[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-274455-105":59,"doc-detail-274455-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","brief-of-amici-curiae-new-york-civil-liberties-union-and-education-law-center-in-support-of-plaintiffs-respondents","BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE - NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND EDUCATION LAW CENTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS","","Amici curiae New York Civil Liberties Union and Education Law Center submit this brief in support of plaintiffs-respondents in a New York Court of Appeals case involving claims under the New York State Constitution. The brief presents arguments that plaintiffs have stated a claim under Article XI, § 1, emphasizing an expansive view of relevant inputs, and addresses related issues concerning school resources, integration, and outputs. It also argues an equal protection claim under Article I, § 11, followed by a conclusion and compliance materials.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/brief-of-amici-curiae-new-york-civil-liberties-union-and-education-law-center-in-support-of-plaintiffs-respondents/274455/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/brief-of-amici-curiae-new-york-civil-liberties-union-and-education-law-center-in-support-of-plaintiffs-respondents/274455.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Bulrr","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",16,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Who are the amici curiae and what is their role in this case?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The amici curiae are the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Education Law Center. They file the brief in support of the plaintiffs-respondents.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What constitutional claim is addressed under Article XI, § 1?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The brief argues that the plaintiffs-respondents have stated a claim under Article XI, § 1 of the New York State Constitution, including a supporting view of inputs and related deficiencies.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What equal protection claim is asserted under Article I, § 11?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The brief argues that the plaintiffs-respondents have stated an equal protection claim under Article I, § 11, which is addressed in the argument section labeled as II, followed by a conclusion.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},274455,1789477542,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},5909892115043,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","| Court of Appeals\u003Cbr>State of New York\u003Cbr>INTEGRATENYC, INC., COALITION FOR EDUCATION JUSTICE, P. S. 132 PARENTS FOR CHANGE, A.C., H.D. EX REL. W.D., M.G. EX REL. M.G., L. S. EX REL. S.G., C.H. EX REL. C.H., Y.K.J. EX REL. Y.J., A.M., V.M. EX REL. J.M., R.N. EX REL. N.N., M.A. EX REL. F.P., S. S. EX REL. M. S., S.D. EX REL. S. S., K.T. EX REL. F.T. AND S.W. EX REL. B.W. ,\u003Cbr>Plaintiff-Appellant,\u003Cbr>(caption continued on next page) |  |\n| --- | --- |\n| BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE\u003Cbr>NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND EDUCATION LAW CENTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS\u003Cbr>RESPONDENTS |  |\n| NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION\u003Cbr>Stefanie D. Coyle\u003Cbr>Emma Curran Donnelly Hulse Arthur Eisenberg\u003Cbr>Molly K. Biklen\u003Cbr>125 Broad Street, 19th Floor New York, New York 10004\u003Cbr>Tel: (212) 607-3368\u003Cbr>Fax: (212) 607-3318\u003Cbr>[scoyle@nyclu.org](scoyle@nyclu.org) | EDUCATION LAW CENTER\u003Cbr>Wendy Lecker\u003Cbr>60 Park Place, Suite 300 Newark, New Jersey 07102\u003Cbr>Tel: (973) 624-1815\u003Cbr>Fax: (973) 624-7339\u003Cbr>[wlecker@edlawcenter.org](wlecker@edlawcenter.org) |\n| Court of Appeals Docket No. 2024-00099 Appellate Division, First Judicial Department Docket No. 2022-02719 New York County Supreme Court Index No. 152743/2021 |  |\n\n-against  \nTHE STATE OF NEW YORK, KATHY HOCHUL, as Governor of the State of New York, NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, BETTY A. ROSA, as New York State Commissioner of Education, BILL DE BLASIO, as Mayor of New York City,  \nDefendants-Appellants,-and  \nPARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION,  \nIntervenor-Defendant-Appellant.  \nDISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 500.1(f)  \nThe New York Civil Liberties Union hereby discloses that it is a non-profit, 501(c)(4) organization, and is the New York State affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union.  \nEducation Law Center hereby discloses that it is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization, and has no parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates.  \nPursuant to 22 NYCRR 500.23 (a) (4) , amici state that no other person or entity has contributed to the content, preparation, or submission of this brief. Additionally, no party, party’s counsel, or any other person or entity contributed money that was intended to fund preparation or submission of this brief.  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nDISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 500.1(f) ............................ i  \nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... ii  \nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................... 1  \nINTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ..............................................................................4  \nARGUMENT .............................................................................................................6  \nI. THE PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS HAVE STATED A CLAIM UNDER ARTICLE XI, § 1 OF THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION..................6  \nA. New York Precedent Supports an Expansive View of Inputs...................8  \n1. Deficiencies in Inputs – School Resources.............................................11  \n2. Deficiencies in Inputs – School Integration...........................................14  \n3. Deficiencies in Outputs...........................................................................21  \nII. The Plaintiffs-Respondents Have Stated an Equal Protection Claim Under Article I, § 11 of the New York State Constitution..............................................23  \nCONCLUSION ........................................................................................................28  \nCERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE .......................................................................30  \nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES  \nCases ................................................................................................................Page(s)  \nAbbott v Burke,119 NJ 287 [1990] ............................................................................5  \nAlevy v Downstate Med. Ctr. of State o","cbCaia286Spa3vu8","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaia286Spa3vu8","pdf",557418,37,"English","# Table of Contents\n## Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Rule 500.1(f)\n## Table of Authorities\n## Preliminary Statement\n## Interest of Amici Curiae\n## Argument\n## I. The Plaintiffs-Respondents Have Stated a Claim Under Article XI, § 1 of the New York State Constitution\n## A. New York Precedent Supports an Expansive View of Inputs\n## 1. Deficiencies in Inputs – School Resources\n## 2. Deficiencies in Inputs – School Integration\n## 3. Deficiencies in Outputs\n## II. The Plaintiffs-Respondents Have Stated an Equal Protection Claim Under Article I, § 11 of the New York State Constitution\n## Conclusion\n## Certificate of Compliance","[{\"question\":\"Who are the amici curiae and what is their role in this case?\",\"answer\":\"The amici curiae are the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Education Law Center. They file the brief in support of the plaintiffs-respondents.\"},{\"question\":\"What constitutional claim is addressed under Article XI, § 1?\",\"answer\":\"The brief argues that the plaintiffs-respondents have stated a claim under Article XI, § 1 of the New York State Constitution, including a supporting view of inputs and related deficiencies.\"},{\"question\":\"What equal protection claim is asserted under Article I, § 11?\",\"answer\":\"The brief argues that the plaintiffs-respondents have stated an equal protection claim under Article I, § 11, which is addressed in the argument section labeled as II, followed by a conclusion.\"}]","BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE - NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND EDUCATION LAW CENTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS | PDF",93]