[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-568481-105":59,"doc-detail-568481-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","airwater-pollution-report-no31-weekly-report-on-environmental-protection","AIR/WATER pollution report - No.31 - Weekly Report on Environmental Protection","","Weekly Report on Environmental Protection analyzes federal air and water pollution control compliance costs, projecting about $526 billion spent over ten years. The report attributes major expenditures to equipment, installation, operating and maintenance, and estimates sector-specific air-control spending for fuels and energy industries. For water pollution controls, it details federal outlays for municipal wastewater treatment plants and discusses economic macroeffects, including higher consumer prices, lower real GNP, employment gains, and transitional unemployment from closing noncompliant plants. It also critiques the cost assumptions and highlights missing benefits of environmental programs, alongside EPA cautions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/airwater-pollution-report-no31-weekly-report-on-environmental-protection/568481/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/airwater-pollution-report-no31-weekly-report-on-environmental-protection/568481.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Patrick","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-10-13",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How much will be spent over the next ten years to meet federal air and water standards?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"About $526 billion will be spent over a ten-year period to meet federal air and water pollution control standards.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which sectors are expected to face the highest air-pollution compliance costs?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"EPA anticipates the highest air-control costs will be incurred by fuels and energy industries, including electric power plants, petroleum refineries, and coal mining facilities.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why does the report say costs may be overstated?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The authors state that assumptions in the report likely overstate costs because no allowances are made for technological innovation that could reduce pollution-control costs, and EPA also notes the report does not account for program benefits.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},568481,1792162226,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},549758146520,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80002397d8c0411e94?_k=1775819394049821470","Vol.22 No.31  \nAIR/WATER pollution report  \n# Weekly Report on Environmental Protection\n\n        August 6,1984              Page 301  \nAir/Water Compliance To Cost $526 Billion Over 10 Years……Page 302  \nReaction Mixed on EPA Plan To Cut Lead in Gasoline…………Page 303  \nWays and Means Adopts $10.2 Billion Superfund Plan………Page 304  \nARCO Promotes Use of Methanol Blends To Replace Lead    …Page 304  \nAlm Pledges To Improve EPA's Risk Assessment Techniques……Page 305  \nAcid Rain Debate Moves South as Sunbelt Examines Issue……Page 306  \nNRDC Likely To File Suit Against EPA on POM Emissions……Page 306  \nSLANTS &TRENDS  \nIN A MOVE SURE TO ELICIT sighs of relief from many Republicans,former EPAAdminstrator Anne Burford finally decided --just one day before she was to besworn in --not to accept President Reagan's nomination as head of the NationalAdvisory Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere.Thanking Reagan for his personalsupport and confidence,Burford explained that she was withdrawing from the postin an effort to \"avoid any further disruption of thoughtful discussion\"ofenvironmental issues.  \nJUMPING IN AND OUT of the fire,Burford did little to endear herself to fellowRepublicans several weeks ago when she used the terms \"joke\"and \"nothing-burger\"to describe NACOA。In an uncharacteristic break with Reagan,theRepublican-controlled Senate asked the president,by a vote of 74 to 19,towithdraw his nomination of Burford.The House quickly followed suit with itsown resolution,approved by a vote of 363 to 51.  \n鲁 册 鲁  \nATTEMPTING TO GET the environmental discussion away from personalities and backto policy,the Reagan administration may be backing off somewhat on its opposi-tion to the costs of the House CWA.The issue of costs may prove to be a mootpoint,however,if New Jersey and New York members cannot agree on a compromiseto provisions limiting New York City's discharge of raw sewage into the HudsonRiver.Although staffers for Sens.Alfonse D'Amato(R。-N.Y.)and Frank Lauten-berg(D.-N.J.)acknowledge that negotiations are underway,neither office willdisclose details on the compromise provisions being considered.A D'Amato staffersaid both sides have a strong interest in seeing a water bill signed into law.  \n鲁 暑  \nSENATE TOXIC SUBSTANCES subcommittee is still hoping to mark up Safe DrinkingWater Act amendments this week,although no date for markup has been set yet.Whether or not the full Senate Environment Committee marks up a SDWA bill inSeptember will depend largely on House action on a comparable SDWA bill.Housestaffers say a markup is possible。  \nAIR/WATER pollution report.  \n## AIR/WATER COMPLIANCE TO COST$526 BILLION OVER 10 YEARS\n\nAbout $526 billion will be spent over a 10-year period to meet federal airand water pollution control standards,says a study released today by the En-vironmental Protection Agency.From 1981 to 1990,EPA estimates that industryand the government will have to spend about $270 billion to meet water pollutionregulations and about $256 billion to meet air pollution controls.  \nThe cost study,required under the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts,is basedsolely on compliance with federal regulations and does not include compliancecosts for state and local regulations.Included in the costs are the capitalcosts of equipment and installation,annual capital costs(sum of equivalentannual cost or current and previous years!capital expenditures)and directoperating and maintenance costs.  \nEPA anticipates that the highest costs for complying with air pollution con-trol standards will be incurred by the fuels and energy industries.Electricpower plants,petroleum refineries and coal mining facilities are expected tospend about $98.3 billion for air controls.EPA estimates that mobile sources,including vehicles and aircraft,will,spend about $80.6 billion.This numberreflects projected growth in the automobile population plus the costs for leadphase-down and lead-free gasoline production.  \nof the $270 billion expected to be spent on water pollut","cbCaiu3BLY4PJ4Ty","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiu3BLY4PJ4Ty","pdf",3580563,11,"English","# Weekly Report on Environmental Protection\n## AIR/WATER COMPLIANCE TO COST $526 BILLION OVER 10 YEARS\n## Report Overstates Costs","[{\"question\":\"How much will be spent over the next ten years to meet federal air and water standards?\",\"answer\":\"About $526 billion will be spent over a ten-year period to meet federal air and water pollution control standards.\"},{\"question\":\"Which sectors are expected to face the highest air-pollution compliance costs?\",\"answer\":\"EPA anticipates the highest air-control costs will be incurred by fuels and energy industries, including electric power plants, petroleum refineries, and coal mining facilities.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the report say costs may be overstated?\",\"answer\":\"The authors state that assumptions in the report likely overstate costs because no allowances are made for technological innovation that could reduce pollution-control costs, and EPA also notes the report does not account for program benefits.\"}]","AIR/WATER pollution report - No.31 - Weekly Report on Environmental Protection | PDF",1791871099,28]