[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-184191-en":3,"doc-seo-184191-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},184191,2336475104957,"นรินทร์","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c6bd8a5076e1?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787554080175789136",8,"Research & Report","CEOS-FRM - Assessment Framework - Version 1","CEOS-FRM Assessment Framework (V1) provides a structured self-assessment and independent assessor approach for evaluating Fiducial Reference Measurement (FRM). It defines assessment dimensions covering FRM instrumentation, operations and sampling, data characteristics, metrology verification, and related verification evidence. The framework specifies descriptors for topics such as instrument documentation, automation level, data completeness, uncertainty characterisation, guidelines adherence, traceable calibration evidence, traceability documentation, and utilization/feedback, concluding with an FRM classification selection across A to D.","| Acronyms | Full Version |\n| --- | --- |\n| ATBD | Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document |\n| CEOS | Committee on Earth Observation Satellites |\n| CF | Climate and Forecast |\n| CO2 | Carbon dioxide |\n| DOI | Digital Object Identifier |\n| EDAP | Earthnet Data Assessment Pilot |\n| ESA | European Space Agency |\n| EU | European Union |\n| EUMETSAT | European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites |\n| FAIR | Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable |\n| FIDUCEO | Fidelity and Uncertainty in Climate Data Records from Earth Observation |\n| FRM | Fiducial Reference Measurement |\n| FRM4SST | Fiducial Reference Measurements for Sea Surface Temperature |\n| FRM4STS | Fiducial Reference Measurements for validation of Surface Temperatures |\n| FTIR | Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy |\n| GEO | Group on Earth Observations |\n| GHG | Greenhouse gas |\n| GUM | Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement |\n| HCHO | Formaldehyde |\n| ISFRN | International SST FRM Radiometer Network |\n| ISO | International Organization for Standardization |\n| KIT | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology |\n\n| MM | Maturity Matrix |\n| --- | --- |\n| OC | Ocean Colour |\n| PoC | Point of Contact |\n| QA4EO | Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation |\n| RADCALNET | Radiometric Calibration Network |\n| ROI | Return on Investment |\n| SAR | Synthetic Aperture Radar |\n| SARCalNet | SAR Calibration Network |\n| SI | International System of Units |\n| URL | Uniform Resource Locator |\n| VIM | Vocabulary of Metrology |\n| WGCV | Working Group on Calibration and Validation |\n\n| Self-Assessment |  |  |  |  | Independent Assessor |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Nature of FRM | FRM Instrumentation | Operations/ Sampling | Data | Metrology | Verification |\n| Descriptor | Instrument documentation | Automation level | Data\u003Cbr>completeness | Uncertainty characterisation | Guidelines\u003Cbr>adherence |\n| Location/ availability of FRM | Evidence of\u003Cbr>traceable\u003Cbr>calibration | Measurand sampling/representativeness | Availability and Usability | Traceability documentation | Utilisation/Feedback |\n| Range of\u003Cbr>instruments | Maintenance plan | ATBDs on processing/software | Data format | Comparison/calibration of\u003Cbr>FRM | Metrology\u003Cbr>verification |\n| Complementary observations | Operator expertise | Guidelines on transformation to satellite Pixel | Ancillary data | Adequacy for intended class of instrument/measurand | Independent\u003Cbr>verification |\n| FRM CLASSIFICATION |  |  |  |  | A B C D (to be\u003Cbr>selected) |","cbCaisf3DLMo7J0U","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaisf3DLMo7J0U","pdf",932394,1,37,"English","en",105,"# Self-Assessment\n## Independent Assessor\n## Nature of FRM\n## FRM Instrumentation\n## Operations/ Sampling\n## Data\n## Metrology\n## Verification\n## FRM Classification","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the CEOS-FRM Assessment Framework V1?\",\"answer\":\"It structures how FRM is self-assessed and independently verified, ensuring consistent evaluation across instrumentation, operations, data, metrology, and verification evidence.\"},{\"question\":\"Which main dimensions are used to assess FRM in the framework?\",\"answer\":\"The framework evaluates FRM instrumentation, operations/sampling, data, metrology, and verification, supported by defined descriptors under each dimension.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the FRM classification work?\",\"answer\":\"FRM classification is selected from categories A, B, C, and D, based on the assessment results across the framework’s dimensions.\"}]","CEOS-FRM - Assessment Framework - Version 1 | PDF",1788356834,93,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":34,"description":14,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":28},"ceos-frm-assessment-framework-version-1","",{"@graph":36,"@context":85},[37,54,68],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/ceos-frm-assessment-framework-version-1/184191/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What is the purpose of the CEOS-FRM Assessment Framework V1?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"It structures how FRM is self-assessed and independently verified, ensuring consistent evaluation across instrumentation, operations, data, metrology, and verification evidence.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"Which main dimensions are used to assess FRM in the framework?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"The framework evaluates FRM instrumentation, operations/sampling, data, metrology, and verification, supported by defined descriptors under each dimension.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"How does the FRM classification work?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"FRM classification is selected from categories A, B, C, and D, based on the assessment results across the framework’s dimensions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":87,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,97,101,105,110,115,120,123,128,131,135],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":47,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},30,"research-report",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":127},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":126,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":130},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":132,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":132,"slug":134},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":136,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":138},19,"General","general"]