[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33204":3,"doc-seo-33204":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33204,4398048949847,"Eliana","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002536579ef2da7f?_k=1778318612642679267",8,"Research & Report","Brain Activity During Observation of Actions: Influence of Action Content and Subject’s Strategy","PET mapped brain regions engaged by observing meaningful versus meaningless hand actions under four visually presented conditions. Participants viewed actions with two different goals: later recognition or later imitation. Action meaning produced distinct activation patterns and strong left/right asymmetries regardless of strategy. Meaningful actions recruited the left frontal and temporal hemisphere, while meaningless actions primarily engaged the right occipitoparietal pathway. Recognition intent preferentially activated memory-encoding structures, whereas imitation intent engaged planning and action-generation regions, showing dependence on executive demands and action properties.","cbCainxpZvpQIETi","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainxpZvpQIETi","pdf",959057,1,15,"English","en","# Summary\n## Experimental design\n## Key findings on meaning and hemispheric asymmetry\n## Strategy-dependent activation\n# Keywords and abbreviations\n# Introduction","[{\"question\":\"How did the study use PET to examine brain activity during action observation?\",\"answer\":\"PET was used to map brain regions linked to observing meaningful and meaningless hand actions presented visually across four experimental conditions.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the two viewing goals given to participants?\",\"answer\":\"Participants were instructed either to watch the actions to recognize them later or to watch them to imitate them later.\"},{\"question\":\"How did action meaning and observation strategy affect hemispheric brain activation?\",\"answer\":\"Meaningful actions increased left hemisphere activity in frontal and temporal regions, while meaningless actions mainly involved a right occipitoparietal pathway. Recognition intent activated memory-encoding structures, whereas imitation intent activated planning and action-generation regions.\"}]",1782204740,38,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"brain-activity-during-observation-of-actions-influence-of-action-content-and-subjects-strategy","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/brain-activity-during-observation-of-actions-influence-of-action-content-and-subjects-strategy/33204/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"How did the study use PET to examine brain activity during action observation?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"PET was used to map brain regions linked to observing meaningful and meaningless hand actions presented visually across four experimental conditions.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What were the two viewing goals given to participants?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Participants were instructed either to watch the actions to recognize them later or to watch them to imitate them later.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How did action meaning and observation strategy affect hemispheric brain activation?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"Meaningful actions increased left hemisphere activity in frontal and temporal regions, while meaningless actions mainly involved a right occipitoparietal pathway. Recognition intent activated memory-encoding structures, whereas imitation intent activated planning and action-generation regions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]