[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-323652-105":59,"doc-detail-323652-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","can-anarchists-learn-from-marx","Can Anarchists Learn from Marx?","","Major economic upheavals motivate a direct inquiry into capitalism’s functioning and the theories used to understand it. It contrasts conservative free-market and Keynesian approaches, describing both as frameworks that ultimately defend capitalist management by governments. Marx’s work is presented as the most fully developed alternate economic theory for analyzing capitalism’s mechanics, while anarchism is argued to be stronger for articulating a post-capitalist socialist goal, drawing on debates over value, profit, and political strategy.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/can-anarchists-learn-from-marx/323652/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/can-anarchists-learn-from-marx/323652.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Seraphina","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-05","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",15,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Why does the text focus on understanding the economic crisis?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It argues that the world faces intertwined political, ecological, cultural, and even spiritual upheavals, with a deep economic crisis overlapping them. Understanding the nature of the crisis is presented as necessary to address it effectively.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the text characterize mainstream economic schools?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"It describes both the conservative free-market tradition and the liberal/social democratic Keynesian tradition as bourgeois in the sense that they advocate capitalism. They are portrayed as justifying capitalism and advising governments on managing capitalist economies.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What does the author claim about Marx versus anarchism?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Marx is presented as offering a detailed analysis of how capitalism works as an economic system. Anarchism is argued to be superior when it comes to presenting a post-capitalist, socialist goal and an anarchist program.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},323652,1790372564,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":145,"read_time":146,"preview_page_count":4},962075114101,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/e000253a75eb197efd?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780044092746381165","Opening  \n“The transcripts of the 2006 meetings [of the governors of the Federal Reserve Board and the presidents of the 19 regional banks, two years before the Great Recession] ...clearly show some of the nation ’s pre-eminent economic minds did not fully understand the basic mechanics of the economy that they were charged with shepherding. The problem was not a lack of information; it was a lack of comprehension, born in part of their deep confidence in economic forecasting models that turned out to be broken.”  \nNY Times January 13, 2012  \n“Just as the economists are the scientific representatives of the bourgeois class, so the socialists and the communists are the theoreticians of the  \nproletarian class.”  \nKarl Marx  \nContents  \nIntroduction 1 Part I: Basics  \nChapter 1 : The Labor Theory of Value 15  \nChapter 2 : Cycles, Recessions, and the Falling Rate of Profit 43  \nPart II: Epochs of Capitalism  \nChapter 3 : Capitalism’s Dramatic Entrance: Primitive Accumulation 59  \nChapter 4 : The Epoch of Capitalist Decline and Social Revolution 71  \nChapter 5 : The Post-War Boom and Fictitious Capital 93  \nChapter 6 : State Capitalism 105 Part III: The Socialist Goal  \nChapter 7 : Socialism or Barbarism? 117  \nChapter 8 : What Marx Meant by Socialism and Communism 135  \nConclusion: An Anarchist Critique of Marx’s Political Economy 151  \nAppendix to Chapter 8 : Malatesta’s Method for an Anarchist Economy 165  \nReferences for Further Reading 177 Bibliography 181  \nIntroduction  \nTHE world is facing major upheavals—political, military, ecological, cultural, and even spiritual. Clearly this includes a deep economic crisis, one that overlaps with all others. We need to understand the nature of the economic crisis if we are to deal with it.  \nWhen it comes to theories about the economy, the two main schools are both bourgeois, in the sense that they advocate capitalism. Both the conservative, unrestrictedfree-market school (in its monetarist and “Austrian”versions) and the liberal/social democratic Keynesian school exist to justify capitalism and to advise the government on how to manage the capitalist economy.  \nThe only developed, alternate economic theory has been Karl Marx’s. His theory was a detailed and well thought-out guide for the working class, to help it understand the capitalist system in order to end it. Other radicals, particularly anarchists, developed certain topics relating to economics, such as the possible nature of a post-capitalist economy. But no one developed an overall analysis of how capitalism worked as an economic system as thoroughly as Marx. Therefore I will be focusing on Marx’s work, eventhough I am an anarchist and not a Marxist (nor an economist for that matter) . I do not accept the total worldview developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, even though I think much of their analysis is accurate.  \nWhen people write about “radical economics” they generally mean two interrelated topics. One is an analysis of the currently-existing capitalist economy. The other is the vision of a post-capitalist, post-revolutionary, economy. From these two topics, it is possible to develop a strategy forgetting from one to the other. When it comes to an analysis of capitalist economy, Marx’s economic theories are superior to others, including what there is of anarchist economic thinking. In An Anarchist FAQ, Iain McKay writes  \nthat there are “subjects anarchists have, traditionally, been weak on, such as economics” (2008, 13) . Anarchists have certainly made contributions, but there is no coherent“anarchist economics” in this sense. While Proudhon may have come closest, neither he nor other anarchists developed his insights into a full system comparable to Marx’s work. However, when it comes to presenting a postcapitalist vision, a socialist goal, then anarchism (with other, non-Marxist, libertarian socialisms), I believe, is superior to Marxism. This is not to deny that Marx made useful contributions, but nothing he or E","cbCaiiJwCeBvme7i","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiiJwCeBvme7i","pdf",888091,156,"English","# Introduction\n## Economic crisis and competing schools\n## Marx as the main alternate theory\n## Radical economics: analysis and post-capitalist vision\n## Anarchists studying Marx\n# Part I: Basics\n## Chapter 1 : The Labor Theory of Value\n## Chapter 2 : Cycles, Recessions, and the Falling Rate of Profit\n# Part II: Epochs of Capitalism\n## Chapter 3 : Capitalism’s Dramatic Entrance: Primitive Accumulation\n## Chapter 4 : The Epoch of Capitalist Decline and Social Revolution\n## Chapter 5 : The Post-War Boom and Fictitious Capital\n## Chapter 6 : State Capitalism\n# Part III: The Socialist Goal\n## Chapter 7 : Socialism or Barbarism?\n## Chapter 8 : What Marx Meant by Socialism and Communism\n# Conclusion\n# Appendix to Chapter 8\n# References for Further Reading","[{\"question\":\"Why does the text focus on understanding the economic crisis?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that the world faces intertwined political, ecological, cultural, and even spiritual upheavals, with a deep economic crisis overlapping them. Understanding the nature of the crisis is presented as necessary to address it effectively.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the text characterize mainstream economic schools?\",\"answer\":\"It describes both the conservative free-market tradition and the liberal/social democratic Keynesian tradition as bourgeois in the sense that they advocate capitalism. They are portrayed as justifying capitalism and advising governments on managing capitalist economies.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the author claim about Marx versus anarchism?\",\"answer\":\"Marx is presented as offering a detailed analysis of how capitalism works as an economic system. Anarchism is argued to be superior when it comes to presenting a post-capitalist, socialist goal and an anarchist program.\"}]","Can Anarchists Learn from Marx? | PDF",1789965765,393]