[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-32046":3,"doc-seo-32046":28},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":25,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":26,"read_time":27},32046,4398048950312,"Violet","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002538284de19e3c?_k=1778320343897328908",8,"Research & Report","Bentham On Democracy Courts And Codification","Bentham On Democracy, Courts, and Codification gathers the latest scholarship on Jeremy Bentham’s late and mature constitutional thought, drawing on original manuscripts and The Collected Works. The chapters examine themes ranging from official aptitude and women’s interests to courts, codification, and cosmopolitanism. It challenges the view, grounded in early jurisprudence, that Bentham’s constitutional theory is authoritarian, instead presenting a distinctive liberal perspective on democracy. The collection also clarifies Bentham’s concepts for modern readers through accessible exposition.","cbCaiawS5d7YktTi","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiawS5d7YktTi","pdf",2675303,10,1,404,"English","en","# Overview\n## Constitutional Thought and Liberal Democracy\n## Courts, Codification, and Cosmopolitanism\n## Reassessing Authoritarian Readings\n## Making Bentham’s Ideas Accessible","[{\"question\":\"What topics does the collection cover regarding Bentham’s constitutional thought?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses courts, codification, cosmopolitanism, and related themes such as official aptitude and women’s interests, drawing on Bentham’s later writings.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the collection reinterpret Bentham’s constitutional theory?\",\"answer\":\"It challenges the established early-jurisprudence notion that Bentham was authoritarian and argues for his distinctive liberal constitutional perspective.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the collection emphasize making Bentham’s writings more accessible?\",\"answer\":\"It reframes Bentham’s dense wording and unfamiliar terminology, helping readers engage with his subtle and important ideas on liberal democracy.\"}]",1780693355,1018,{"code":4,"msg":29,"data":30},"ok",{"site_id":31,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":26},105,"bentham-on-democracy-courts-and-codification","",{"@graph":35,"@context":85},[36,53,68],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,50],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":48,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":49},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":51,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":52},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/bentham-on-democracy-courts-and-codification/32046/",4,{"url":51,"name":13,"@type":54,"author":55,"headline":13,"publisher":57,"fileFormat":60,"description":14,"dateModified":61,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":60,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":56},"Person",{"url":40,"name":58,"@type":59},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-15","2026-06-05",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What topics does the collection cover regarding Bentham’s constitutional thought?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"It addresses courts, codification, cosmopolitanism, and related themes such as official aptitude and women’s interests, drawing on Bentham’s later writings.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"How does the collection reinterpret Bentham’s constitutional theory?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"It challenges the established early-jurisprudence notion that Bentham was authoritarian and argues for his distinctive liberal constitutional perspective.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"Why does the collection emphasize making Bentham’s writings more accessible?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"It reframes Bentham’s dense wording and unfamiliar terminology, helping readers engage with his subtle and important ideas on liberal democracy.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":51,"og:type":87,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":58,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":51},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":31}]