[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-273701-105":59,"doc-detail-273701-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","an-agentic-approach-for-active-data-collection-travel-behavior-modeling-and-weather-sensitive-demand-prediction-arxiv-260820320-abstract","An Agentic Approach for Active Data Collection, Travel Behavior Modeling, and Weather-Sensitive Demand Prediction - arXiv 2608.20320 - Abstract","","Travel-behavior research increasingly combines digital data collection with predictive modeling, yet these stages are often developed and evaluated separately. The study introduces and applies a three-agent workflow that unifies conversational data collection, structured data processing, and behavioral prediction. A chatbot-administered, image-augmented stated-preference survey captured mode choices from 92 student commuters under five weather scenarios. Weather effects are analyzed with multinomial logit, while logistic regression and random forest provide machine-learning benchmarks. Multiple locally deployed LLMs are tested across prompt, persona, few-shot, and vision configurations, showing that habitual travel information, prompting strategy, demonstrations, and visual context can improve LLM-based travel-choice prediction.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/an-agentic-approach-for-active-data-collection-travel-behavior-modeling-and-weather-sensitive-demand-prediction-arxiv-260820320-abstract/273701/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/an-agentic-approach-for-active-data-collection-travel-behavior-modeling-and-weather-sensitive-demand-prediction-arxiv-260820320-abstract/273701.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Sage","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-17","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What problem does the study address in travel-behavior research?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It addresses the gap between digital data-collection methods and predictive modeling by integrating them into a single coordinated workflow rather than treating them as separate stages.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How was the travel data collected in the study?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The study used a chatbot-administered, image-augmented stated-preference survey to collect mode choices from 92 student commuters across five weather scenarios.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"Which modeling approaches and LLM setups were evaluated?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Weather associations were modeled with multinomial logit, and benchmarks included logistic regression and random forest. Nine locally deployed LLMs were evaluated under zero-shot, persona, few-shot, and vision-based configurations using the same weather images.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},273701,1789472566,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},687197207057,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","arXiv : 2608 .20320v 1 [cs .AI] 20 Aug 2026  \nAn Agentic Approach for Active Data Collection, Travel Behavior Modeling, and Weather-Sensitive Demand  \nPrediction  \nNarges Ahmadia,* , Yubo Jiaoa , Jônatas Augusto Manzollia , Jiangbo Yua , Luis  \nMiranda-Morenoa  \na Department of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada  \nAbstract  \nTravel-behavior research increasingly combines digital data collection with predictive modeling, yet these stages are often developed and evaluated separately. This study proposes and applies a three-agent workflow integrating conversational data collection, structured data processing, and behavioral prediction. A chatbot-administered, image-augmented stated-preference survey collected mode choices from 92 student commuters across five predefined weather scenarios, yielding 454 respondent–scenario observations. Weather-related associations were analyzed using a multinomial logit model, while logistic regression and random forest provided machine-learning benchmarks. Nine locally deployed large language models (LLMs), ranging from 2 to 35 billion parameters, were evaluated across four zero-shot prompt-and-context conditions and further extended through persona, few-shot, and vision-based configurations. Cycling was particularly sensitive to adverse weather, while public transit use increased substantially under the Snowy scenario. Random forest achieved 69.6% five-class accuracy, while the best text-only zero-shot LLM reached 69.9% without task-specific fitting. Habitual travel information produced the most consistent improvement in LLM prediction, Expert framing generally outperformed Role-Play, and persona information was most beneficial when habitual travel information was unavailable. Few-shot prompting further improved five-class prediction for several models, with gains generally stabilizing after a small number of examples. Vision-capable models were also evaluated using the same weather images presented to respondents, and the best vision-based configuration reached the highest observed five-class accuracy of 71.5%, indicating that visual context can provide additional predictive information for selected models. Taken together, the findings show that habitual travel information, prompting strategy, demonstrations, and visual context can meaningfully shape LLM-based travel-choice prediction. More broadly, the study demonstrates how conversational survey administration, structured data processing, conventional behavioral modeling, machine learning, and multimodal LLM prediction can be coordinated within a single auditable multi-agent workflow, while broader application requires validation with larger and more representative traveler samples.  \nKeywords: Large language models, travel behavior, travel survey, conversational agents, mode choice, multi-agent system framework  \n*  \nCorresponding author.  \nEmail: [narges.ahmadi@mail.mcgill.ca](narges.ahmadi@mail.mcgill.ca)  \n1 Introduction  \nUnderstanding and predicting travel behavior is a fundamental component of transportation planning, encompassing interrelated decisions regarding when, where, and how individuals travel. Among these decisions, mode choice is particularly consequential because it determines how demand is distributed across transportation systems and influences infrastructure needs, environmental impacts, and the effectiveness of policies aimed at encouraging sustainable mobility (McFadden, 1974; Ben-Akiva and Lerman, 1985) . Mode choice is shaped not only by individual and alternative-specific characteristics but also by the context in which travel occurs. Weather is an important example, as precipitation, extreme temperatures, and adverse road conditions can alter the attractiveness of walking and cycling and shift travelers toward transit or private vehicles, with effects that vary across individuals and seasons (Hyland et al., 2018; Böcker et al., 2013; Saneinejad et al. , 2012) . Understanding such context","cbCaikKzjXhUNs8Q","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikKzjXhUNs8Q","pdf",2700303,25,"English","# Abstract\n# Introduction\n## Travel behavior and mode choice\n## Stated-preference survey limitations\n## Conversational AI and multimodal LLM opportunities","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the study address in travel-behavior research?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses the gap between digital data-collection methods and predictive modeling by integrating them into a single coordinated workflow rather than treating them as separate stages.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the travel data collected in the study?\",\"answer\":\"The study used a chatbot-administered, image-augmented stated-preference survey to collect mode choices from 92 student commuters across five weather scenarios.\"},{\"question\":\"Which modeling approaches and LLM setups were evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"Weather associations were modeled with multinomial logit, and benchmarks included logistic regression and random forest. Nine locally deployed LLMs were evaluated under zero-shot, persona, few-shot, and vision-based configurations using the same weather images.\"}]","An Agentic Approach for Active Data Collection, Travel Behavior Modeling, and Weather-Sensitive Demand Prediction - arXiv 2608.20320 - Abstract | PDF",63]