[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-596618-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-596618-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","anatomy-of-a-tuition-freeze-part-42-read-online-free","Anatomy of a Tuition Freeze - Part 42 - read online free","","Using Kingdon’s multiple streams model and the advocacy coalition framework, this case study reconstructs the detailed history of Ontario’s 2004 tuition freeze. It analyzes social, political, and economic influences behind the policy decision and explains how Liberal Party action reflected stakeholder relations, public opinion, and brokerage politics aimed at electoral success. The study further shows how implementation strategy depended on aligning major institutions and coalition preferences within the broader policy community.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/anatomy-of-a-tuition-freeze-part-42-read-online-free/596618/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/anatomy-of-a-tuition-freeze-part-42-read-online-free/596618.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Muffet","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What frameworks guide the study of Ontario’s tuition freeze?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The paper applies Kingdon’s multiple streams model and the advocacy coalition framework to interpret how the tuition policy change emerged and evolved.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Which factors influenced policymakers in the 2004 tuition freeze decision?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The study highlights social, political, and economic factors, emphasizing stakeholder relations, public opinion, and brokerage politics as drivers of the Liberal Party’s choice.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How was the policy case study conducted and what data were used?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The research used a case study design with systematic investigation, including archival and documentary content analysis and interviews conducted between September 2011 and January 2012.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},596618,1792175039,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":127,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962090768927,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","CSSHE  \nSCÉES  \nCanadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d’enseignement supérieur Volume 45, No. 2, 2015, pages 41-59  \nAnatomy of a Tuition Freeze: The Case of Ontario Deanna Rexe  \nSimon Fraser University  \nAbstract  \nUsing two conceptual frameworks from political science—Kingdon’s (2003) multiple streams model and the advocacy coalition framework (Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith, 1993)—this case study examines the detailed history of a major tuition policy change in Ontario in 2004: a tuition freeze. The paper explores the social, political, and economic factors that influenced policymakers on this particular change to shed light on the broader questions ofthe dynamics of postsecondary policymaking. The study found that the Liberal Party’s decision to freeze postsecondary tuition fees was a function of stakeholder relations, public opinion, and brokerage politics, designed for electoral success.  \nThe policy implementation strategy was intended to facilitate the cooperation and interests ofthe major institutions. Within the broader policy community, student-organized interest groups and other policy advocates were aligned ina policy preference, a critical component for successful change.  \nRésumé  \nÀ l’aide de deux cadres conceptuels en science politique, le modèle à volets multiples de Kingdon (2003) et le cadre de coalitions de défense de Sabatier et Jenkins-Smith (1993), la présente étude de cas examine l’histoire détailléed’un changement majeur en matière de politique de frais de scolarité qui a eu lieu en Ontario en 2004 : le gel des frais de scolarité . Le présent article examine les facteurs sociaux, politiques et économiques qui ont dirigé certains responsables politiques vers ce changement particulier, afin defaire la lumière sur les questions plus générales portant sur la dynamique de  \nCJHE / RCES Volume 45, No. 2, 2015  \nAnatomy of a Tuition Freeze / D. Rexe 42  \nl’élaboration de politiques en matièred’enseignement postsecondaire. L’étude conclut que la décision du parti Libéral de geler les frais de scolarité des études postsecondaires relevait de relations avec les intervenants, d’opinion publique et de politique de médiation, dans le but de remporter les élections.  \nLa stratégie de mise en œuvre de la politique visait à faciliter la coopérationet les intérêts entre institutions d’envergure. Au sein d’une communauté politique plus large, des groupes d’intérêt étudiants et d’autres défenseurs dela politique partageaient la même préférence politique, un élément essentiel à la réussite de ce changement.  \nIntroduction  \nIn the struggle over ideas of accessibility and affordability, tuition fee policy is an active and contested area in Canadian postsecondary policymaking. Recent public attention and interest mobilization on tuition fee policy raises important questions regarding what is known about provincial policy formation and decision-making processes. Despite widespread changes to government regulatory policies on postsecondary tuition in all Canadian provinces, there is little understanding of how postsecondary policies are determined.  \nThe study of the policy process endeavours to explain causal relationships for policy development and adoption—an aim particularly important in the growing area of policy and politics in higher education research. Within a context of international calls for further scholarship of the policy process in higher education (Enders, 2004; McLendon, 2003; McLendon & Hearn, 2003), Canadian scholars have contributed important analyses of federal policymaking in postsecondary education (Wellen, Axelrod, Desai-Trilokekar, & Shanahan, 2012), and federal influence on provincial postsecondary policymaking (Fisher et al., 2006; Fisher, Rubenson, Jones, & Shanahan, 2009; Shanahan & Jones, 2007) . Others have explored forces influencing policymaking in different Canadian provinces (Jones, 1997; Padure & Jones, 2009), some focusing on Ontario specifically (Axelrod, Shanahan, Wellen, & ","cbCaivV8R8iO3XW1","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivV8R8iO3XW1","pdf",449847,"English","# Abstract\n# Résumé\n# Introduction\n## Accessibility and affordability debate\n## Purpose of the study and case design\n## Data collection and interview approach","[{\"question\":\"What frameworks guide the study of Ontario’s tuition freeze?\",\"answer\":\"The paper applies Kingdon’s multiple streams model and the advocacy coalition framework to interpret how the tuition policy change emerged and evolved.\"},{\"question\":\"Which factors influenced policymakers in the 2004 tuition freeze decision?\",\"answer\":\"The study highlights social, political, and economic factors, emphasizing stakeholder relations, public opinion, and brokerage politics as drivers of the Liberal Party’s choice.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the policy case study conducted and what data were used?\",\"answer\":\"The research used a case study design with systematic investigation, including archival and documentary content analysis and interviews conducted between September 2011 and January 2012.\"}]","Anatomy of a Tuition Freeze - Part 42 - read online free | PDF",1792083411,48]