[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33071":3,"doc-seo-33071":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33071,3848291630094,"Emma Wilson","https://eur-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45",2,"Literature","Arguing About War Yale University Press 2006","Arguing About War Yale University Press 2006 examines how arguments about war are constructed, justified, and contested in public discourse. The work focuses on reasoning processes, evidence standards, and rhetorical strategies that shape perspectives on conflict. It considers how different viewpoints support or challenge claims about military action and the conditions under which war can be defended. Emphasis falls on structured debate, critical evaluation of justifications, and the implications of persuasive framing for policy and public understanding.","cbCaiboVDk4J9doJ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiboVDk4J9doJ","pdf",790089,1,225,"English","en","# Key Themes in Debating War\n## Argument Structure and Reasoning\n## Evidence, Rhetoric, and Justification\n## Competing Viewpoints on Conflict","[{\"question\":\"What is the central focus of Arguring About War?\",\"answer\":\"The central focus is how arguments about war are formed, evaluated, and contested in debate and public reasoning.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the book treat war-related claims and justifications?\",\"answer\":\"It examines the standards of support for claims about war, including how evidence and reasoning are used to defend or challenge those claims.\"},{\"question\":\"Why do rhetorical strategies matter in discussions of war?\",\"answer\":\"Rhetorical framing can shape how audiences interpret motives, legitimacy, and the conditions under which war is considered acceptable.\"}]",1782202179,347,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":25},105,"arguing-about-war-yale-university-press-2006","",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/arguing-about-war-yale-university-press-2006/33071/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What is the central focus of Arguring About War?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"The central focus is how arguments about war are formed, evaluated, and contested in debate and public reasoning.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"How does the book treat war-related claims and justifications?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"It examines the standards of support for claims about war, including how evidence and reasoning are used to defend or challenge those claims.",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"Why do rhetorical strategies matter in discussions of war?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"Rhetorical framing can shape how audiences interpret motives, legitimacy, and the conditions under which war is considered acceptable.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]