[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-423991-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-423991-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","caregiver-version-shared-decision-making-questionnaire-for-adult-child-and-parents-with-dementia-a-delphi-study","CAREGIVER VERSION SHARED DECISION-MAKING QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ADULT CHILD AND PARENTS WITH DEMENTIA - A DELPHI STUDY","","Adult children are the largest group of family caregivers globally and often serve as key long-term decision-makers for parents with dementia. Shared decision-making in dementia extends beyond clinical encounters, covering care arrangements, daily care, medication, and financial decisions made jointly by people with dementia and adult child caregivers. To address a research gap on patient-caregiver SDM, the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire was adapted into an adult-child caregiver version and assessed for content validity via a two-round online Delphi study.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/","Healthcare",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/caregiver-version-shared-decision-making-questionnaire-for-adult-child-and-parents-with-dementia-a-delphi-study/423991/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/caregiver-version-shared-decision-making-questionnaire-for-adult-child-and-parents-with-dementia-a-delphi-study/423991.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Aditya","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-28",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"Why adapt the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire for adult-child caregivers?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Existing studies mainly examine physician-patient shared decision-making, leaving limited understanding of SDM between people with dementia and their adult child caregivers. The adaptation targets caregivers’ perspectives on decision-making with their parents.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How was the caregiver version developed and evaluated?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The tool was translated and refined through a focus group with seven caregivers, then reviewed by nine experts in a two-round online Delphi study assessing importance, relevance, and clarity on a nine-point Likert scale.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What content validity results were found across Delphi rounds?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"In round one, item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.78 to 1, with Ave-CVI scores of 0.93 (importance), 0.94 (relevance), and 0.89 (clarity). In round two, I-CVI and Ave-CVI improved to 1, indicating excellent content validity and high consensus.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},423991,1790759465,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":107,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":26,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":97,"preview_page_count":4},962085564549,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Innovation in Aging, 2025, Vol. 9, No. S2 879  \nAbstract citation ID: igaf122.2974  \nCAREGIVER VERSION SHARED DECISION-MAKING QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ADULT CHILD AND PARENTS WITH DEMENTIA: A DELPHI STUDY  \nLiu Huanran, and Vivian Lou, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (People’s Republic)  \nAdult children constitute the largest group of family caregivers globally and play a pivotal role as primary decision-makers and long-term caregivers for parents with dementia. While shared decision-making (SDM) traditionally involves patients and physicians in clinical settings, dementia care often extends beyond formal healthcare, with decisions about care arrangements, daily care, medication, and finances frequently made by people with dementia and adult child caregivers. Despite the importance of SDM in dementia care, existing research has primarily focused on physician-patient dynamics, leaving a significant gap in understanding patient-caregiver SDM. To address this gap, we adapted the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q) into an adult-child caregiver version and evaluated its content validity through a two-round online Delphi study. This adapted tool aims to assess caregivers’ perspectives on decision-making with their parents. After translation and a focus group with seven caregivers, nine experts (three researchers, four  \n880 Innovation in Aging, 2025, Vol. 9, No. S2  \npractitioners, and two caregivers) evaluated the scale’s importance, relevance, and clarity using a nine-point Likert scale. Changes, such as replacing “patient” with “my father/mother,” were made based on expert feedback to reduce stereotypes. In the first r ound, item-level content validity indices (I-CVI) ranged from 0.78 to 1 across domains, with Ave-CVI scores of 0.93 (importance), 0.94 (relevance), and 0.89 (clarity). All items achieved moderate to high consensus. In the second round, I-CVI andAve-CVI improved to 1, indicating excellent content validity and high expert consensus.  \nThese results suggest the SDM-Q-Carer is a valid tool for exploring decision-making involvement among adult child caregivers, though further validation is recommended.","cbCaiaYTjcDBC6Xn","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaYTjcDBC6Xn","pdf",64514,"English","# Abstract\n## Background and purpose\n## Adaptation method\n## Delphi evaluation results\n## Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"Why adapt the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire for adult-child caregivers?\",\"answer\":\"Existing studies mainly examine physician-patient shared decision-making, leaving limited understanding of SDM between people with dementia and their adult child caregivers. The adaptation targets caregivers’ perspectives on decision-making with their parents.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the caregiver version developed and evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"The tool was translated and refined through a focus group with seven caregivers, then reviewed by nine experts in a two-round online Delphi study assessing importance, relevance, and clarity on a nine-point Likert scale.\"},{\"question\":\"What content validity results were found across Delphi rounds?\",\"answer\":\"In round one, item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.78 to 1, with Ave-CVI scores of 0.93 (importance), 0.94 (relevance), and 0.89 (clarity). In round two, I-CVI and Ave-CVI improved to 1, indicating excellent content validity and high consensus.\"}]","CAREGIVER VERSION SHARED DECISION-MAKING QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ADULT CHILD AND PARENTS WITH DEMENTIA - A DELPHI STUDY | PDF",1790632591]