[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-199484-105":59,"doc-detail-199484-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","basic-principles-for-assessing-compatibility-of-new-spectrum-allocations-release-11-december-11-2015","Basic Principles for Assessing Compatibility of New Spectrum Allocations - Release 1.1 - December 11, 2015","","This white paper presents basic principles for assessing compatibility when allocating new spectrum and protecting existing services from harmful interference. It frames interference as a product of both transmitting and receiving characteristics across infrequency, space, and time, emphasizing planning for non-harmful interference and the unpredictability of electromagnetic environments. The paper assigns responsibilities to receivers, system layers, and transmitters, and links regulatory actions to quantitative analysis, transparency, and reproducibility.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/basic-principles-for-assessing-compatibility-of-new-spectrum-allocations-release-11-december-11-2015/199484/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/basic-principles-for-assessing-compatibility-of-new-spectrum-allocations-release-11-december-11-2015/199484.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Kyle","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-09-04",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What overall compatibility challenge does the white paper address?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It addresses how to assess whether new spectrum allocations can coexist with nearby services without causing harmful interference, while maintaining expected availability and quality.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the paper define harmful interference assessment?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"It treats harmful interference as dependent on both transmitting service characteristics and nearby receiving service characteristics, including variability over infrequency, space, and time.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What responsibilities does the document assign to receivers, systems, and transmitters?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Receivers must mitigate interference outside their assigned channels, systems are expected to use mitigation techniques across layers, and transmitters must minimize energy leaking outside assigned frequencies and licensed areas.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},199484,1788506114,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},3985741905716,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","Basic Principles for Assessing Compatibility of New Spectrum Allocations  \nA White Paper  \nSpectrum and Receiver Performance Working Group*  \nFCC Technological Advisory Council  \nRelease 1.1  \nDecember 11, 2015  \n* Gregory Lapin (Principal Author and Co‐Chair), Lynn Claudy (Co‐Chair), Kumar Balachandran, Robert Dalgleish, Pierre De Vries, David Gurney, Dale Hatfield, Bruce Judson, Stephen Kuffner, Geoffrey Mendenhall, Robert Miller. FCC Liaisons: Matthew Hussey, Julius Knapp, Uri Livnat,  \nRobert Pavlak.  \nContents  \n1. Executive Summary................................................................................................................................... 3  \nDefinitions................................................................................................................................................. 4  \nHarmful Interference ................................................................................................................................ 5  \nInterference Limits.................................................................................................................................... 7  \n2. Interference Realities................................................................................................................................ 7  \nPrinciple 1: Harmful interference is affected by the characteristics of both a transmitting service and a nearby receiving service infrequency, space or time............................................................................... 8  \nPrinciple 2: All services should plan for non‐harmful interference from signals that are nearby infrequency, space or time, both now and for any changes that occur in the future.................................. 8  \nPrinciple 3: Even under ideal conditions, the electromagnetic environment is unpredictable. Operators should expect and plan for occasional service degradation or interruption. The Commission should not base its rules on exceptional events.......................................................................................................... 9  \nPropagation Variations ......................................................................................................................... 9  \nTemporary Intermodulation ............................................................................................................... 10  \nService Outages................................................................................................................................... 12  \n3. Responsibilities of Services ..................................................................................................................... 13  \nPrinciple 4: Receivers are responsible for mitigating interference outside their assigned channels...... 14  \nPrinciple 5: Systems are expected to use techniques at all layers of the stack to mitigate degradation from interference.................................................................................................................................... 15  \nPrinciple 6: Transmitters are responsible for minimizing the amount of their transmitted energy that appears outside their assigned frequencies and licensed areas............................................................. 17  \n4. Regulatory Requirements and Actions ................................................................................................... 18  \nPrinciple 7: Services under FCC jurisdiction are expected to disclose the relevant standards, guidelines and operating characteristics of their systems to the Commission if they expect protection from harmful interference............................................................................................................................... 18  \nIncreasing Automation of Interference Resolution ............................................................................ 19  \nPrinciple 8: The Commission may apply Interference Limits to","cbCaios4zVDUziGt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaios4zVDUziGt","pdf",455902,32,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Definitions\n## Harmful Interference\n## Interference Limits\n# Interference Realities\n## Principle 1\n## Principle 2\n## Principle 3\n## Propagation Variations\n## Temporary Intermodulation\n## Service Outages\n# Responsibilities of Services\n## Principle 4\n## Principle 5\n## Principle 6\n# Regulatory Requirements and Actions\n## Principle 7\n## Increasing Automation of Interference Resolution\n## Principle 8\n## Determining Interference Limits\n## Principle 9\n## Recommendation: Transparency & Reproducibility\n# Examples\n## Example 1: The Cellular Near-Far Problem\n## Example 2: Aggregate Interference Analysis for Coexistence\n# Summary\n## Acknowledgements","[{\"question\":\"What overall compatibility challenge does the white paper address?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses how to assess whether new spectrum allocations can coexist with nearby services without causing harmful interference, while maintaining expected availability and quality.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the paper define harmful interference assessment?\",\"answer\":\"It treats harmful interference as dependent on both transmitting service characteristics and nearby receiving service characteristics, including variability over infrequency, space, and time.\"},{\"question\":\"What responsibilities does the document assign to receivers, systems, and transmitters?\",\"answer\":\"Receivers must mitigate interference outside their assigned channels, systems are expected to use mitigation techniques across layers, and transmitters must minimize energy leaking outside assigned frequencies and licensed areas.\"}]","Basic Principles for Assessing Compatibility of New Spectrum Allocations - Release 1.1 - December 11, 2015 | PDF",81]