[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-570326-105":59,"doc-detail-570326-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","airwater-pollution-report-revised-construction-grant-regulations-give-states-more-flexibility-epa-says","AIR/WATER pollution report - REVISED CONSTRUCTION GRANT REGULATIONS - GIVE STATES MORE FLEXIBILITY, EPA SAYS","","Air/Water pollution report dated February 20, 1984 presents EPA’s revised construction grant regulations for wastewater treatment facilities. It explains how the final rule strengthens grantee accountability while expanding state flexibility, compared with earlier interim “capable of meeting” requirements. The update reduces federal regulatory burden, removes certain industrial-waste compatibility language, and limits federal funds for facilities used exclusively for industrial waste, while streamlining funding approvals and adjusting cost-share and sewer-related provisions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/airwater-pollution-report-revised-construction-grant-regulations-give-states-more-flexibility-epa-says/570326/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/airwater-pollution-report-revised-construction-grant-regulations-give-states-more-flexibility-epa-says/570326.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"WPS_1790064749","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-10-13",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What change do the revised construction grant regulations require for federally funded wastewater facilities?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Facilities must meet their design specifications and Clean Water Act enforceable requirements by the end of their first year of operation.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How do the revised regulations affect state flexibility?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"They strengthen accountability for grantees while reducing the burden of federal regulation and providing greater flexibility for local planners to achieve cost-effective wastewater treatment solutions.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the revised rule say about federally funded facilities treating industrial wastes?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It eliminates requirements to treat only industrial wastes compatible with domestic wastes, but continues to prohibit federal funds for facilities used exclusively for industrial waste.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},570326,1792122440,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747859154,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","○  \nAIR/WATER pollution report  \n       February 20,1984             Page 61  \nVol.22 No.7  \nSLANTS &TRENDS  \nWATER ON HOLD.The Senate's leadership has pushed back floor debate on the CleanWater Act by two weeks,to the end of March.  This is to buy time to cut a dealwith Sen.Malcolm Wallop(R.-Wyo.)who wants dredge-and-fill permitting provi-sions changed to exclude downstream water flow effects of a project.Alsoclouding the picture is RCRA,which has been wedged in ahead of CWA for whatmany feel will be a lengthy debate.Meanwhile,even the spring thaw is not ex-pected to move the House CMA bill faster.The subcommittee is still writing.  \n善 警 警  \nNONPOINT。To inerease its data base,EPA has offered $750,000 to ASIWPCA for astudy of nonpoint source pollution in the states.In a sales pitch last week,Jack Ravan told the group that the contract provides an opportunity to help dev-elop NSP programs that will most fit states'needs.Unconvinced that contract-ing to EPA is in their best interest and concerned that the study will provideEPA with a convenient excuse for inaction on NSP,the group postponed a decisionon the offer for at least several weeks.For more news on ASIWPCA,see p.63.  \n暑著善  \nWORLD REPORT CARD。We're failing in mathematics;resources continue to be drain-ed faster than we restore them,Worldwatch Institute claims in its first \"Stateof the World\"report.The planet is digging into its biological support sys-tems,and while some governments and leaders are \"vaguely aware\"of this,noviable plan has been developed to return the world to safe footing:0il con-sumption has fallen,but soil erosion,the other major loss,continues unabated.Evidence is also mounting that acid rain is becoming a \"severe threat to some ofthe world's most valued forests.\"Areas now witnessing the death of theirlakes may soon be confronted with dying forests.\"See story,p.62.  \n整 整 善  \nDOUBLE WHAMMY。Interior Department got hit twice by the report from its coalleasing commission.The last draft was leaked(A/MPR,Jan.16,1984,p.11),andlast week William Clark was socked with the final report,which set off anotherround of eriticism。James Matt's policy of full speed ahead was a costly ven-ture,both in terms of federal financial losses and of environmental risk,thereport says.At the same time,DOI budget and personnel cutting crippled thedepartment's ability to manage the job。That the leasing policy threatened toundercut land use and environmental planning should not surprise conservation-ists,who have been suspicious from the first that the administration's dedica-tion to the environment only scratched the surface.But the poliey also exacer-bated federal/state relations,the group found.This goes very much against theReagan grain.  Look for some cosmetie changes,with environmental lip service.    \nAIR/WATER pollution report February 20,1984  \n## REVISED CONSTRUCTION GRANT REGULATIONSGIVE STATES MORE FLEXIBILITY,EPA SAYS\n\nFacilities receiving federal construction grants must meet their design spe-cifications and the enforceable requirements of the Clean Water Act by the endof their first year of operation,according to revised construction grant regu-lations promulgated Friday by the Environmental Protection Agency.  \nInterim regulations issued May 12,1982,only required grantees to demon-strate that the funded facility was \"capable of meeting\"performance standards(A/WPR,May 10,1982,p.187)。The final rule,by strengthening the accountab-1lity of grantees,more closely reflects the intent of the 1981 constructiongrant amendments to the Clean Water Act,EPA explained.  \nDespite this instance of \"tightening up\"language,EPA said the revised con-struction grant regulations will provide more flexibility to the states for theconstruction of wastewater treatment facilities.  EPA Administrator WilliamRuckelshaus explained that the revised regulation will reduce the burden of fed-eral regulation while providing local planners with\"greater flexibility in ach-ieving the most cost-effective wa","cbCairJZ6O0YcI1H","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairJZ6O0YcI1H","pdf",3770979,11,"English","# REVISED CONSTRUCTION GRANT REGULATIONS\n## GIVE STATES MORE FLEXIBILITY, EPA SAYS\n# MISMANAGEMENT!OF SOIL THREATENS\n## WORLD ECONOMY, WORLDWATCH CLAIMS","[{\"question\":\"What change do the revised construction grant regulations require for federally funded wastewater facilities?\",\"answer\":\"Facilities must meet their design specifications and Clean Water Act enforceable requirements by the end of their first year of operation.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the revised regulations affect state flexibility?\",\"answer\":\"They strengthen accountability for grantees while reducing the burden of federal regulation and providing greater flexibility for local planners to achieve cost-effective wastewater treatment solutions.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the revised rule say about federally funded facilities treating industrial wastes?\",\"answer\":\"It eliminates requirements to treat only industrial wastes compatible with domestic wastes, but continues to prohibit federal funds for facilities used exclusively for industrial waste.\"}]","AIR/WATER pollution report - REVISED CONSTRUCTION GRANT REGULATIONS - GIVE STATES MORE FLEXIBILITY, EPA SAYS | PDF",1791880476,28]