[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-651108-105":59,"doc-detail-651108-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","building-performance-simulation-supporting-typical-design-activities-the-case-of-organising-2d-layout","Building performance simulation supporting typical design activities - The case of ‘Organising 2D layout’","","The development of BPS tools for practice often relies on assumptions or misinterpretations of architects’ real needs during building design. This paper documents a co-creation workshop approach between researchers and design practitioners to support the simulation-driven activity “Organising 2D layout”. The outcome is a first usable tool enabling architects in Rhinoceros to visualize overheating risk and useful daylight illuminance directly within 2D layout sketches. The study also indicates that co-creation is essential for successful BPS integration.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/building-performance-simulation-supporting-typical-design-activities-the-case-of-organising-2d-layout/651108/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/building-performance-simulation-supporting-typical-design-activities-the-case-of-organising-2d-layout/651108.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"RizkyPratama_92","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-24",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem does the paper address about BPS tool adoption in design practice?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It argues that BPS tool development often depends on assumptions or wrong interpretations of what architects need, think, and do in the early design stage.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What design activity does the paper focus on for simulation-based support?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The paper focuses on “Organising 2D layout”, where the designer works with a building’s 2D layout inside a defined outer boundary.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the co-creation approach produce in practice?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The co-creation workshops lead to a first version of a tool that lets architects visualize overheating risk and useful daylight illuminance directly in their 2D layout sketches in Rhinoceros.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},651108,1792920615,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":29,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},962094243231,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Building performance simulation supporting typical design activities: The case of ‘Organising 2D layout'  \nSteffen Petersen 1, Mike Steen Kingo Danielsen 2, Pernille Klavsen3  \n1Aarhus University Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Aarhus, Denmark  \n2 Rambøll A/S, Aarhus, Denmark  \n3 C.F. Møller Architects, Aarhus, Denmark  \nAbstract  \nThe development of BPS tools for practice is often based on assumptions or wrong interpretations of what architects need, think, and do when they design buildings. This paper reports on the use of co-creation workshops between researchers and building design practitioners to enable simulation-based support for a design activity called “Organising 2D layout”. The result was the first version of a useful tool where architects easily can get a visualisation of the overheating risk and useful daylight illuminance directly in their 2D layout sketches in Rhinoceros. More generally, the paper illustrates that a co-creation process seems to be a key to the successful implementation of BPS in design practice.  \nKey Innovations  \n• Enabling the use of BPS in the design activity“Organising 2D layout”.  \n• Highly automated simulation procedure.  \n• Evidence that co-creation is a key to better integration of BPS in design practice.  \nPractical Implications  \nBuilding designers can now–with a few additional inputs to their 2D layout sketches – get a simulation-based assessment of overheating risk and useful daylight illuminance in multi-story residential apartment buildings.  \nIntroduction  \nDesigning buildings that provide thermal comfort, good indoor air quality, and good daylight conditions while fulfilling legislative requirements for energy performance is a critical task for building designers that need to be integrated into the decision-making process of the early design stage. The use of integrated thermal and daylight simulation tools for virtual performance evaluation of design proposals is ideal for this. The literature review in the paper by Purup and Petersen (2020a) identified and discussed many research-based efforts that seek to enhance the efficient use of such tools in the early design stage. They found that the predominant research approach is to propose workflows or procedures for integrating the tools in design practice. However, the uptake of these proposals in design practice seems to be rare. A reason could be that the research methods are chosen by researchers often are decoupled from design practice and proposals, therefore, are based on assumptions of, or they  \ninterpret wrong, what architects need, think, and do when they design – a concern also raised by Bleil de Souza (2011) . Furthermore, several researchers have identified various types of barriers for the uptake of BPS tools in design practice, e.g. Attia et al (2009), Kanters et al.(2014), and Petersen et al. (2014), such as ‘Tools are too complex’, ‘Tools are too expensive’, ‘Tools are not integrated into drawing software’, ‘Tools take too much time’ and ‘Tools not integrated into workflow’. As also highlighted by Clarke and Hensen (2015), there seems tobe a need for a research-based effort that investigates how to integrate the BPS tools into the actual design practice.  \nPurup and Petersen (2020a) consequently proposed a research framework to pursue the notion that tools must be conformed to fit common design practices in the early design stage – not vice versa. The research framework is based on existing and well-known research methodologies and approaches and is as such an attempt to help researchers to structure, conduct, and document practice-oriented research activities in a systematic manner. ¨  \nIn another paper, Purup and Petersen (2020b) reported on the use of the aforementioned framework to investigate the research question: How can tools for indoor climate and energy performance simulation be conformed to fit architectural design practice? The authors analysed data from semi-structured interviews ","cbCaiq4Inje3jCLI","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiq4Inje3jCLI","pdf",3549349,"English","# Abstract\n## Key Innovations\n## Practical Implications\n## Introduction\n## Method","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the paper address about BPS tool adoption in design practice?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that BPS tool development often depends on assumptions or wrong interpretations of what architects need, think, and do in the early design stage.\"},{\"question\":\"What design activity does the paper focus on for simulation-based support?\",\"answer\":\"The paper focuses on “Organising 2D layout”, where the designer works with a building’s 2D layout inside a defined outer boundary.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the co-creation approach produce in practice?\",\"answer\":\"The co-creation workshops lead to a first version of a tool that lets architects visualize overheating risk and useful daylight illuminance directly in their 2D layout sketches in Rhinoceros.\"}]","Building performance simulation supporting typical design activities - The case of ‘Organising 2D layout’ | PDF",1792862880,15]