[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-274480-105":59,"doc-detail-274480-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","christa-mcauliffe-intermediate-school-pto-inc-et-al-v-bill-de-blasio-et-al-memorandum-of-law-in-support-of-motion-to-intervene-as-defendants","CHRISTA MCAULIFFE - INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTO, INC. et al. v. BILL DE BLASIO et al. - MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS","","Legal memorandum supporting a motion to intervene as defendants in a federal case in the Southern District of New York. The filing identifies proposed defendant-intervenors, summarizes the factual background, and argues that intervention as of right is available under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a). It addresses timeliness, substantial interests potentially impaired by disposition, and inadequate representation by existing defendants, and also explains why permissive intervention is appropriate in the alternative.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/christa-mcauliffe-intermediate-school-pto-inc-et-al-v-bill-de-blasio-et-al-memorandum-of-law-in-support-of-motion-to-intervene-as-defendants/274480/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/christa-mcauliffe-intermediate-school-pto-inc-et-al-v-bill-de-blasio-et-al-memorandum-of-law-in-support-of-motion-to-intervene-as-defendants/274480.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Liam","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the document’s main purpose?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"To support a motion for proposed intervenors to intervene as defendants in the litigation.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"On what basis does the memorandum argue for intervention as of right?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"It relies on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), focusing on timeliness, substantial interests, and inadequate representation by defendants.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"If intervention as of right is not granted, what is the alternative request?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The memorandum argues that permissive intervention is appropriate in the alternative.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},274480,1789477881,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},8796095461564,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Case 1:18-cv-11657-ER Document 87-1 Filed 05/03/19 Page 1 of 37  \nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  \nCHRISTA MCAULIFFE  \nINTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTO, INC., et al.,  \nPlaintiffs,  \nv.  \nBILL DE BLASIO, in his official capacity as mayor of New York, et al.,  \nDefendants,  \nand  \nTEENS TAKE CHARGE; HISPANIC FEDERATION; DESIS RISING UP AND MOVING; COALITION FOR ASIAN AMERICAN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES; O.R., a minor by and through his mother and next friend, ELIZABETH PIERRET; A. S., a minor by and through his father and next friend, ODUNLAMI SHOWA; C.M., a minor by and through his mother and next friend, ROSA VELASQUEZ; K.B., a minor by and through her mother and next friend, TIFFANY M. BOND; N.D.F. and N.E.F., minor children by and through their mother and next friend, LAUREN R. MAHONEY,  \nProposed Defendant-Intervenors.  \nCase No. 1:18-cv-11657  \nMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS  \nCase 1:18-cv-11657-ER Document 87-1 Filed 05/03/19 Page 2 of 37  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nPAGE  \nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii  \nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT .....................................................................................................1  \nFACTUAL BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................................3  \nPROPOSED INTERVENORS ........................................................................................................8  \nRELEVANT LAW & ANALYSIS ...............................................................................................14  \nI. Proposed Intervenors Should be Granted Intervention as of Right Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)...............................................................................14  \nA. Proposed Intervenors’ Motion is Timely...............................................................15  \nB. Intervenors Have Substantial Interests that May be Impaired by the Disposition of the Litigation.................................................................................. 17  \nC. Proposed Intervenor’s Interests Are Not Adequately Represented by Defendants.............................................................................................................21  \nII. In the Alternative, Permissive Intervention Is Appropriate...............................................26  \nCONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................................30  \nCase 1:18-cv-11657-ER Document 87-1 Filed 05/03/19 Page 3 of 37  \nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES  \nPAGE(S)  \nCASES  \nASPIRA of New York, Inc. v. Bd. of Educ. of N.Y., 58 F.R.D. 62 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) .................................................................................................29  \nAss’n of Conn. Lobbyists LLC v. Garfield, 241 F.R.D. 100 (D. Conn. 2007)..............................................................................................29  \nBrennan v. N.Y.C. Bd. of Educ.,  \n260 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2001) ............................................................................................. passim  \nBrown v. Bd. of Ed. of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ...........................................................................................................20, 29  \nBrumfield v. Dodd,  \n749 F.3d 339 (5th Cir. 2014) ................................................................................................... 18  \nButler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp., 250 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2001) .....................................................................................................21  \nCaulfield v. Bd. of Educ. of N.Y., 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1980) .....................................................................................................29  \nComer v. Cisneros,  \n37 F.3d 775 (2d Cir. 1994) .................................","cbCaituwAXDYyRXh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaituwAXDYyRXh","pdf",337308,37,"English","# Table of Contents\n## Preliminary Statement\n## Factual Background\n## Proposed Intervenors\n## Relevant Law & Analysis\n### Proposed Intervenors Should be Granted Intervention as of Right Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)\n### In the Alternative, Permissive Intervention Is Appropriate\n# Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"What is the document’s main purpose?\",\"answer\":\"To support a motion for proposed intervenors to intervene as defendants in the litigation.\"},{\"question\":\"On what basis does the memorandum argue for intervention as of right?\",\"answer\":\"It relies on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), focusing on timeliness, substantial interests, and inadequate representation by defendants.\"},{\"question\":\"If intervention as of right is not granted, what is the alternative request?\",\"answer\":\"The memorandum argues that permissive intervention is appropriate in the alternative.\"}]","CHRISTA MCAULIFFE - INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTO, INC. et al. v. BILL DE BLASIO et al. - MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS | PDF",93]