[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-295304-105":59,"doc-detail-295304-en":134},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":127,"head_meta":129,"extra_data":131,"updated_unix":133},105,"en","application-is-works-to-trees-section-211-refusal","Application is Works to Trees - Section 211 - Refusal","","Decision outcome for an application under Works to Trees (TPO application) regarding a tree at 221 Tolcarne Drive, Pinner (Tree Preservation Order TPO 532A, species Hawthorn). The officer recommends refusal because no measurements were provided to show the extent of the requested crown reduction. The report evaluates the tree’s amenity value as low to moderate and highlights likely detrimental impact on visual amenity and the area’s arboreal character, with specific guidance to resubmit using clear meter reductions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":126},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/application-is-works-to-trees-section-211-refusal/295304/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/application-is-works-to-trees-section-211-refusal/295304.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Stanford","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118,122],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why was the application refused?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The application was refused because it did not include measurements indicating the extent of the crown reduction requested.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What tree and works were being requested?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The proposal related to a Hawthorn tree subject to TPO 532A, with requested works described as crown reduction.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What amenity value did the report give the tree?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The tree’s amenity value was assessed as low to moderate, based on its condition (fair, semi-mature) and location on the eastern boundary.",{"name":123,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":124},"What should be included if the applicant resubmits?",{"text":125,"@type":113},"The applicant should resubmit with a clear indication in meters showing how much crown will be removed (e.g., overall crown reduction of -2m, or height/lateral reductions in meters).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":128,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":130,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":132,"site_id":62},295304,1790083005,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":135},{"doc_id":132,"user_id":136,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":137,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":138,"file_id":139,"file_url":140,"file_type":141,"file_size":142,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":143,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":144,"faqs":145,"seo_title":146,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":147,"read_time":148},2336477552062,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","77769/TRE/2026/125  \nApplication is Works to Trees-Section 211  \n(Application Tye TRE)  \nThe Officer has checked the application in accordance with the planning policies and recommends the application for- Refusal  \nA  \nItem No. Report of the Interim Director of Planning, Regeneration & Public Realm  \nAddress: 221 TOLCARNE DRIVE PINNER  \nDevelopment: TPO 532A T3 1x Hawthorn Carry out height reduction and lateral pruning back  \nto site boundary to prevent encroachment over private drive.  \nLBH Ref Nos: 77769/TRE/2026/125  \nDrawing Nos: Sketch plan  \nDate Plans received: 15-05-2026 Date(s) of Amendments(s):  \nDate Application valid 15-05-2026  \n1.0 SITE \\ PROPERTY DESIGNATION  \nTree Preservation Order(s) Yes-532A  \n2.0 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY  \n2.01 Additional Planning History Comments  \n2.02 Planning History  \n3.0 PLANNING POLICIES AND STANDARDS  \n3.01 Relevant UDP Policies (ref. nos. only)  \nIn deciding TPO applications the local planning authority is not required to have regard to the development plan (Guide to the law and good practice-tree preservation orders, DETR 2000-paragraph 6.46 page 25)  \n3.02 Relevant Supplementary Planning Guidance  \n3.03 Other Key Documents  \n4.0 CONSULTATIONS  \n4.01 Neighbours  \nNo Comments Received.  \nOfficer Comments:  \n(for refusals specify nos. consulted nos. of responses and nature of responses. )  \n4.02 Residents Association(s) / Amenity Group(s)  \nNo Comments Received.  \nOfficer Comments:  \n4.03 Conservation Area Advisory Panel  \nNo Comments Received.  \nOfficer Comments:  \n4.04 Councillor(s) / MPs  \nNo Comments Received.  \nOfficer Comments:  \n4.05 Other(s)  \nNo Comments Received.  \nOfficer Comments:  \n5.0 KEY PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS  \n5.01 Introduction  \nThis decision is based on whether or not the proposal is justified, having regard to the reasons put forward in support of it, having assessed the amenity value of the trees and the likely impact of the proposal on the visual of the locality.  \n5.02 Description of trees and requested works  \nTPO No-532A  \nSpecies-Hawthorn  \nCondition / Age-Fair / Semi-mature  \nAmenity value-Low to moderate  \nWork requested-Crown reduction  \nReasons for work-Encroachment onto neighboring driveway  \n5.03 Amenity  \nThe tree is located on the eastern boundary of the Pinner Driving Test Centre. The semi-mature tree appears to be in a fair condition and can be viewed from neighbouring properties and by visitors to the Test Centre. Considering the condition and location, the tree has a low to moderate amenity value.  \n5.04 Appraisal  \nThis application has been refused as there has been no measurements as to the extent of the crown reduction. Please resubmit with a clear indication in meters as to how much crown will be removed, i.e. -2m overall crown reduction, or 2m reduction of height / 1.5m lateral reduction etc.  \n6.05 Conclusion  \nHaving regard to the reasons given for the proposed work, the work is unjustified and may have a detrimental impact on the visual amenity and arboreal character of the area.  \n7.0. RECOMMENDATION  \nREFUSAL for the following reasons:  \nINFORMATIVES  \n1. I99 Non Standard Informative  \nThe tree is located on the eastern boundary of the Pinner Driving Test Centre. The semi-mature tree appears to be in a fair condition and can be viewed from neighbouring properties and by visitors to the Test Centre. Considering the condition and location, the tree has a low to moderate amenity value.  \nThis application has been refused as there has been no measurements as to the extent of the crown reduction. Please resubmit with a clear indication in meters as to how much crown will be removed, i.e. -2m overall crown reduction, or 2m reduction of height / 1.5m lateral reduction etc.  \nHaving regard to the reasons given for the proposed work, the proposal is unjustified and may have a detrimental impact on the visual amenity and arboreal character of the area.  \n2. IT01 Removal of dead wood  \nThe removal of deadwood, dangerous / hanging branches and ","cbCaikwknDcODjSZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikwknDcODjSZ","pdf",395643,"English","# 1.0 Site / Property designation\n# 2.0 Relevant planning history\n# 3.0 Planning policies and standards\n# 4.0 Consultations\n# 5.0 Key planning considerations\n## 5.02 Description of trees and requested works\n## 5.03 Amenity\n## 5.04 Appraisal\n# 7.0 Recommendation\n## Refusal for the following reasons\n# Informatives","[{\"question\":\"Why was the application refused?\",\"answer\":\"The application was refused because it did not include measurements indicating the extent of the crown reduction requested.\"},{\"question\":\"What tree and works were being requested?\",\"answer\":\"The proposal related to a Hawthorn tree subject to TPO 532A, with requested works described as crown reduction.\"},{\"question\":\"What amenity value did the report give the tree?\",\"answer\":\"The tree’s amenity value was assessed as low to moderate, based on its condition (fair, semi-mature) and location on the eastern boundary.\"},{\"question\":\"What should be included if the applicant resubmits?\",\"answer\":\"The applicant should resubmit with a clear indication in meters showing how much crown will be removed (e.g., overall crown reduction of -2m, or height/lateral reductions in meters).\"}]","Application is Works to Trees - Section 211 - Refusal | PDF",1789717331,13]