[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-271575-105":59,"doc-detail-271575-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","boa-staff-report-fredstrom-mine-appeal-part-1","BOA Staff Report - Fredstrom Mine Appeal - Part 1","","Board of Adjustment materials analyze an appeal regarding whether approval of Special Use Dockets SU-94-22, SU-94-23, and SU-94-24 has lapsed due to inactivity. The packet includes staff recommendation content and multiple exhibits such as inspection reports across years, neighbors permit amendment materials, appellant statements, and supplemental submittals. The document applies the Boulder County Land Use Code standard of review, evaluates interpretation and evidence of prior implementation, and considers the effect on the Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and land use intent.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/boa-staff-report-fredstrom-mine-appeal-part-1/271575/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/boa-staff-report-fredstrom-mine-appeal-part-1/271575.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Pentious","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the appeal about in AP-20-0001?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The appeal challenges the Director’s determination that Special Use approvals for SU-94-22, SU-94-23, and SU-94-24 lapsed due to inactivity.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What standard of review does the Board of Adjustment apply?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The Board considers the technical meaning of the provisions, past interpretation, rules of construction in Article 1 of the Land Use Code, and the effect on the Code’s intent and on the Comprehensive Plan and relevant agreements.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What background facts are central to the lapsed-permit dispute?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"BOCC Resolution 95-93 approved a multi-year sequential gravel mining plan and required a pod-based reclamation approach; mining and reclamation were completed for other sites, while no mining occurred on the Fredstrom site.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},271575,1789460904,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},1374404730887,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","# BOA Staff Report-Fredstrom Mine Appeal\n\nBOA Hearing October 7,2020 at 4:00 p.m  \n## PUBLIC HEARING\n\nSTAFF PLANNER:  \nDale Case,Community Planning and Permitting,Director &Zoning Administrator  \n## STAFF RECOMMENDATION RE:\n\n\n| Docket:   | AP-20-0001:Aggregate Appeal   |\n| --- | --- |\n| Request:   | Appeal of the determination by the Director of the Boulder County Planning  \u003Cbr>and Permitting Department(the \"Director\")that the special use approved by   |\n|  |  |\n|  | Boulder County Resolution 95-93 approving Dockets SU-94-0022,SU-94-   |\n|  | 0023 and SU-94-0024(the \"Resolution\")has lapsed due to inactivity.   |\n| Appellant:   | Aggregate Industries,WCR   |\n| Agent:   | Holland &Hart LLP   |\n\n## PACKET CONTENTS:\n\n\n| Pages  \u003Cbr>Item   |\n| --- |\n| o Staff Recommendation  \u003Cbr>1-12   |\n| A1-A83  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit A Neighbors Permit Amendment Application   |\n| B1-B7  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit B 2011 Neighbors Pit Inspection Report   |\n| C1-C4  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit C 2015 Neighbors Pit Inspection Report   |\n| D1-D28  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit D2018 Neighbors Pit Inspection Report   |\n| o Exhibit E 2008 DRMS Annual Report-Neighbors  \u003Cbr>E1-E3   |\n| o Exhibit F2010 DRMS Annual Report-Neighbors  \u003Cbr>F1-F3   |\n| o Exhibit G 2011 DRMS Annual Report -Neighbors  \u003Cbr>G1-G3   |\n| H1-H2  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit H1/11/10 Fredstrom Inspection Report   |\n| I1-I2  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit I 2/25/15 Fredstrom Inspection Report   |\n| o Exhibit J 11/5/19 Fredstrom Inspection Report  \u003Cbr>J1-J9   |\n| K1  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit K-Timeline   |\n| L1-L19  \u003Cbr>o Exhibit L-Appellant Statement of Appeal(submitted July 2020)   |\n| o Exhibit M-Appellant Exhibits to Statement of Appeal (submitted July 2020)  \u003Cbr>M1-M72   |\n| o Exhibit N-Appellant Supplemental Application Submittal(submitted Sept.  \u003Cbr>N1-N916  \u003Cbr>2020)   |\n| o Exhibit O-Appellant Supplemental Submittal Letter and Attachments(submitted  \u003Cbr>O1-0101  \u003Cbr>Sept.2020)   |\n\n## RECOMMENDATION\n\nUphold the Director's determination that approval of Special Use Dockets SU-94-22,23,  \nand 24 has lapsed under Article 4-604.C.of the Boulder County Land Use Code.  \n## STANDARD OF REVIEW\n\nArticle 4-1202.A.1.of the Boulder County Land Use Code(the“Code”)provides:  \nIn hearing an appeal of an administrative decision or interpretation,the Board ofAdjustment shall consider the following:  \na.the technical meaning of the provision being appealed;  \nb.evidence as to the past interpretation of the provision;  \nc.the principles of interpretation and rules of construction in Article 1 of this code;and  \nd.the effect of the interpretation on the intent of this Code and the implementationof the Comprehensive Plan and any applicable intergovernmental agreementaffecting land use or development.  \nThe principles of interpretation and rules of construction set forth in Article 1 of the Code,include,as applicable here:  \nThe provisions of this Code shall be regarded as the minimum requirements for theprotection of the public health,safety,and general welfare.This Code shall therefore beregarded as remedial and shall be liberally construed to further its underlying purposes.Article1-900.A.1.  \nThis Code is not intended to interfere or conflict with,abrogate,or annul any otherregulation,statute,or provision of law.Article 1-900.A.2.  \nWhenever a provision of this Code and a provision of any other law,ordinance,resolution,rule,or regulation of any kind,including another provision of this Code,contain any restrictions covering the same subject matter,the more restrictive shallgovern.Article 1-900.A.3.  \nWords and phrases shall be read in context and construed according to the rules ofgrammar and common usage.Words and phrases that have acquired a technical orparticular meaning,whether by legislative definition or otherwise,shall be construedaccordingly.Article 1-1000.A.1.  \nThe particular controls the general.Article 1-1000.A.2.  \n## BACKGROUND\n\nIn 1995,the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners(BOCC)approved Resolution95-93,which approved Special Use Dockets \\#SU-94-22(Neighbors/Redmon","cbCaioCwkBoVPsJx","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioCwkBoVPsJx","pdf",25300096,157,"English","# Public Hearing\n## Staff Recommendation\n## Recommendation\n## Standard of Review\n## Background\n## Analysis\n### A. Special Use Permits","[{\"question\":\"What is the appeal about in AP-20-0001?\",\"answer\":\"The appeal challenges the Director’s determination that Special Use approvals for SU-94-22, SU-94-23, and SU-94-24 lapsed due to inactivity.\"},{\"question\":\"What standard of review does the Board of Adjustment apply?\",\"answer\":\"The Board considers the technical meaning of the provisions, past interpretation, rules of construction in Article 1 of the Land Use Code, and the effect on the Code’s intent and on the Comprehensive Plan and relevant agreements.\"},{\"question\":\"What background facts are central to the lapsed-permit dispute?\",\"answer\":\"BOCC Resolution 95-93 approved a multi-year sequential gravel mining plan and required a pod-based reclamation approach; mining and reclamation were completed for other sites, while no mining occurred on the Fredstrom site.\"}]","BOA Staff Report - Fredstrom Mine Appeal - Part 1 | PDF",396]