[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-427726-105":59,"doc-detail-427726-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","age-and-gender-disparities-in-processed-meat-consumption-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-poster-study-findings","AGE AND GENDER DISPARITIES IN PROCESSED MEAT CONSUMPTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC - Poster - Study findings","","The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped dietary behaviors, with processed meat consumption carrying important health implications. This cross-sectional study applied the Dietary Screening Tool (DST) to assess age- and gender-related differences among 10,050 U.S. adults aged 40–100. Binary logistic regression compared three age groups (40–60, 61–80, 81–100). Women were 23.6% less likely than men to report decreased consumption. Adults aged 40–60 were 47% more likely to reduce intake versus 61–80, and over twice versus 81–100. Public health messaging and tailored dietary interventions should target these demographic gaps, especially during crises.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/age-and-gender-disparities-in-processed-meat-consumption-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-poster-study-findings/427726/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/age-and-gender-disparities-in-processed-meat-consumption-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-poster-study-findings/427726.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Damian","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-05","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How many participants were included, and what age range was studied?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The study analyzed 10,050 U.S. adults aged 40–100 years.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What tool and method were used to evaluate changes in processed meat consumption?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Processed meat consumption was assessed using the Dietary Screening Tool (DST), and differences across age and gender were tested with binary logistic regression.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What were the main findings regarding gender and age disparities?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Women were 23.6% less likely than men to report decreased processed meat consumption. Adults aged 40–60 were 47% more likely to reduce intake than those aged 61–80, and more than twice as likely compared with those aged 81–100, while the 61–80 vs 81–100 difference was not statistically significant.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},427726,1791082767,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":81},137451208677,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","SESSION 7050 (POSTER)  COVID-19 PANDEMIC  \nAbstract citation ID: igaf122.2305  \nAGE AND GENDER DISPARITIES IN PROCESSED MEAT CONSUMPTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC  \nLillie Monroe-Lord, Azam Ardekani, Phronie Jackson, and Weitman Cassidy, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, United States  \nThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered dietary habits, including processed meat consumption, which holds critical health implications. This cross-sectional study utilized the Dietary Screening Tool (DST) to analyze age- and gender-related differences in processed meat consumption among 10,050 U.S. adults aged 40–100 years. Three age groups (40–60, 61–80, and 81–100 years) were compared using binary logistic regression to assess the odds of decreased processed meat consumption by age and gender. Results revealed significant disparities: women were 23.6% less likely than men to report reduced processed meat consumption. Participants aged 40–60 years were 47% more likely to reduce processed meat consumption compared to those aged 61–80 years and over twice as likely compared to those aged 81–100 years. The difference between the 61–80 and 81–100 age groups was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that younger adults, particularly those aged 40–60 years, were more likely to decrease processed meat consumption, possibly due to heightened health awareness during the pandemic. In contrast, women exhibited a lower likelihood of reduced processed meat consumption, underscoring potential gender-specific challenges in dietary habits. This study highlights the need for tailored dietary interventions addressing processed meat consumption. Public health strategies should focus on promoting healthier dietary patterns through targeted messaging for diverse demographic groups, particularly during public health crises.","cbCaidaeNXIpFz6o","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidaeNXIpFz6o","pdf",53656,"English","# Study Design\n## Population and Measurement\n## Statistical Approach\n# Key Results\n## Gender Differences\n## Age Differences\n# Public Health Implications\n## Tailored Dietary Interventions","[{\"question\":\"How many participants were included, and what age range was studied?\",\"answer\":\"The study analyzed 10,050 U.S. adults aged 40–100 years.\"},{\"question\":\"What tool and method were used to evaluate changes in processed meat consumption?\",\"answer\":\"Processed meat consumption was assessed using the Dietary Screening Tool (DST), and differences across age and gender were tested with binary logistic regression.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the main findings regarding gender and age disparities?\",\"answer\":\"Women were 23.6% less likely than men to report decreased processed meat consumption. Adults aged 40–60 were 47% more likely to reduce intake than those aged 61–80, and more than twice as likely compared with those aged 81–100, while the 61–80 vs 81–100 difference was not statistically significant.\"}]","AGE AND GENDER DISPARITIES IN PROCESSED MEAT CONSUMPTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC - Poster - Study findings | PDF",1790644691]