[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-292914-105":59,"doc-detail-292914-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","aids-2026-abstract-book-abstract-submission-review-process","AIDS 2026 Abstract Book - Abstract Submission - Review Process","","AIDS 2026, the 26th International AIDS Conference, received more than 7,430 abstract submissions. Abstracts were evaluated through a blind peer-review process completed by over 870 international experts, with each submission reviewed by three to four reviewers assessing quality and originality. Reviewers followed strict conflict-of-interest and expertise requirements. Scoring used five pre-determined criteria, equally weighted, with late-breaker abstracts receiving additional assessment. Track committees conducted additional review when fewer reviews or scoring discrepancies occurred.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/aids-2026-abstract-book-abstract-submission-review-process/292914/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/aids-2026-abstract-book-abstract-submission-review-process/292914.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Finn","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-12","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",28,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How many abstracts were submitted to AIDS 2026 and what was the acceptance rate?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"Over 7,430 abstracts were submitted, and the overall acceptance rate was 39% (including late breaker abstracts).","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How was the peer-review process conducted for the abstracts?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"All abstracts went through a blind peer-review process completed by over 870 reviewers. Each abstract was reviewed by three to four reviewers assessing quality and originality.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What scoring method and criteria were used to evaluate abstracts?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Each abstract was scored numerically against five pre-determined criteria with equal weighting to produce a final score ranging from one (lowest) to six (highest). Additional review by track committees occurred for fewer than two reviews or scoring discrepancies.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},292914,1789657567,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},34359740700684,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1f400023980c374ae676?_k=1777273430885731487","AIDS 2026  \nabstract book  \n[aids2026.org](aids2026.org) AIDS 2026, the 26th International AIDS Conference  \nAIDS 2026 Organizing Committee  \nIAS President and International Co-Chair  \nBeatriz Grinsztejn, Brazil  \nLocal Co-Chair  \nDraurio Barreira, Brazil  \nMembers  \nKenneth Ngure, Kenya  \nBirgit Poniatowski, Switzerland Darrell Tan, Canada  \nErika Castellanos, the Netherlands Joseph Robert Linda, Uganda Brent Allan, Australia  \nChristian Gaebler, Germany Fernando Valiente-Echeverria, Chile  \nRegional Co-Chair  \nClaudia Cortes, Chile  \nAnton Pozniak, United Kingdom Sandra Wagner Cardoso, Brazil Jean-Michel Molina, France Renee Heffron, United States Benjamin Bavinton, Australia Thiago Torres, Brazil  \nRenata Arrington Sanders, United States  \nSaiqa Mullick, South Africa Jirair Ratevosian, United States Solange Baptiste, South Africa Thiago Jerohan Albuquerque da  \nCruz, Brazil  \nPaulo Dos Santos, Argentina Muleya Mwananyanda, Germany Trey Watkins, United States  \nTrack Committees  \nTrack A: Basic and translational science  \nCo-leads:  \nChristian Gaebler, Germany  \nFernando Valiente-Echeverria, Chile  \nMembers:  \nAndrés Finzi, Canada Andrew Redd, United States Jillian Lau, Australia Natalia Laufer, Argentina Zaza Ndhlovu, South Africa  \nTrack B: Clinical Science  \nCo-leads:  \nAnton Pozniak, United Kingdom Sandra Wagner Cardoso, Brazil  \nMembers:  \nAllison Agwu, United States Anchalee Avihingsanon, Thailand Esteban Martinez, Spain  \nMonica Jacques de Moraes, Brazil Sim iso Sokhela, South Africa  \nTrack C: Epidemiology and prevention science  \nCo-leads:  \nJean-Michel Molina, France Renee Heffron, United States  \nMembers:  \nGeoff Garnett, United States Ishwar Gilada, India  \nJennifer Sherwood, United States Thesla Palanee-Phillips, South Africa Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Brazil  \nTrack D: Social and behavioural sciences  \nCo-leads:  \nBenjamin Bavinton, Australia Thiago Torres, Brazil  \nMembers:  \nCarol Strong, Taiwan Charlie Witzel, Thailand Erin Wilson, United States Kelika Konda, Peru  \nYvonne Wangũi Machira, Kenya  \nTrack E: Implementation science, economics, systems and synergies  \nCo-leads:  \nRenata Arrington Sanders, United States Saiqa Mullick, South Africa  \nMembers:  \nDanvic Rosadiño, Philippines Elizabeth Irungu, Kenya Errol L Fields, United States  \nMónica Thormann, Dominican Republic Sahar Bajis, United Arab Emirates  \nTrack F: Political science, laws, ethics, policies and human rights  \nCo-leads:  \nJirair Ratevosian, United States Solange Baptiste, South Africa  \nMembers:  \nDanielle M Campbell, United States Edwin J Bernard, The Netherlands James Gray, Australia  \nOthoman Mellouk, Morocco Veriano Terto, Brazil  \n[aids2026.org](aids2026.org) Abstract book 2  \nAbstract submission  \nOver 7,430 abstracts were submitted to AIDS 2026, the 26th International AIDS Conference. The Organizing Committee (OC) is very grateful for all the abstract submissions received. While the OC found many very high-quality abstracts among the submissions, due to limitations in the conference programme, more abstracts were rejected than accepted – with an overall acceptance rate of 39%(which includes the late breaker abstracts) .  \nAll abstracts went through a blind peer-review process completed by over 870 abstract reviewers. These reviewers are international experts in the field of HIV, including members of the OC and track committees. Each abstract was reviewed by three to four reviewers. The abstracts  \nwere reviewed for the quality and originality of the work. Late-breaking abstract reviews included an additional assessment of the late-breaking nature of the research.  \nAll reviewers were instructed to abstain from scoring any abstract on which they were an author or co-author, hada financial or personal conflict of interest, or did not have the appropriate expertise to evaluate. Each abstract was scored numerically against five pre-determined criteria, which were equally weighted to get a final score. The final score ranged from one (the ","cbCaigcoDvQJikGH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigcoDvQJikGH","pdf",31595191,1655,"English","# Abstract submission\n## Review process and selection criteria\n## Abstract statistics","[{\"question\":\"How many abstracts were submitted to AIDS 2026 and what was the acceptance rate?\",\"answer\":\"Over 7,430 abstracts were submitted, and the overall acceptance rate was 39% (including late breaker abstracts).\"},{\"question\":\"How was the peer-review process conducted for the abstracts?\",\"answer\":\"All abstracts went through a blind peer-review process completed by over 870 reviewers. Each abstract was reviewed by three to four reviewers assessing quality and originality.\"},{\"question\":\"What scoring method and criteria were used to evaluate abstracts?\",\"answer\":\"Each abstract was scored numerically against five pre-determined criteria with equal weighting to produce a final score ranging from one (lowest) to six (highest). Additional review by track committees occurred for fewer than two reviews or scoring discrepancies.\"}]","AIDS 2026 Abstract Book - Abstract Submission - Review Process | PDF",4171]