[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-537874-en":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":30,"doc-seo-537874-105":80},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":11,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29,"preview_page_count":4},537874,962090893581,"OmBimo","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",4,"Exam","Administrator’s Academy Course Proposal Rubric - Coordinator Rubric","Administrator’s Academy Course Proposal Rubric is a structured evaluation tool used to judge course proposals for approval readiness. It assesses how the course title, description, continuing professional development (CPD) hours, and participant outcomes align to content accuracy and standards. The rubric also evaluates listed course materials, research references, course syllabus alignment and timing, and the application/dissemination component’s requirement for participants to produce and connect a written product to intended outcomes.","Illinois State Board of Education  \n100 North First Street • Springfield, Illinois 62777-0001 [www.isbe.net](www.isbe.net)  \nJames T. Meeks Tony Smith, Ph.D.  \nChairman State Superintendent of Education  \nAdministrator’s Academy Course Proposal Rubric  \n\n|  | Not Approved | Modifications Necessitated | Approved |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Course\u003Cbr>Title | The Course Title does not reflect the content of the course. | The Course Title is ambiguous. The content of the course is unclear. | The Course Title is descriptive, clearly indicating the content or topic, including keywords. |\n| Course Description | The Course Description does not indicate the course topic, nor reflect\u003Cbr>course outcomes. | The Course Description attempts to develop the course topic with limited and/or unclear details, and vaguely reflects the outcomes ofthe course. Pre-assignments and/or required course materials are not indicated. | The Course Description clearly indicates the course topic and content. It reflects the outcomes ofthe course and is aligned to the Course Syllabus. Any pre-session assignments and/or materials that participants must bring to the session (such as School Improvement Plan) are clearly listed. |\n| CPD Hours | The course does not meet the 6 hour total minimum time requirement of which at least 3 hours are indirect contact with the presenter. | The course meets the minimum time requirement; however, insufficient time is allotted for the Application/Dissemination component. | The course meets the minimum time requirement. Appropriate time is included for pre-session activities, indirect contact activities such as research, reading, preparing documents, and completing the Application/Dissemination component. |\n| Participant Outcomes | All outcomes are worded incorrectly (as actions), are knowledge-based (lack depth), and/or do not align to standards. | The majority of outcomes are written incorrectly. They are vague; it is unclear as to what participants will know or be able to do; and they only ask participants to recall, remember, identify, recognize, or reproduce the intended outcomes. The alignment to standards is unclear. | Each outcome indicates what the participant will know or be able to do as a result of the instruction. Outcomes are not worded as“actions” and are indicative of higher order thinking (application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, etc. are embedded in the course) . School leader standards (or Learning Forward standards) and performance/knowledge indicators are aligned directly to each outcome. |\n| Course Materials | No substantive materials are listed. It appears that only one perspective often by one author is provided. Materials are not current (older than 5 years) . | Not all materials are listed, although they are referenced in other areas of the proposal. A primary material is listed, but is not current (5 years or less) . | All materials included in the course are listed, including Power Points, audio/video materials, worksheets, templates and handouts. AA courses are expected to have a greater depth of knowledge than other workshops; therefore, required materials include a primary resource such as a book. All required information is provided.\u003Cbr>Numerous individuals/authors are identified. At least 2 of the materials are within the last 5 years. |\n\n\n|  | Not Approved | Modifications\u003Cbr>Necessitated | Approved |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Research\u003Cbr>References | No research references are listed, or there are no substantive materials. Research papers alone are not sufficient. | Research references are limited and are not reputable. It is not clear how the proposal is research-based, or has vague, imprecise research from unreliable sources | At least 2 valid evidence based research references were used to create the course. Multiple authors/researchers, peer reviewed materials, and notable experts in the field are identified. Sufficient references for those who wish to pursue further research into th","cbCaifTTHCaaxwWj","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifTTHCaaxwWj","pdf",415085,1,3,"English","en",105,"# Course Proposal Rubric Criteria\n## Course Title and Description\n## CPD Hours and Participant Outcomes\n## Course Materials and Research References\n## Course Syllabus\n## Application/Dissemination Component","[{\"question\":\"What makes a course title and description “Approved” under this rubric?