[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-498833-105":59,"doc-detail-498833-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","argumentative-performance-task-writing-rubric-grades-6-11-organizationpurpose","Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 - 11) - Organization/Purpose","","Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric for Grades 6–11 outlines assessment criteria for Organization/Purpose. It scores responses from 4 to 1 and NS (insufficient) based on structural clarity, paragraph unity, introduction and conclusion quality, logical progression, and the strength of connections among ideas. It also evaluates purpose and audience focus, use of transitional strategies, and whether opposing arguments are acknowledged according to grade-level expectations.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/argumentative-performance-task-writing-rubric-grades-6-11-organizationpurpose/498833/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/argumentative-performance-task-writing-rubric-grades-6-11-organizationpurpose/498833.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"WPS_1786070896","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How does the rubric define Organization/Purpose at the highest level (Score 4)?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Score 4 requires a clear, effective organizational structure with unity and completeness. The claim is introduced, communicated clearly, and maintained for the purpose and audience with logical progression, strong connections, and effective transitions.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What distinguishes Score 3 from Score 2 in Organization/Purpose?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Score 3 maintains an evident organizational structure with coherence, a mostly clear claim, and adequate transitions. Score 2 shows an inconsistent or somewhat sustained structure, some drift in focus, and only partial or uneven transitions or weak connections.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"When does acknowledging opposing viewpoints begin according to the rubric?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The rubric notes that acknowledging and/or addressing opposing point of view begins at grade 7.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},498833,1791095478,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":81,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":39,"preview_page_count":4},549768072016,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 – 11) Organization/Purpose  \n\n| Score | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | NS |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Organization/Purpose | The response has a clear and | The response has an evident | The response has an | The response has little or no | • Insufficient |\n|  | effective organizational structure, creating a sense of | organizational structure anda sense of completeness. | inconsistent organizational structure. Some flaws are | discernible organizational structure. The response may | (includes copied text) |\n|  | unity and completeness. The | Though there may be minor | evident, and some ideas may | be related to the claim but |  |\n|  | organization is fully sustained | flaws, they do not interfere | be loosely connected. The | may provide little or no | • In a language |\n|  | between and within | with the overall coherence. | organization is somewhat | focus: | other than |\n|  | paragraphs. The response is | The organization is | sustained between and within |  | English |\n|  | consistently and purposefully | adequately sustained | paragraphs. The response |  |  |\n|  | focused: | between and within | may have a minor drift in | • claim may be confusing | • Off-topic |\n|  | • claim is introduced, | paragraphs. The response is | focus: | or ambiguous; response |  |\n|  | clearly communicated, | generally focused: | • claim may be somewhat | may be too brief or the | • Off-purpose |\n|  | and the focus is strongly | • claim is clear, and the | unclear, or the focus may | focus may drift from the |  |\n|  | maintained for the | focus is mostly maintained | be insufficiently sustained | purpose and/or |  |\n|  | purpose and audience | for the purpose and | for the purpose and/or | audience |  |\n|  |  | audience | audience |  |  |\n|  | • consistent use of a |  |  | • few or no transitional |  |\n|  | variety of transitional | • adequate use of | • inconsistent use of | strategies are evident |  |\n|  | strategies to clarify the | transitional strategies with | transitional strategies |  |  |\n|  | relationships between | some variety to clarify | and/or little variety | • introduction and/or |  |\n|  | and among ideas | relationships between |  | conclusion may be |  |\n|  |  | and among ideas | • introduction or conclusion, | missing |  |\n|  | • effective introduction |  | if present, may be weak |  |  |\n|  | and conclusion | • adequate introduction and conclusion | • uneven progression of | • frequent extraneous ideas may be evident; |  |\n|  | • logical progression of |  | ideas from beginning to | ideas may be randomly |  |\n|  | ideas from beginning to | • adequate progression of | end; and/or formulaic; | ordered or have unclear |  |\n|  | end; strong connections | ideas from beginning to | inconsistent or unclear | progression |  |\n|  | between and among | end; adequate | connections among ideas |  |  |\n|  | ideas with some syntactic | connections between |  | • alternate and opposing |  |\n|  | variety | and among ideas | • alternate and opposing argument(s) may be | argument(s) may not be acknowledged * |  |\n|  | • alternate and opposing | • alternate and opposing | confusing or not |  |  |\n|  | argument(s) are clearly | argument(s) are | acknowledged * |  |  |\n|  | acknowledged or | adequately |  |  |  |\n|  | addressed* | acknowledged or |  |  |  |\n|  |  | addressed* |  |  |  |\n\n*Acknowledging and/or addressing opposing point of view begins at grade 7.  \nArgumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 – 11) Evidence/Elaboration  \n| Score | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | NS |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Evidence/Elaboration | The response provides thorough and convincing elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim and argument(s)\u003Cbr>including reasoned, in-depth analysis and the effective use of source material. The response clearly and effectively develops ideas, using precise language.\u003Cbr>• comprehensive evidence (facts and details) from the source material is integrated","cbCaiuOZs9I1iaSG","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuOZs9I1iaSG","pdf",124321,"English","# Organization/Purpose\n## Scoring Levels (4, 3, 2, 1, NS)\n## Focus, Unity, and Transitions\n## Introduction/Conclusion and Logical Progression\n## Opposing Arguments (Grade-Level Note)\n# Evidence/Elaboration\n## Scoring Levels (4, 3, 2, 1, NS)","[{\"question\":\"How does the rubric define Organization/Purpose at the highest level (Score 4)?\",\"answer\":\"Score 4 requires a clear, effective organizational structure with unity and completeness. The claim is introduced, communicated clearly, and maintained for the purpose and audience with logical progression, strong connections, and effective transitions.\"},{\"question\":\"What distinguishes Score 3 from Score 2 in Organization/Purpose?\",\"answer\":\"Score 3 maintains an evident organizational structure with coherence, a mostly clear claim, and adequate transitions. Score 2 shows an inconsistent or somewhat sustained structure, some drift in focus, and only partial or uneven transitions or weak connections.\"},{\"question\":\"When does acknowledging opposing viewpoints begin according to the rubric?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric notes that acknowledging and/or addressing opposing point of view begins at grade 7.\"}]","Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 - 11) - Organization/Purpose | PDF",1790989458]