[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-312226-105":59,"doc-detail-312226-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","ap-euro-leq-rubric-updated-september-2023","AP EURO LEQ RUBRIC - Updated September 2023","","AP European History LEQ scoring rubric updated September 2023 outlining expectations for writing a historically defensible essay response. It details required components: contextualization tied to broader historical developments, a thesis/claim that establishes a line of reasoning, evidence and support with at least two specific historical examples (earning 1–2 points), and analysis and reasoning using historical reasoning like comparison, causation, or CCOT plus demonstrating complex understanding through sophisticated argumentation and effective evidence use.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/ap-euro-leq-rubric-updated-september-2023/312226/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/ap-euro-leq-rubric-updated-september-2023/312226.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Xiajie","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-20",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What qualifies for the contextualization point on the LEQ rubric?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The response must connect the prompt to broader historical events, developments, or processes occurring before, during, or after the question’s time frame. It is not awarded for merely a phrase or a reference.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How many specific historical examples are required for the evidence/support category?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"To earn one point, the response must identify at least two specific historical examples. To earn two points, it must use at least two pieces of specific historical evidence to support an argument in response to the prompt.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What kinds of historical reasoning count for the analysis and reasoning category?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The rubric expects historical reasoning such as comparison, causation, or CCOT to frame or structure the argument. It also rewards demonstrating complex understanding through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective evidence use.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},312226,1790101151,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":81,"preview_page_count":4},8814010472675,"https://avatar.qwps.com/avatar/WGlhamll","AP EURO LEQ RUBRIC  \nUpdated September 2023  \nName:  \n____________________________  \nLEQ Topic:    \nCONTEXTUALIZATION  \nDescribes a broader historical context relevant to the prompt.  \nThe response must relate the topic of the prompt to broader historical events, developments, or processes that occur before, during, or continue after the time frame of the question.  \nThis point is not awarded for merely a phrase or a reference.  \nTHESIS / CLAIM  \nResponds to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis / claim that establishes a line of reasoning.  \nThe thesis must make a claim that responds to the prompt, rather than merely restating or rephrasing the prompt. The thesis must consist of one or more sentences located in one place, either in the introduction or the conclusion.  \nEVIDENCE & SUPPORT FOR ARGUMENT (Must Earn 1 to Earn 2)  \n1. Provides at least two SPECIFIC EXAMPLES of evidence relevant to the topic of the prompt.  \nTo earn one point, the response must identify at least two specific historical examples of evidence relevant to the topic of the prompt.  \n2. SUPPORTS AN ARGUMENT in response to the prompt using at least two specific and relevant examples of evidence.  \nTo earn two points the response must use specific at least two pieces of historical  \nevidence to support an argument in response to the prompt. ANALYSIS AND REASONING (Must Earn 1 to Earn 2)  \n1. Uses HISTORICAL REASONING (e.g. comparison, causation, CCOT)  \nto frame or structure an argument that addresses the prompt.  \nTo earn the first point, the response must demonstrate the use of historical reasoning to frame or structure an argument, although the reasoning might be uneven or imbalanced, or the evidence may be overly general or lacking specificity.  \n2. Demonstrates a COMPLEX UNDERSTANDING of the historical development that is the focus of the prompt through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective use of evidence.  \nSOPHISTICATED ARGUMENTATION   EFFECTIVE USE OF EVIDENCE  \n􀁆 Exploring nuance by analyzing multiple  􀁆 Using evidence effectively to themes or perspectives demonstrate a sophisticated  \n􀁆 Explbothaincoinngtinbuothitysaimndilachriaty angen, dbdifferenceoth causes,  undperseprstaectinding of dves relevaiffentrteontthe TOTAL POINTS: / 6  \nand effects, multiple causes or effects, prompt  \nmultiple similarities or differences, or ~~ ~~ 􀁆 Explaining how at least  \nmultiple continuities or changes  four pieces of specific and  \n􀁆 Explaining relevant and insightful relevant evidence support  \nconnections within and across periods a nuanced or complex  \nor geographical areas argument that responds to  \nthe prompt  \nComplex understanding can be demonstrated in any portion of the essay, but not merely by a single phrase or reference.","cbCaij00mUV6hbA5","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaij00mUV6hbA5","pdf",231423,"English","# LEQ Topic: Contextualization\n# Thesis / Claim\n# Evidence & Support for Argument\n# Analysis and Reasoning","[{\"question\":\"What qualifies for the contextualization point on the LEQ rubric?\",\"answer\":\"The response must connect the prompt to broader historical events, developments, or processes occurring before, during, or after the question’s time frame. It is not awarded for merely a phrase or a reference.\"},{\"question\":\"How many specific historical examples are required for the evidence/support category?\",\"answer\":\"To earn one point, the response must identify at least two specific historical examples. To earn two points, it must use at least two pieces of specific historical evidence to support an argument in response to the prompt.\"},{\"question\":\"What kinds of historical reasoning count for the analysis and reasoning category?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric expects historical reasoning such as comparison, causation, or CCOT to frame or structure the argument. It also rewards demonstrating complex understanding through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective evidence use.\"}]","AP EURO LEQ RUBRIC - Updated September 2023 | PDF",1789895487]