[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-297040-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-297040-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","admissions-to-higher-education-fair-admissions-to-higher-education-recommendations-for-good-practice","Admissions to Higher Education - Fair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice","","Independent review report on fair admissions to higher education in England, commissioned to assess options higher education institutions should consider when judging applicants’ merit. The document defines what a fair and transparent admissions system should achieve, examines evidence and consultation feedback, and addresses questions such as use of background factors, transparency of criteria, and reliability of different assessment methods. It sets out principles and sector-wide recommendations, including implementation guidance, monitoring of progress, and practical implications for coordinated action across education.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/","Exam",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/admissions-to-higher-education-fair-admissions-to-higher-education-recommendations-for-good-practice/297040/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/admissions-to-higher-education-fair-admissions-to-higher-education-recommendations-for-good-practice/297040.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Emma Mercer","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the Admissions to Higher Education review?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It leads an independent review of options English higher education institutions should consider when assessing applicants’ merit, and it reports the high-level principles for doing so.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Why does the report emphasize fairness and transparency in admissions?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"A fair and transparent admissions system is essential for applicants to have confidence in the integrity of the process, especially as access to higher education affects many people’s life chances.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What issues does the review investigate regarding assessing applicants’ merit?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It examines how to define merit, how background factors should be considered, what admissions transparency means, how reliable and valid different assessment methods are, and whether predicted examination results can support fairness.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},297040,1789739786,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":33,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":86,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":143},962084925502,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","[www.admissions-review.org.uk](www.admissions-review.org.uk)  \nFair admissions to higher education: recommendations for good practice  \nAdmissions to Higher Education Steering Group  \nAdmissions to Higher Education  \nFair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice  \nContents  \nForeword 2  \nExecutive summary 4  \nSection A: Background 13  \nSection B: What are the issues? 21  \nSection C: A fair admissions system 30  \nSection D: Principles underpinning fair admissions and guidelines 32  \nfor implementation  \nSection E: Recommendations requiring co-ordination across the 44  \neducation system  \nSection F: Options for assessing merit 54  \nSection G: Reviewing progress towards fair admissions 57  \nSection H: Pratical implications of the recommendations 58  \nReferences 59  \nAppendix 1: Terms of reference and membership of the Steering Group 63  \nAppendix 2: List of consultation events 65  \nAppendix 3: Overview of responses to consultations 66  \nAppendix 4: Schooling effects 69  \nAppendix 5: Legal issues 71  \nAppendix 6: Model institutional admissions policy 75  \nAppendix 7: Example feedback letter 78  \nAppendix 8: Glossary 79  \nAppendix 9: Summary table of problems, principles and recommendations 86  \nAdmissions to Higher Education  \nFair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice  \nForeword by  \nProfessor Steven Schwartz  \nI was asked by Charles Clarke, Secretary of State for Education and Skills, to lead an independent review of the options that English higher education institutions should consider when assessing the merit of applicants for their courses, and to report on the high-level principles underlying these options. I was supported in this review by a Steering Group representing a range of stakeholders. Our review began in June 2003, and this is our final report.  \nAdmissions are the responsibility of universities and colleges themselves, and rightly so. Institutions should be able to set their own criteria, choose their own assessment methods, and select their own students. But it is important that everyone has confidence in the integrity of the admissions process. Access to higher education matters to many people, and so do fair admissions.  \nOur inquiry has looked at the available evidence relating to admissions. We published two consultation papers and received a large number of responses. I have personally debated and discussed with a wide range of people and organisations some of the most controversial issues facing our review. How do we define merit and what is a fair admissions system? To what extent should background factors be considered when selecting students? What exactly does transparency of admissions criteria and processes mean? Are some assessment methods more reliable and valid than others? Can a system in which large numbers of applicants are offered places based on predicted examination results be fair?  \nThe Steering Group presents in this report a set of five principles which it believes are the basis of fair admissions. We recognise that there may be challenges for some institutions in implementing the principles; but we also believe that it is in the interests of all universities and colleges, as well as applicants, that they are adopted. We make a series of wider recommendations aimed at the education sector as a whole, and we look to those identified in the report to progress these recommendations swiftly.  \nIt is our intention that this report acts both as a catalyst for action, and as a practical guide to fair admissions to which institutions can refer in reviewing and developing their admissions policies and processes.  \nAdmissions to Higher Education  \nFair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice  \nIn publishing this report, I would like to place on record my thanks to the members of the Steering Group, who contributed generously of their time and ideas, and brought a range of opinion and experience to bear on this complex top","cbCainYi9LuCsgv3","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainYi9LuCsgv3","pdf",268359,"English","# Contents\n## Foreword\n## Executive summary\n## Section A: Background\n## Section B: What are the issues?\n## Section C: A fair admissions system\n## Section D: Principles underpinning fair admissions and guidelines for implementation\n## Section E: Recommendations requiring co-ordination across the education system\n## Section F: Options for assessing merit\n## Section G: Reviewing progress towards fair admissions\n## Section H: Pratical implications of the recommendations\n## References\n## Appendix 1: Terms of reference and membership of the Steering Group\n## Appendix 2: List of consultation events\n## Appendix 3: Overview of responses to consultations\n## Appendix 4: Schooling effects\n## Appendix 5: Legal issues\n## Appendix 6: Model institutional admissions policy\n## Appendix 7: Example feedback letter\n## Appendix 8: Glossary\n## Appendix 9: Summary table of problems, principles and recommendations","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Admissions to Higher Education review?\",\"answer\":\"It leads an independent review of options English higher education institutions should consider when assessing applicants’ merit, and it reports the high-level principles for doing so.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the report emphasize fairness and transparency in admissions?\",\"answer\":\"A fair and transparent admissions system is essential for applicants to have confidence in the integrity of the process, especially as access to higher education affects many people’s life chances.\"},{\"question\":\"What issues does the review investigate regarding assessing applicants’ merit?\",\"answer\":\"It examines how to define merit, how background factors should be considered, what admissions transparency means, how reliable and valid different assessment methods are, and whether predicted examination results can support fairness.\"}]","Admissions to Higher Education - Fair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice | PDF",227]