[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33564-en":3,"doc-seo-33564-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33564,1099514068035,"Ezra","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",2,"Literature","Against Method Verso 1993","The book Against Method presents a historical and argumentative account of Paul Feyerabend’s ideas on how scientific knowledge grows. Its structure is shaped by a collaborative correspondence with Imre Lakatos, including revisions after Lakatos’s death, and by Feyerabend’s engagement with extensive criticism. The text emphasizes pluralism in cultures and procedures, arguing that science should stand without ideological guardianship while societies should also remain protected from science, through public control and institutional separation.","","cbCaint1oP4D4Zsu","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaint1oP4D4Zsu","pdf",4103776,1,290,"English","en",105,"# Preface\n## Preface to the Third Edition\n# Introduction\n## Parts 1–20\n# Postscript on Relativism\n# Index","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose and structure of Against Method as described by Feyerabend?\",\"answer\":\"It is not a systematic treatise but a letter-like work addressing the peculiarities of Imre Lakatos, shaped by correspondence and later revisions.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the book relate to Imre Lakatos and Popper?\",\"answer\":\"Lakatos’s rationalism plays a large role, and Popper is discussed more often than its “objective importance” would warrant, reflecting Lakatos’s influence and admiration.\"},{\"question\":\"What institutional stance does Feyerabend advocate for science in democracies?\",\"answer\":\"Scientific institutions and research programs should face public control, with separation of state and science, and science taught as one view among many rather than the sole path to truth.\"}]",1782212751,447,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":27},"against-method-verso-1993",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/against-method-verso-1993/33564/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What is the purpose and structure of Against Method as described by Feyerabend?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"It is not a systematic treatise but a letter-like work addressing the peculiarities of Imre Lakatos, shaped by correspondence and later revisions.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"How does the book relate to Imre Lakatos and Popper?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"Lakatos’s rationalism plays a large role, and Popper is discussed more often than its “objective importance” would warrant, reflecting Lakatos’s influence and admiration.",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"What institutional stance does Feyerabend advocate for science in democracies?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"Scientific institutions and research programs should face public control, with separation of state and science, and science taught as one view among many rather than the sole path to truth.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]