[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-642301-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":74,"doc-detail-642301-en":124},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":67,"head_meta":69,"extra_data":71,"updated_unix":73},105,"en","cambridge-international-project-qualification-results-statistics-june-2021","Cambridge International Project Qualification Results Statistics - June 2021","","This report presents the cumulative world grade statistics for the Cambridge International Project Qualification (IPQ) for the June 2021 examination series. It details the percentage of candidates achieving grades ranging from A* through E, as well as the percentage of ungraded candidates. The documentation specifies that the awarding standards for this series were aligned with school-assessed grades and equivalent qualifications taken in England to ensure consistency, while noting that these figures may be subject to change following individual results enquiries. The data provides a comprehensive overview of candidate performance, reflecting a high proportion of students achieving top-tier grades, with 39.2% attaining an A* and 92.6% achieving a grade C or above. This statistical summary serves as an essential reference for educators, administrators, and stakeholders interested in the performance metrics of the Cambridge IPQ curriculum during the 2021 assessment period.",{"@graph":14,"@context":66},[15,34,49],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/cambridge-international-project-qualification-results-statistics-june-2021/642301/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"author":36,"headline":10,"publisher":39,"fileFormat":42,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":43,"datePublished":43,"encodingFormat":42,"isAccessibleForFree":44,"interactionStatistic":45},"DigitalDocument",{"name":37,"@type":38},"Eliana","Person",{"url":19,"name":40,"@type":41},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23",true,{"@type":46,"interactionType":47,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":48},"ViewAction",{"@type":50,"mainEntity":51},"FAQPage",[52,58,62],{"name":53,"@type":54,"acceptedAnswer":55},"What was the percentage of candidates who achieved an A* grade in the June 2021 Cambridge IPQ?","Question",{"text":56,"@type":57},"In the June 2021 series, 39.2% of candidates achieved an A* grade.","Answer",{"name":59,"@type":54,"acceptedAnswer":60},"How were the grading standards for the June 2021 session determined?",{"text":61,"@type":57},"The awarding standards were aligned with those of school-assessed grades and equivalent qualifications taken in England.",{"name":63,"@type":54,"acceptedAnswer":64},"What percentage of candidates remained ungraded for the Cambridge IPQ in June 2021?",{"text":65,"@type":57},"The percentage of candidates who were ungraded was 1.4%.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":68,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":40,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":70,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":72,"site_id":7},642301,1792721792,{"code":4,"msg":75,"data":76},"success",[77,81,85,89,94,99,104,108,113,116,120],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":78,"show_sort_weight":79,"slug":80},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":82,"show_sort_weight":83,"slug":84},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":86,"show_sort_weight":87,"slug":88},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":90,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":95,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":100,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},8,30,"research-report",{"id":109,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":115},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":118,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":119},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":121,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":122,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":123},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":75,"data":125},{"doc_id":72,"user_id":126,"nickname":37,"user_avatar":127,"doc_module":4,"category_id":105,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":128,"file_id":129,"file_url":130,"file_type":131,"file_size":132,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":22,"language":133,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":134,"faqs":135,"seo_title":136,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":73,"read_time":30},4398048949847,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002536579ef2da7f?_k=1778318612642679267","Cambridge IPQ candidate grades June 2021  \nCumulative world totals grades A* -E  \nThese figures may differ from those of previous June series. Mainly this is because of substantial differences in the profile of candidates entered. The awarding standard of exams in June 2021 was aligned to that of school-assessed grades and of equivalent qualifications taken in England.  \n% achieving  \nA*  \n% achieving A or above  \n% achieving B or above  \n% achieving C or above  \n% achieving D or above  \n% achieving E or above  \n% candidatesungraded  \nCambridge International Project Qualification 39.2 69.6 83.8 92.6 97.3 98.6 1.4  \nPlease note these grades may change following results enquiries. Page 1 of 1","cbCaingdM3i3CQGx","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaingdM3i3CQGx","pdf",26258,"English","# Cumulative Grade Statistics\n## Performance Breakdown by Grade","[{\"question\":\"What was the percentage of candidates who achieved an A* grade in the June 2021 Cambridge IPQ?\",\"answer\":\"In the June 2021 series, 39.2% of candidates achieved an A* grade.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the grading standards for the June 2021 session determined?\",\"answer\":\"The awarding standards were aligned with those of school-assessed grades and equivalent qualifications taken in England.\"},{\"question\":\"What percentage of candidates remained ungraded for the Cambridge IPQ in June 2021?\",\"answer\":\"The percentage of candidates who were ungraded was 1.4%.\"}]","Cambridge International Project Qualification Results Statistics - June 2021 | PDF"]