[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31428":3,"doc-seo-31428":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31428,16904993612988,"Olivia Brown","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",8,"Research & Report","Autofusion in Early-Onset Scoliosis Growing Constructs: Occurrence, Risk Factors, and Impacts","The study evaluates autofusion (AF) occurring during growing rod instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis, focusing on incidence, causes, severity, and clinical impact. A prospective cohort of EOS patients treated between 2016 and 2021 underwent growing rod implantation, repeated lengthenings, and posterior spinal fusion, with Cobb angle and spinal length tracking. AF was graded (I–V) to distinguish low- and high-grade disease. AF risk and protective factors were quantified using odds ratios and correlation analyses.","cbCaiib02VgkkYI9","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiib02VgkkYI9","pdf",617812,1,9,"English","en","# Abstract\n# Introduction\n# Methods\n# Results\n# Conclusions","[{\"question\":\"What are the main aims of this study on autofusion in growing rod constructs?\",\"answer\":\"The study quantifies the frequency and severity of autofusion, identifies risk factors, and assesses how autofusion influences final curve correction and spinal lengthening.\"},{\"question\":\"How was autofusion assessed and graded in the study?\",\"answer\":\"Autofusion was evaluated and assigned a grade from I to V, where grades I–II represent low-grade AF and grades III–V represent high-grade AF.\"},{\"question\":\"Which factors increased or reduced the risk of autofusion?\",\"answer\":\"Risk factors included growing rod age under 8, any interval open procedures, and residual curve over 30° after index growing rods. Protective factors included preoperative spinal length over 30.0 cm and the use of index magnetically controlled growing rods.\"}]",1779483644,23,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"autofusion-in-early-onset-scoliosis-growing-constructs-occurrence-risk-factors-and-impacts","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/autofusion-in-early-onset-scoliosis-growing-constructs-occurrence-risk-factors-and-impacts/31428/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What are the main aims of this study on autofusion in growing rod constructs?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The study quantifies the frequency and severity of autofusion, identifies risk factors, and assesses how autofusion influences final curve correction and spinal lengthening.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How was autofusion assessed and graded in the study?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Autofusion was evaluated and assigned a grade from I to V, where grades I–II represent low-grade AF and grades III–V represent high-grade AF.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Which factors increased or reduced the risk of autofusion?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"Risk factors included growing rod age under 8, any interval open procedures, and residual curve over 30° after index growing rods. Protective factors included preoperative spinal length over 30.0 cm and the use of index magnetically controlled growing rods.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]