[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-610643-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-610643-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","annexure-c-evaluation-rubric-for-the-workplan-project-plan-project-plan-evaluation-scoring","Annexure C - Evaluation Rubric for the Workplan/ Project Plan - Project Plan Evaluation Scoring","","Annexure C provides an evaluation rubric to score a workplan/project plan across three core dimensions: deliverables, milestones, and timelines. For each dimension, the rubric defines performance bands from Very Low through Low, Medium, Satisfactory, and High score, with point values attached. Criteria emphasize clarity and completeness of intended outcomes and beneficiaries, alignment of milestones to deliverables and phases, and the realism and feasibility of sequencing and dependencies within the proposed timelines.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/annexure-c-evaluation-rubric-for-the-workplan-project-plan-project-plan-evaluation-scoring/610643/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/annexure-c-evaluation-rubric-for-the-workplan-project-plan-project-plan-evaluation-scoring/610643.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Pentious","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-01","2026-10-19",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What criteria are used to evaluate clearly defined project deliverables?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The rubric checks whether deliverables are clearly defined, whether intended outcomes are comprehensive, whether beneficiary numbers are appropriate, and whether the implementation approach is detailed and feasible.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How are project milestones assessed in the rubric?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"Milestones are scored based on whether they are provided and aligned to the project requirements, linked to the deliverables and phases, and whether sequencing and interdependencies are clearly defined and feasible.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"What factors determine the score for project timelines?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Timelines are evaluated on whether they cover all deliverables, whether critical dependencies are specified, and whether sequencing is logical and timelines appear realistic and feasible.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},610643,1792984010,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":26,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":96},1374404730887,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","Annexure C: Evaluation Rubric for the Workplan/ Project Plan  \n\n|  | Very Low | Low | Medium | Satisfactory | High score |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Clearly defined project deliverables: | No information included on the intended outcomes,(0 points) | Limited information included on the intended outcomes Project plan covers 1–2 deliverables , lacking clarity and sufficient detail.(5 points) | Information sufficient to understand intended outcomes. Project plan covers 3 out of 5 deliverables, with limited detail and unclear processes. (10 points) | Most deliverables covered (4 out of 5) with adequate detail; one deliverable is weak or lacks sufficient detail.(15 points) | All 5 deliverables are clearly defined. Intended outcomes are comprehensive. Beneficiary numbers are appropriate. Implementation approach is detailed and feasible. (20 points) |\n| Clearly defined project milestones: | Milestones not provided or not aligned to project requirements (0 points) | Milestones partially provided and unclear. Major gaps exist in alignment to the 5 deliverables. Feasibility questionable. (2 points) | Milestones cover most phases linked to the 5\u003Cbr>deliverables, but minor gaps exist and feasibility remains uncertain.(5 points) | Milestones are aligned to all 5 deliverables and major project phases. Sequencing is logical and generally clear, but limited detail is provided on interdependencies. Feasibility appears reasonable. (10 points) | Milestones are comprehensive and fully aligned to all 5\u003Cbr>deliverables and project phases. Sequencing and interdependencies are clearly defined. Milestones are detailed, realistic, and clearly feasible. (15 points) |\n\n\n|  | Very Low | Low | Medium | Satisfactory | High score |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Clearly defined project timelines: | No information\u003Cbr>was provided\u003Cbr>on the project timelines.(0 points) | Limited information is provided on the project timelines, but many milestoneshave not been included and the critical dependencies are not specified and reaching the proposed timelines does not seem feasible.\u003Cbr>(1 point) | Timelines provided for most of the 5 deliverables, but critical dependencies not specified. Feasibility questionable. (2 points) | Timelines provided for all 5 deliverables. Critical dependencies specified, but feasibility may present challenges. (4 points) | Detailed timelines provided for all 5\u003Cbr>deliverables. Dependencies clearly specified. Sequencing logical. Timelines appear realistic and feasible. (5 points) |","cbCaijzwpPV7cDcD","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijzwpPV7cDcD","pdf",111070,"English","# Clearly defined project deliverables\n# Clearly defined project milestones\n# Clearly defined project timelines","[{\"question\":\"What criteria are used to evaluate clearly defined project deliverables?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric checks whether deliverables are clearly defined, whether intended outcomes are comprehensive, whether beneficiary numbers are appropriate, and whether the implementation approach is detailed and feasible.\"},{\"question\":\"How are project milestones assessed in the rubric?\",\"answer\":\"Milestones are scored based on whether they are provided and aligned to the project requirements, linked to the deliverables and phases, and whether sequencing and interdependencies are clearly defined and feasible.\"},{\"question\":\"What factors determine the score for project timelines?\",\"answer\":\"Timelines are evaluated on whether they cover all deliverables, whether critical dependencies are specified, and whether sequencing is logical and timelines appear realistic and feasible.\"}]","Annexure C - Evaluation Rubric for the Workplan/ Project Plan - Project Plan Evaluation Scoring | PDF",1792379169]