding-the-future-recommendations-for-regulatory-oversight-in-the-high-technology-education-field/292536/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/coding-the-future-recommendations-for-regulatory-oversight-in-the-high-technology-education-field/292536.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Lucas Martin","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What disclosures does the Task Force address for students before enrollment?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The report focuses on whether students should receive certain disclosures prior to enrolling in educational programs offered by High Technology Program institutions.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the report evaluate student outcomes reporting?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It examines whether the means of reporting student outcomes and the content of those reports are appropriate.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What action is requested from the Advisory Committee?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The Task Force requests that the Advisory Committee review the report at the February 2016 meeting and approve it so the Bureau can provide the approved report to the Legislature no later than July 1, 2016.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},292536,1789652596,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},8796095360427,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency– Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.  \nBureau for Private Postsecondary Education  \n2535 Capitol Oaks Drive, Suite 400 , Sacramento, CA 95833  \nP.O. Box 980818 , West Sacramento, CA 95798-0818 P (916) 431-6959 F (916) [263-1897](263-1897 www.bppe.ca.gov)[ www.bppe.ca.gov](263-1897 www.bppe.ca.gov)  \n| DATE | 12/30/2015 |\n| --- | --- |\n| TO | Advisory Committee Members |\n| FROM | Ben Triffo, Research Analyst on behalf of Task Force Members – Innovative Subject Matters |\n| SUBJECT | Task Force Report |\n\nBackground:  \nPursuant to Education Code section 94880 . 1(a)(3), the Task Force transmits the attached report, entitled“Coding the Future: Recommendations for Regulatory Oversight in the High Technology Education Field,” to the members of the Advisory Committee. The Task Force’s report includes its recommendations and findings to the Legislature on each of the following:  \n􀁸 Whether students attending institutions should receive certain disclosures prior to enrolling inan educational program offered by those institutions.  \n􀁸 Whether the means of reporting student outcomes and the content of those reports are appropriate.  \n􀁸 The steps the state may take to promote the growth of high-quality training programs in skills for high technology occupations.  \nAction Requested:  \nTo review the report and be prepared to discuss and take action on it at the February, 2016 Advisory Committee meeting. Specifically, pursuant to Education Code section 94880. 1(b), the Task Force requests that the Advisory Committee approve the report so that the Bureau may provide the approved report to the Legislature no later than July 1, 2016.  \nCoding the Future  \nRecommendations for Regulatory Oversight in the High Technology  \nEducation Field  \nBPPE  \nBureau for Private Postsecondary Education  \n• T &Ta 0 Cl  \nIC A. L.. IF DAN IA  \na  \nDEPARTMENT OF' CONSUMER AFFAIRS  \nTable of Contents  \nExecutive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3  \nPrivate Postsecondary Education in California ............................................................................................. 6  \nTask Force Methodologies ............................................................................................................................ 7  \nWhat is a High Technology Program? ........................................................................................................... 8  \nApproach and Methods for Protecting Students and Fostering Growth...................................................... 9  \nDisclosures ................................................................................................................................................ 9  \nReporting of Student Outcomes ............................................................................................................. 12  \nState Steps .............................................................................................................................................. 17  \nConclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 21  \nEndnotes ..................................................................................................................................................... 26  \nAppendix A   27  \nAppendix C ............................................................... ................................................................................... 43  \n\n| | Comment [JC1]: Consider eliminating HTP only SPFS per public advocate feedback |\n| --- | --- |\n|  |  |\n|  | Comment [JC2]: Delete the GA and Dev Bootcamp data from APP B per public advocate feedback |\n|  |  |\n\nAppendix B   39  \nExecutive Summary  \nThe origins of the Task Force began with Senate Bill 1247 (Lieu, Chapter 840, Statues of 2014), which charg","cbCaitHbd0GNAyb4","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitHbd0GNAyb4","pdf",2380715,103,"English","# Executive Summary\n# Private Postsecondary Education in California\n# Task Force Methodologies\n# What is a High Technology Program?\n# Approach and Methods for Protecting Students and Fostering Growth\n# Disclosures\n# Reporting of Student Outcomes\n# State Steps\n# Conclusion\n# Endnotes\n# Appendix A\n# Appendix C","[{\"question\":\"What disclosures does the Task Force address for students before enrollment?\",\"answer\":\"The report focuses on whether students should receive certain disclosures prior to enrolling in educational programs offered by High Technology Program institutions.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report evaluate student outcomes reporting?\",\"answer\":\"It examines whether the means of reporting student outcomes and the content of those reports are appropriate.\"},{\"question\":\"What action is requested from the Advisory Committee?\",\"answer\":\"The Task Force requests that the Advisory Committee review the report at the February 2016 meeting and approve it so the Bureau can provide the approved report to the Legislature no later than July 1, 2016.\"}]","Coding the Future - Recommendations for Regulatory Oversight in the High Technology Education Field | PDF",260]