[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-274017-105":59,"doc-detail-274017-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","biennial-performance-reports-2000-2001-state-assessment-data-summary","Biennial Performance Reports 2000-2001 State Assessment Data - Summary","","Biennial Performance Reports provide a consolidated summary of 2000-2001 state assessment participation and performance information submitted under IDEA Part B. The report synthesizes regular states and unique states across general and state alternate assessment systems, incorporating clarifications made during NCEO verification. Data are organized into four sections—participation and performance for general and alternate assessments—supported by state-by-state appendix tables. The document emphasizes how submitted data may not match public reporting and that original BPR values were not altered.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/biennial-performance-reports-2000-2001-state-assessment-data-summary/274017/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/biennial-performance-reports-2000-2001-state-assessment-data-summary/274017.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Dipper","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What sources does the summary use for the 2000-2001 assessment information?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The summary is based on state-submitted Biennial Performance Reports submitted to the U.S. Department of Education under IDEA Part B.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Did NCEO change any data from the original BPR reports?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"No. Clarifications made during NCEO verification are reflected, but no data values from the original BPR reports were changed.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How is the report organized regarding general and alternate assessments?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It summarizes 2000-2001 assessment participation and performance in four sections: participation in general assessments, participation in alternate assessments, performance in general assessments, and performance in alternate assessments.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},274017,1789474193,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},1374404997633,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Biennial Performance Reports: 2000-2001 State Assessment Data  \nSummary Prepared by:  \nMartha L. Thurlow, Hilda I. Wiley, and John Bielinski National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)  \nDecember 31, 2002  \nThe information in this summary is based on data submitted in states’ Biennial Performance Reports to the U.S. Department of Education. Any corrections or updates to those reports that were made after December 31, 2002 are not reflected in this summary.  \nOverview  \nStates and other educational entities receiving Part B funding under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) submitted their Biennial Performance Reports to the U.S. Secretary of Education on or before May 31, 2002. These reports contained information on a variety of indicators, including assessment participation and performance results for 2000-2001 state assessments. This report is a summary of the 2000-2001 state assessment information that was submitted by states in their Biennial Performance Reports. In some cases, states clarified data in their reports during NCEO’s verification process; those clarifications are reflected in this report. No data from the original BPR reports were changed.  \nIt is important to recognize that the information submitted in a state’s Biennial Performance Report may or may not be publicly reported by the state. The National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) regularly analyzes assessment information that is publicly reported by states (see Bielinski, Thurlow, Callender, & Bolt, 2001; Thurlow, Langenfeld, Nelson, Shin, & Coleman, 1998; Thurlow, Nelson, Teelucksingh, & Ysseldyke, 2000; Ysseldyke, Thurlow, Langenfeld, Nelson, Teelucksingh, & Seyfarth, 1998) . Analysis of public reports and Web sites containing 2000-2001 assessment data are reported by Thurlow, Wiley, and Bielinski (2002) .  \nThe assessment information included in the Biennial Performance Reports of regular states (n = 50) and unique states subject to IDEA requirements (n = 9) is summarized in four sections in this report:  \n• Participation in 2000-2001 General State Assessments (see page 2)  \n• Participation in 2000-2001 State Alternate Assessments (see page 9)  \n• Performance on 2000-2001 General State Assessments (see page 15)  \n• Performance on 2000-2001 State Alternate Assessments (see page 25)  \nThe information in the above sections is supported by state-by-state data in the appendices. Appendix A is a state-by-state listing of whether general assessment and alternate assessment participation and performance data were reported. Appendix B provides state-bystate information on the participation numbers used in this summary of Biennial Performance Report data. Appendix C displays general assessment performance for three grade ranges (3-5, 6-8, and 9-12) in reading, math, writing, and science for each state and the nine unique states. Data were selected for one grade in each of the levels; most often, the grades were 4, 8, and 10. Appendix D displays alternate assessment performance by the same three grades, for single overall alternate assessment scores, and alternate assessment scores for reading, math, and “other” areas.  \nMany additional analyses of the assessment data in the Biennial Performance Reports could be conducted. The data presented here are intended to give a basic picture of the assessment data that were included in the Biennial Performance Reports, and what those data indicate about the levels of participation and performance of students with disabilities in state general and alternate assessments.  \nAnalysis of 2000-2001 Biennial Performance Reports NCEO Report – Page 1  \nParticipation in 2000-2001 General State Assessments  \nOne table and four figures are included in this section. A brief description of overall findings is provided for each table and figure. In addition, the decisions that were made about the data included in these tables and figures are clarified here.  \nTable 1. Number of States with Any 2000-2001 Partici","cbCaibdx9MNvo6Gb","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaibdx9MNvo6Gb","pdf",371813,51,"English","# Overview\n## Data sources and verification approach\n## Structure of the four reporting sections\n# Participation in 2000-2001 General State Assessments\n## Table 1: number of states with any participation data\n## Figure 1: states with participation data for general assessments\n## Figure 2: states enabling calculation of participation rates","[{\"question\":\"What sources does the summary use for the 2000-2001 assessment information?\",\"answer\":\"The summary is based on state-submitted Biennial Performance Reports submitted to the U.S. Department of Education under IDEA Part B.\"},{\"question\":\"Did NCEO change any data from the original BPR reports?\",\"answer\":\"No. Clarifications made during NCEO verification are reflected, but no data values from the original BPR reports were changed.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the report organized regarding general and alternate assessments?\",\"answer\":\"It summarizes 2000-2001 assessment participation and performance in four sections: participation in general assessments, participation in alternate assessments, performance in general assessments, and performance in alternate assessments.\"}]","Biennial Performance Reports 2000-2001 State Assessment Data - Summary | PDF",129]