[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-595502-105":59,"doc-detail-595502-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","australian-universities-review-a-new-era-for-research-education-in-australia","Australian Universities’ Review - A new era for research education in Australia?","","讨论澳大利亚研究教育如何在“澳大利亚研究评估”（ERA）框架下受到影响，指出ERA以回顾性衡量科研质量、而研究教育是前瞻性的，且ERA使用的2位与4位研究领域与高校组织单元之间存在错配。文中分析不同学科（STEM相对更高、HASS差异更大）与不同地区的评价结果可能带来分配与激励的非预期后果，并评估ERA在博士培养、发表激励与研究学生发展上的潜在不利影响。同时回顾ERA的设定目标、历史沿革与2010评估机制。",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/australian-universities-review-a-new-era-for-research-education-in-australia/595502/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/australian-universities-review-a-new-era-for-research-education-in-australia/595502.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Well Done","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-09","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"ERA如何同时影响研究质量评价与研究教育的实践？","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"ERA以回顾性方式衡量研究质量，而研究教育需要前瞻性安排；两者时间取向不一致。文中还指出领域划分与高校组织单元存在错配，从而影响政策与实践落地。","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"ERA 2010使用了哪些学科聚类与研究领域划分？",{"text":117,"@type":113},"ERA 2010将评估范围按八个学科聚类组织，并依据澳新研究领域分类（ANZSRC）中的2位与4位研究领域界定各聚类内的学科。",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"ERA评价采用的指标与评分规则是什么？",{"text":121,"@type":113},"各领域基于“仪表盘”指标进行评估，包含研究质量、规模与活动、应用与声望等；评分为五点量表，3代表世界标准，且低于关键质量门槛的机构在该领域会被标记为“未评估”。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},595502,1792295938,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},5909892210082,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/56001069da27c9f41e8?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1789614185077863061","A U S T R A L I A N U N I V E R S I T I E S ’ R E V I E W  \nA new era for research education in Australia?  \nHelene Marsh James Cook University  \nBradley Smith James Cook University  \nMax King Monash University  \nTerry Evans Deakin University  \nUse of the Australian research assessment exercise, Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) to influence the policy and practice of research education in Australia will undoubtedly have many consequences, some of them unintended and potentially deleterious. ERA is a retrospective measure of research quality; research education is prospective. There is a lack of alignment between the 2-and especially the 4-digit Fields of Research used for ERA and university organisational units. While numerous Fields of Research were rated as world class in multiple institutions in the capital cities of New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland, the other states and regional Australia have significant gaps. The Sciences, Technology, Engineering and Medical (STEM) fields were generally rated higher than the Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences (HASS) disciplines. Thus using ERA results to allocate higher degree by research places will have highly variable consequences in different disciplines and locations, given the obstacles to the mobility of the largely mature-aged doctoral cohort and the forecast impending academic skills shortage. ERA provides an incentive for Australian academics to eschew publishing in low impact journals and is likely to disadvantage some research students for whom co-authorship in a lower impact journal is more advantageous than no publication. There are many ways in which ERA results could be used to improve the quality of research education in Australia. Nonetheless, simplistically limiting doctoral education to Fields of Research where an institution scored at or better than national or world averages in ERA is unlikely to be in the national interest because our future research and academic workforce needs to be well prepared to operate across the nation in areas of emerging research, including cross-disciplinary and applied research.  \nExcellence in Research for Australia (ERA) is designed to provide a comprehensive review of the quality of research undertaken in Australian higher education institutions at regular intervals. The first ERA was conducted in 2010 (Australian Research Council, 2011a), the second will be conducted in 2012 and the third is planned for 2016. ERA was a successor to the Research Quality Framework  \n(RQF) (DEST, 2005); an initiative prompted by political scepticism about the claims/assertions that universities made about the value of and returns on national investment in research. In implementing ERA, Australia follows several other countries, including the United Kingdom (RAE, 2008), New Zealand (PBRF, 2012), Hong Kong (French, Massy & Young 2001), which have conducted  \nvol. 54, no. 1, 2012 A new era for research education in Australia?, Helene Marsh et al. 83  \nA U S T R A L I A N U N I V E R S I T I E S ’ R E V I E W  \nnational assessments of the quality of research based on various criteria.These overseas assessment exercises have been used to guide research funding in response to concerns about the affordability of funding all higher education institutions for research as higher education has moved from an elite to a mass system (Elton, 2000) . However, the outcomes have not always been as policy makers intended. For example, in the United Kingdom, the exercise, which was aimed at concentrating research in fewer institutions and departments, confirmed that many of the newer universities were producing quality research and many universities used their freedom of virement to fund lower-rated departments at the expense of higher-rated ones (Elton, 2000) .  \nIn ERA 2010, each of the 41 Australian Higher Education Providers was invited to provide evidence of research quality, volume, application and esteem across eight disciplinary clusters: (1) ","cbCaiqwueA8shiwo","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqwueA8shiwo","pdf",170918,11,"English","# Introduction\n## Potential consequences of ERA\n# Background and rationale of ERA\n## Relationship to RQF\n## International precedents\n# ERA 2010 design and scope\n## Disciplinary clusters and Fields of Research\n## Evaluation committees and indicators\n## Rating scale and assessment rules\n# Assessment approach and concerns\n## Transparency and weight of input factors\n## Discipline undervaluation concerns","[{\"question\":\"ERA如何同时影响研究质量评价与研究教育的实践？\",\"answer\":\"ERA以回顾性方式衡量研究质量，而研究教育需要前瞻性安排；两者时间取向不一致。文中还指出领域划分与高校组织单元存在错配，从而影响政策与实践落地。\"},{\"question\":\"ERA 2010使用了哪些学科聚类与研究领域划分？\",\"answer\":\"ERA 2010将评估范围按八个学科聚类组织，并依据澳新研究领域分类（ANZSRC）中的2位与4位研究领域界定各聚类内的学科。\"},{\"question\":\"ERA评价采用的指标与评分规则是什么？\",\"answer\":\"各领域基于“仪表盘”指标进行评估，包含研究质量、规模与活动、应用与声望等；评分为五点量表，3代表世界标准，且低于关键质量门槛的机构在该领域会被标记为“未评估”。\"}]","Australian Universities’ Review - A new era for research education in Australia? | PDF",1792081276,28]