[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-584441-105":59,"doc-detail-584441-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","building-evidence-what-comes-after-an-efficacy-study-technical-working-group-meeting-summary","Building Evidence - What Comes After an Efficacy Study - Technical Working Group Meeting Summary","","Technical working group meeting summary dated October 14, 2016, convened by the National Center for Special Education Research and the National Center for Education Research within the Institute of Education Sciences. The discussion addresses what effectiveness studies should achieve, challenges in initiating and completing them, and steps to encourage replication research. It also explores causal mechanisms, variability of impacts, and how IES training programs and a culture shift can advance evidence beyond efficacy, including transparency, implementation research, and researcher-practitioner partnerships.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/building-evidence-what-comes-after-an-efficacy-study-technical-working-group-meeting-summary/584441/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/building-evidence-what-comes-after-an-efficacy-study-technical-working-group-meeting-summary/584441.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"WPS_1786070896","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem does the meeting focus on after an efficacy study?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It examines how to support evidence advancement beyond efficacy, including what effectiveness studies should accomplish and what steps are needed to strengthen the research pathway.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which challenges and priorities are discussed for effectiveness studies?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The meeting considers challenges of initiating and completing effectiveness studies, the need for replication research, and ways to understand causal mechanisms and variability of impacts.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the group suggest IES can drive progress after efficacy has been established?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It calls for a culture shift in evaluating education interventions, emphasizing transparency in reporting methods and findings, implementation and replication research, and partnerships between researchers and practitioners.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},584441,1792167425,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},549768072016,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Building Evidence:  \nWhat Comes After an Efficacy Study?  \nTechnical Working Group Meeting Summary  \nOctober 14, 2016  \nNational Center for Special Education Research  \nNational Center for Education Research Institute of Education Sciences 550 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20202  \nTechnical Working Group Members  \nInvited Experts  \nMaureen Conroy, University of Florida  \nAnita Zucker Endowed Professor, Professor of Special Education and Early Childhood Studies, and Co-Director of the Anita Zucker Center for Excellence in Early Childhood Studies  \nFred Doolittle, MDRC  \nVice President  \nGreg Duncan, University of California, Irvine  \nDistinguished Professor of Education  \nMark Dynarski, Pemberton Research  \nFounder and President  \nDavid Francis, University of Houston  \nHugh Roy and Lillie Cranz Cullen Distinguished University Chair, Director of the Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, and Co-Director of the Center for Advanced Computing and Data Systems  \nRobert Granger, William T. Grant Foundation  \nFormer President  \nLarry Hedges, Northwestern University  \nBoard of Trustees Professor of Statistics and Professor of Educational and Social Policy  \nCarolyn Heinrich, Vanderbilt University  \nProfessor of Public Policy and Education and Professor of Economics  \nRobert Horner, University of Oregon  \nAlumni-Knight Endowed Professor of Special Education and Clinical Sciences and Director of the Department of Special Education and Community Supports  \nChristopher Lemons, Vanderbilt University  \nAssistant Professor of Special Education  \nRebecca Maynard, University of Pennsylvania  \nUniversity Trustee Professor of Education and Social Policy  \nJohn Pane, RAND Corporation  \nDistinguished Chair in Education Innovation and Senior Scientist  \nJohn Seeley, University of Oregon  \nProfessor of Special Education and Clinical Sciences  \nJeffrey Valentine, University of Louisville  \nAssociate Professor of Education, Counseling and Human Development  \nSharon Vaughn, University of Texas at Austin  \nProfessor of Special Education, Manuel J. Justiz Endowed Chair in Education, and Executive Director of the Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk  \nInstitute of Education Sciences Staff  \nElizabeth Albro, National Center for Education Research  \nAssociate Commissioner for Teaching and Learning  \nThomas Brock, National Center for Education Research  \nCommissioner  \nJacquelyn Buckley, National Center for Special Education Research  \nProgram Officer  \nChristina Chhin, National Center for Education Research  \nProgram Officer  \nEmily Doolittle, National Center for Education Research  \nProgram Officer  \nJoan McLaughlin, National Center for Special Education Research  \nCommissioner  \nAllen Ruby, National Center for Education Research  \nAssociate Commissioner for Policy and Systems  \nKatherine Taylor, National Center for Special Education Research  \nProgram Officer  \nWendy Wei, National Center for Education Research and National Center for Special Education Research  \nProgram Assistant  \nThe following meeting summary was edited by IES staff for clarity and consistency. Technical Working Group members were allowed to review and comment on it, and their corrections were incorporated. The views expressed in this document reflect both individual and collective opinions of the meeting participants and not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Education.  \nMeeting Summary  \nOn October 14, 2016, the National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) and the National Center for Education Research (NCER) in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) convened a group of experts to gain insights and advice on how best to support the advancement of evidence beyond an efficacy study (see Appendix A for agenda) . Discussion followed five topics of inquiry:  \n1. What should effectiveness studies accomplish? What are the challenges of initiating and completing an effectiveness study?  \n2. What steps are needed to encourage more replicat","cbCaioPMqj6vLt58","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioPMqj6vLt58","pdf",519363,17,"English","# Meeting Summary\n## Purpose and context of the meeting\n## Five topics of inquiry\n## Effectiveness studies at IES: an overview\n## Progression from efficacy to effectiveness","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the meeting focus on after an efficacy study?\",\"answer\":\"It examines how to support evidence advancement beyond efficacy, including what effectiveness studies should accomplish and what steps are needed to strengthen the research pathway.\"},{\"question\":\"Which challenges and priorities are discussed for effectiveness studies?\",\"answer\":\"The meeting considers challenges of initiating and completing effectiveness studies, the need for replication research, and ways to understand causal mechanisms and variability of impacts.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the group suggest IES can drive progress after efficacy has been established?\",\"answer\":\"It calls for a culture shift in evaluating education interventions, emphasizing transparency in reporting methods and findings, implementation and replication research, and partnerships between researchers and practitioners.\"}]","Building Evidence - What Comes After an Efficacy Study - Technical Working Group Meeting Summary | PDF",1792051009,43]