[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-343740-105":59,"doc-detail-343740-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","ap-european-history-2016-question-1-document-based-question-scoring-guidelines","AP® European History 2016 - Question 1 - Document-Based Question Scoring Guidelines","","AP® European History 2016 Question 1 document-based question scoring guidelines outline the rubric for evaluating student responses. The framework awards points across thesis and argument development, document analysis, contextualization and evidence beyond the documents, and synthesis. It specifies requirements for thesis defensibility, cohesive argumentation reflecting historical complexity, use of document content and author significance, placement and completeness of required components, and clarity/accuracy expectations for timed exam first drafts.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/ap-european-history-2016-question-1-document-based-question-scoring-guidelines/343740/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/ap-european-history-2016-question-1-document-based-question-scoring-guidelines/343740.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Ivy","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-08","2026-09-22",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What determines points for the thesis and argument development in Question 1?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"Points depend on whether the response presents a historically defensible thesis that addresses all parts of the question and whether it develops a cohesive argument accounting for historical complexity through relationships among evidence.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How is the document analysis section scored?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Students earn points for using the content of at least six documents to support the thesis or argument, and for explaining the significance of viewpoint, purpose, historical context, and/or audience for at least four documents.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What is required to earn the contextualization and evidence beyond the documents points?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Contextualization requires explaining broader relevant historical developments using knowledge not found in the documents, while evidence beyond the documents requires a specific additional piece of evidence beyond the documents that supports or qualifies the argument.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},343740,1790156182,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":145,"read_time":146,"preview_page_count":4},549758252649,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000253669c5317157?_k=1778319167496531819","AP®EUROPEAN HISTORY2016 SCORING GUIDELINES  \n# Question 1—Document-Based Question\n\n“Evaluate whether the policies of Otto von Bismarck's govemment represented traditional conservatism ora new kind of conservatism in nineteenth-century Europe.”  \nMaximum Possible Points:7  \nPlease note:  \n·Each point of the rubric is earned independently,e.g.,a student could earn the point forargument development without earning the point for thesis.  \n·Unique evidence from the student response is required to earn each point,e.g.,evidence in thestudent response that qualifies for the contextualization point could not be used to earn thepoint for synthesis or the point for sourcing the documents.  \n## A.Thesis and Argument Development(2 points)\n\nTargeted Skill:Argumentation(E1,E4,and C1)  \n1 pointPresents a thesis that makes a historically defensible claim and responds to all parts of thequestion.The thesis must consist of one or more sentences located in one place,either inthe introduction or the conclusion.  \nScorina Note:Neither the introduction nor the conclusion is necessarily limited to a single paragraph.  \n1 pointDevelops and supports a cohesive argument that recognizes and accounts for historicalcomplexity by explicitly illustrating relationships among historical evidence such ascontradiction,corroboration,and/or qualification.  \n0 pointsNeither presents a thesis that makes a historically defensible claim and responds to allparts of the question nor develops and supports a cohesive argument that recognizes andaccounts for historical complexity.  \nIs completely blank  \n## B.Document Analysis(2 points)\n\nTargeted Skill:Analyzing Evidence:Content and Sourcing(A1 and A2)andArgumentation(E2)  \n1 pointUtilizes the content of at least six of the documents to support the stated thesis or arelevant argument.  \n1 point  \nExplains the significance of the author's point of view,author's purpose,historical context,and/or audience for at least four documents.  \n# AP®EUROPEAN HISTORY2016 SCORING GUIDELINES\n\nQuestion 1—Document-Based Question(continued)  \n0 pointsNeither utilizes the content of at least six of the documents to support the stated thesis or arelevant argument nor explains the significance of the author's point of view,author'spurpose,historical context,and/or audience for atleast four documents.  \n一Is completely blank  \nC.Using Evidence Beyond the Documents(2 points)Targeted Skill:Contextualization(C3)and Argumentation(E3)  \n## Contextualization\n\n1 pointSituates the argument by explaining the broader historical events,developments,orprocesses immediately relevant to the question.  \n0 pointsDoes not situate the argument by explaining the broader historical events,developments,or processes immediately relevant to the question.  \nScoring Note:Contextualization requires using knowledge not found in the documents to situate theargument within broader historical events,developments,or processes immediately relevant to thequestion.The contextualization point is notawarded for merely a phrase or reference,but insteadrequires an explanation,typically consisting of multiple sentences or a full paragraph.  \n## Evidence Beyond the Documents\n\n1 pointProvides an example or additional piece of specific evidence beyond those found in thedocuments to support or qualify the argument.  \n0 pointsDoes not provide an example or additional piece of specific evidence beyond those found inthe documents to support or qualify the argument.  \nIs completely blank  \n一  \n## Scoring Notes:\n\n·  This example must be different from the evidence used to earn other points on this rubric.  \n·  This point is not awarded for merely a phrase or reference.Responses need to reference anadditional piece of specific evidence and explain how that evidence supports or qualifies theargument.  \n# AP®EUROPEAN HISTORY2016 SCORING GUIDELINES\n\nQuestion 1—Document-Based Question(continued)  \n## D.Synthesis(1 point)\n\nTargeted Skill:Synthesis(C4,C5,or C6)  \n1 point  \nExtends the argument by ex","cbCaijugGW1lARpO","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijugGW1lARpO","pdf",5719368,26,"English","# Question 1—Document-Based Question\n## A. Thesis and Argument Development\n## B. Document Analysis\n## C. Using Evidence Beyond the Documents\n## Contextualization\n## Evidence Beyond the Documents\n## D. Synthesis\n## Scoring Notes","[{\"question\":\"What determines points for the thesis and argument development in Question 1?\",\"answer\":\"Points depend on whether the response presents a historically defensible thesis that addresses all parts of the question and whether it develops a cohesive argument accounting for historical complexity through relationships among evidence.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the document analysis section scored?\",\"answer\":\"Students earn points for using the content of at least six documents to support the thesis or argument, and for explaining the significance of viewpoint, purpose, historical context, and/or audience for at least four documents.\"},{\"question\":\"What is required to earn the contextualization and evidence beyond the documents points?\",\"answer\":\"Contextualization requires explaining broader relevant historical developments using knowledge not found in the documents, while evidence beyond the documents requires a specific additional piece of evidence beyond the documents that supports or qualifies the argument.\"}]","AP® European History 2016 - Question 1 - Document-Based Question Scoring Guidelines | PDF",1790051994,66]