\",\"answer\":\"An approved course title is descriptive and clearly indicates the content or topic with relevant keywords. The course description must clearly indicate the course topic and content, reflect outcomes, align to the syllabus, and list pre-session assignments or required materials.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the rubric evaluate CPD hours?\",\"answer\":\"It checks whether the course meets the 6-hour minimum, including at least 3 hours of indirect contact. “Approved” proposals include appropriate time for pre-session activities, indirect contact activities, and the application/dissemination component.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the rubric require for the application/dissemination component?\",\"answer\":\"The application/dissemination component must require participants to produce a product. For “Approved,” the product should be a written outcome reflecting application of the course outcomes, aligned with those outcomes and described with clarity.\"}]","Administrator’s Academy Course Proposal Rubric - Coordinator Rubric | PDF",1791605709,8,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":31},[32,37,42,45,50,55,60,64,69,72,76],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":34,"show_sort_weight":35,"slug":36},"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":38,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":39,"show_sort_weight":40,"slug":41},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":43,"slug":44},70,"exam",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":47,"show_sort_weight":48,"slug":49},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":51,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":52,"show_sort_weight":53,"slug":54},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":58,"slug":59},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":61,"show_sort_weight":62,"slug":63},"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":65,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":66,"show_sort_weight":67,"slug":68},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":67,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":70,"show_sort_weight":67,"slug":71},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":73,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":74,"show_sort_weight":73,"slug":75},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":77,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":33,"category_name":78,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":79},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":83,"title":13,"keywords":84,"description":14,"schema_data":85,"social_meta":138,"head_meta":140,"extra_data":142,"updated_unix":143},"administrators-academy-course-proposal-rubric-coordinator-rubric","",{"@graph":86,"@context":137},[87,100,120],{"@type":88,"itemListElement":89},"BreadcrumbList",[90,94,96,98],{"item":91,"name":92,"@type":93,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":95,"name":33,"@type":93,"position":38},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":97,"name":12,"@type":93,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",{"item":99,"name":13,"@type":93,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/administrators-academy-course-proposal-rubric-coordinator-rubric/537874/",{"url":99,"name":13,"@type":101,"image":102,"author":107,"headline":13,"publisher":109,"fileFormat":112,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":113,"datePublished":114,"encodingFormat":112,"isAccessibleForFree":115,"interactionStatistic":116},"DigitalDocument",{"url":103,"@type":104,"width":105,"height":106},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/administrators-academy-course-proposal-rubric-coordinator-rubric/537874.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":9,"@type":108},"Person",{"url":91,"name":110,"@type":111},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-11","2026-10-10",true,{"@type":117,"interactionType":118,"userInteractionCount":11},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":119},"ViewAction",{"@type":121,"mainEntity":122},"FAQPage",[123,129,133],{"name":124,"@type":125,"acceptedAnswer":126},"What makes a course title and description “Approved” under this rubric?","Question",{"text":127,"@type":128},"An approved course title is descriptive and clearly indicates the content or topic with relevant keywords. The course description must clearly indicate the course topic and content, reflect outcomes, align to the syllabus, and list pre-session assignments or required materials.","Answer",{"name":130,"@type":125,"acceptedAnswer":131},"How does the rubric evaluate CPD hours?",{"text":132,"@type":128},"It checks whether the course meets the 6-hour minimum, including at least 3 hours of indirect contact. “Approved” proposals include appropriate time for pre-session activities, indirect contact activities, and the application/dissemination component.",{"name":134,"@type":125,"acceptedAnswer":135},"What does the rubric require for the application/dissemination component?",{"text":136,"@type":128},"The application/dissemination component must require participants to produce a product. For “Approved,” the product should be a written outcome reflecting application of the course outcomes, aligned with those outcomes and described with clarity.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":99,"og:type":139,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":110,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":141,"canonical":99},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},1792160296]