[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33097":3,"doc-seo-33097":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33097,3848291630094,"Emma Wilson","https://eur-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45",2,"Literature","Beauty Restored Mary Mothersill","Beauty Restored by Mary Mothersill presents an argument in aesthetics focused on problems of art criticism and the philosophical interest they carry. The preface credits Arnold Isenberg for showing how key issues dividing formalists and their opponents in painting aesthetics can be laid to rest through a strategy of simplicity and step-by-step treatment. Mothersill develops the direction further by clarifying the import of evaluative terms and reexamining Kant’s Critique of Judgment to ground a general aesthetic theory.","cbCairQHGHbR2XSY","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairQHGHbR2XSY","pdf",26363552,1,452,"English","en","# Acknowledgments\n# Preface\n## Isenberg’s approach to aesthetics and critical judgment\n## Objectivity, reasons, and the phenomenological task\n## Emotivism, communication, and the critic–audience project\n## Toward a general aesthetic theory and Kant’s model","[{\"question\":\"What motivates Mothersill’s investigation in the field of aesthetics and art criticism?\",\"answer\":\"Mothersill is persuaded by Arnold Isenberg that aesthetic problems can be unearthed with great philosophical interest, and that some of them are solvable through a focused, case-by-case approach.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the preface distinguish critical judgment from causal explanation of taste?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that justifying or giving reasons for critical judgments refers to something that happens in the world and is different from causal explanations of tastes and preferences, even if criticism had no truth or falsity.\"},{\"question\":\"What role does Kant’s Critique of Judgment play in the development of the proposed theory?\",\"answer\":\"Mothersill treats Kant’s Critique of Judgment as the only credible model for building a general aesthetic theory, using the conjunction of the Thesis and Antithesis in Kant’s Antinomy of Taste as a starting point.\"}]",1782202552,696,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":25},105,"beauty-restored-mary-mothersill","",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/beauty-restored-mary-mothersill/33097/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What motivates Mothersill’s investigation in the field of aesthetics and art criticism?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"Mothersill is persuaded by Arnold Isenberg that aesthetic problems can be unearthed with great philosophical interest, and that some of them are solvable through a focused, case-by-case approach.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"How does the preface distinguish critical judgment from causal explanation of taste?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"It argues that justifying or giving reasons for critical judgments refers to something that happens in the world and is different from causal explanations of tastes and preferences, even if criticism had no truth or falsity.",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"What role does Kant’s Critique of Judgment play in the development of the proposed theory?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"Mothersill treats Kant’s Critique of Judgment as the only credible model for building a general aesthetic theory, using the conjunction of the Thesis and Antithesis in Kant’s Antinomy of Taste as a starting point.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]