[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-115306-en":3,"doc-seo-115306-105":31,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":92},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":21,"is_downloadable":21,"audit_status":21,"page_count":22,"language":23,"language_code":24,"site_id":25,"html_lang":24,"table_of_contents":26,"faqs":27,"seo_title":28,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":29,"read_time":30},115306,962084925502,"Lucas Martin","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8",2,"Literature","Between Saying and Doing - Towards an Analytic Pragmatism","Between Saying and Doing sets out a reconciliation between pragmatism (both classical American and Wittgensteinian) and analytic philosophy. It examines how meaning depends on the use of linguistic expressions, balancing what one must do for something to count as saying with what one must say to specify those actions. The discussion links semantics and pragmatics and develops new approaches to empiricism, naturalism, and functionalism, addressing logic, artificial intelligence, and intentional relations between subjects and objects.","Between Saying and Doing:  \nTowards an Analytic Pragmatism  \nBetween Saying and Doing aims to reconcile pragmatism (in both its classical American and its Wittgensteinian forms) with analytic philosophy. It investigates the relations between the meaning of linguistic expressions and their use. Giving due weight both to what one has to do in order to count as saying various things and to what one needs to say in order to specify those doings, makes it possible to shed new light on the relations between semantics (the theory of the meanings of utterances and the contents of thoughts) and pragmatics (the theory of the functional relations among meaningful or contentful items). Among the vocabularies whose interrelated use and meaning are considered are: logical, indexical, modal, normative, and intentional vocabulary. As the argument proceeds, new ways of thinking about the classic analytic core programs of empiricism, naturalism, and functionalism are oʃered, as well as novel insights about the ideas of artiɹcial intelligence, the nature of logic, and intentional relations between subjects and objects.  \nRobert B. Brandom is Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh, a Fellow of the Center for the Philosophy of Science, and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. His interests centre on philosophy of  \nlanguage, philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of logic. He has published more than 50 articles on these and related areas and is the author of Making it Explicit and Tales of the Mighty Dead (Harvard University Press).  \n[OceanofPDF.com](OceanofPDF.com)  \nBetween Saying and Doing:  \nTowards an Analytic Pragmatism  \nRobert B. Brandom  \n[OceanofPDF.com](OceanofPDF.com)  \nGreat Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP  \nOxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,  \nand education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York  \nAuckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto  \nWith oɽces in  \nArgentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam  \nOxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries  \nPublished in the United States  \nby Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Robert B. Brandom 2008  \nThe moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker)  \nFirst published 2008  \nFirst published in paperback 2010  \nAll rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,  \nwithout the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate  \nreprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction  \noutside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,  \nOxford University Press, at the address above  \nYou must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data  \nData available  \nLibrary of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available  \nTypeset by Laserwords Private Limited, Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by  \nClays Ltd., Bungay, Suʃolk  \nISBN 978–0–19–954287–1 (Hbk.)  \nISBN 978–0–19–958554–0 (Pbk.)  \n10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1  \n[OceanofPDF.com](OceanofPDF.com)  \nInfond and loving memory, this work is dedicated to a great man, a great teacher, and a great friend,  \nRichard Rorty  \nfor whom I am still rewriting my dissertation.  \n[OceanofPDF.com](OceanofPDF.com)  \nContents Summary  \nPreface  \nAcknowledgements  \nList of Abbreviations  \n1 Extending the Project of Analysis  \n2 El","cbCaiptPtvNVXGHR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiptPtvNVXGHR","pdf",3389054,5,1,535,"English","en",105,"# Preface\n# Acknowledgements\n# List of Abbreviations\n# Extending the Project of Analysis\n## The classical project of analysis\n## The pragmatist challenge\n## Extending the project of analysis: pragmatically mediated semantic relations\n## Automata: Syntactic PV-sufficiency and VP-sufficiency\n## The Chomsky hierarchy and a syntactic example of pragmatic expressive bootstrapping\n## Looking ahead\n# Elaborating Abilities: The Expressive Role of Logic\n## Automata as algorithmically elaborating abilities\n## Transducing automata\n## Autonomous discursive practices, asserting, and inferring\n## Introducing conditionals\n## Characterizing logic: the logicist’s dilemma\n# Afterword: Philosophical Analysis and Analytic Philosophy\n# Bibliography\n# Subject Index\n# Name Index","[{\"question\":\"这本书要调和哪两种哲学传统？\",\"answer\":\"书中旨在调和实用主义（既包括经典的美国实用主义，也包括维特根斯坦式的形式）与分析哲学。\"},{\"question\":\"作者如何理解“说（saying）”与“意义”之间的关系？\",\"answer\":\"通过强调：要让某些内容被算作“说”，必须考察说者需要做什么；同时要明确这些做法又需要说出什么，从而把语言的意义与其使用联系起来。\"},{\"question\":\"本书讨论的核心主题包括哪些领域？\",\"answer\":\"围绕语义学与语用学的关系展开，并进一步探讨逻辑、模态与规范、人工智能以及主体与客体之间的意向关系。\"}]","Between Saying and Doing - Towards an Analytic Pragmatism | PDF",1785472265,824,{"code":4,"msg":32,"data":33},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":24,"slug":34,"title":13,"keywords":35,"description":14,"schema_data":36,"social_meta":87,"head_meta":89,"extra_data":91,"updated_unix":29},"between-saying-and-doing-towards-an-analytic-pragmatism","",{"@graph":37,"@context":86},[38,54,69],{"@type":39,"itemListElement":40},"BreadcrumbList",[41,45,48,51],{"item":42,"name":43,"@type":44,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":46,"name":47,"@type":44,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":44,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":44,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/between-saying-and-doing-towards-an-analytic-pragmatism/115306/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":24,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":63,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":64,"interactionStatistic":65},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":42,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-08-22","2026-07-31",true,{"@type":66,"interactionType":67,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":68},"ViewAction",{"@type":70,"mainEntity":71},"FAQPage",[72,78,82],{"name":73,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":75},"这本书要调和哪两种哲学传统？","Question",{"text":76,"@type":77},"书中旨在调和实用主义（既包括经典的美国实用主义，也包括维特根斯坦式的形式）与分析哲学。","Answer",{"name":79,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":80},"作者如何理解“说（saying）”与“意义”之间的关系？",{"text":81,"@type":77},"通过强调：要让某些内容被算作“说”，必须考察说者需要做什么；同时要明确这些做法又需要说出什么，从而把语言的意义与其使用联系起来。",{"name":83,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":84},"本书讨论的核心主题包括哪些领域？",{"text":85,"@type":77},"围绕语义学与语用学的关系展开，并进一步探讨逻辑、模态与规范、人工智能以及主体与客体之间的意向关系。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":88,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":90,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":93},[94,98,101,105,109,114,119,124,129,132,136],{"id":21,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":120,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":125,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":126,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":128},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":130,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":131},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":133,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":134,"show_sort_weight":133,"slug":135},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":137,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":138,"show_sort_weight":20,"slug":139},19,"General","general"]