[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-322554-105":59,"doc-detail-322554-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","class-action-complaint-for-declaratory-and-injunctive-relief-minut-monitor-program","Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief - Minut Monitor Program","","Civil rights class action filed in the Superior Court of New Hampshire challenging the Concord Housing and Redevelopment Authority’s decision to install Minut Monitor electronic surveillance equipment in hundreds of residential units. The complaint alleges the devices continuously collect granular presence and activity data inside tenants’ homes, enabling intrusive government intrusion and revealing intimate personal details. Plaintiffs assert unconstitutional privacy violations, overbroad and arbitrary monitoring, inadequate notice and transparency, and use of information without tenant consent, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/class-action-complaint-for-declaratory-and-injunctive-relief-minut-monitor-program/322554/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/class-action-complaint-for-declaratory-and-injunctive-relief-minut-monitor-program/322554.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Rizky","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What action is being filed in this complaint?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"A civil rights class action challenging the installation and operation of intrusive electronic monitoring equipment in residential units, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What does the Minut Monitor program allegedly collect from tenants’ homes?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The devices allegedly monitor and transmit ongoing granular information about presence and activity, including motion, noise levels, estimated number of people, and other data from within units.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why do plaintiffs argue the monitoring is unlawful?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Plaintiffs allege the monitoring invades privacy under the New Hampshire Constitution, is arbitrary and overbroad, lacks program transparency and deficient notice, and occurs without tenant consent to collect personal information.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},322554,1790362798,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962085564807,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE  \nMERRIMACK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT  \nMark LaValley and Terri King, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others  \nsimilarly situated  \nv.  \nConcord Housing and Redevelopment Authority  \nNo.    \nCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nINTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4  \nTHE PARTIES ................................................................................................................................ 6  \nJURISDICTION AND VENUE ..................................................................................................... 7  \nFACTS ............................................................................................................................................ 8  \nI. The Concord Housing and Redevelopment Authority.................................................. 8  \nII. Minut Monitor Devices ................................................................................................. 8  \nIII. Sensors ........................................................................................................................ 10  \nIV. Minut App .................................................................................................................... 11  \nV. CHRA’s Purchase of the Minut Monitor Devices....................................................... 14  \nVI. Minut, Inc. Privacy Policy and Terms of Service ....................................................... 16  \nVII. CHRA’s Installation of the Minut Monitor Devices .................................................. 17  \nVIII. CHRA’s Notice to Tenants ....................................................................................... 21  \nIX. Tenant Objections ....................................................................................................... 24  \nX. CHRA’s Lease Addendum .......................................................................................... 25  \nXI. Tenant Plaintiff Mark LaValley’s Experiences with Minut Monitors......................... 27  \nXII. Tenant Plaintiff Terri King’s Experiences with Minut Monitors............................... 31  \nXIII. CHRA’s Arbitrary and Overbroad Use ofthe Minut Monitors ................................ 35  \nA. Implementation simultaneously overbroad and arbitrary ............................... 35  \nB. Lack of Program Transparency and Deficient Notice..................................... 35  \nC. Minut Monitor Use is Not Narrowly Tailored or even Rationally Related to Program Objectives ....................................................................... 39  \nD. Lack ofTenant Consent to Collect Personal Information............................... 45  \nXIV. Warrantless Search and Government Intrusion ........................................................ 45  \nA. Article 2-b of the New Hampshire Constitution ............................................. 45  \nB. Article 19 of the New Hampshire Constitution .............................................. 47  \nCLASS ALLEGATIONS .............................................................................................................. 49  \nCLAIMS FOR RELIEF ................................................................................................................ 52  \nCOUNT I .......................................................................................................................... 52  \nCOUNT II ......................................................................................................................... 56  \nPRAYER FOR RELIEF................................................................................................................ 59  \nNOW COME Plaintiffs Mark LaValley and Terri King of the City of Concord, Merrimack County, State of New Hampshire, and complain against the Defendant Concord Housing an","cbCaitQZiiCdD1xs","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitQZiiCdD1xs","pdf",1120065,61,"English","# INTRODUCTION\n# THE PARTIES\n# JURISDICTION AND VENUE\n# FACTS\n## The Concord Housing and Redevelopment Authority\n## Minut Monitor Devices\n## Sensors\n## Minut App\n## CHRA’s Purchase of the Minut Monitor Devices\n## Minut, Inc. Privacy Policy and Terms of Service\n## CHRA’s Installation of the Minut Monitor Devices\n## CHRA’s Notice to Tenants\n## Tenant Objections\n## CHRA’s Lease Addendum\n## Tenant Plaintiff Mark LaValley’s Experiences with Minut Monitors\n## Tenant Plaintiff Terri King’s Experiences with Minut Monitors\n## CHRA’s Arbitrary and Overbroad Use of the Minut Monitors\n# CLASS ALLEGATIONS\n# CLAIMS FOR RELIEF\n# PRAYER FOR RELIEF","[{\"question\":\"What action is being filed in this complaint?\",\"answer\":\"A civil rights class action challenging the installation and operation of intrusive electronic monitoring equipment in residential units, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the Minut Monitor program allegedly collect from tenants’ homes?\",\"answer\":\"The devices allegedly monitor and transmit ongoing granular information about presence and activity, including motion, noise levels, estimated number of people, and other data from within units.\"},{\"question\":\"Why do plaintiffs argue the monitoring is unlawful?\",\"answer\":\"Plaintiffs allege the monitoring invades privacy under the New Hampshire Constitution, is arbitrary and overbroad, lacks program transparency and deficient notice, and occurs without tenant consent to collect personal information.\"}]","Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief - Minut Monitor Program | PDF",1789963008,154]