[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-332817-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":85,"doc-detail-332817-en":135},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":78,"head_meta":80,"extra_data":82,"updated_unix":84},105,"en","acsnano-review-process-compiled-minor-revisions-required","ACSNano review process compiled - Minor revisions required","","Peer-review exchange for an ACS Nano manuscript focusing on super-resolution imaging of single-emitter coupling to localized plasmon resonance (LSPR) and lattice resonances (SLR). Reviewer feedback requests additional results for non-optimal emitter placements (LSPR in S2 and SPR in S1), with corresponding Purcell factor and related metrics. Author reply reports control experiments and simulations added to Supporting Information (Sections 6 and 7), showing distinct or similar enhanced-emission patterns depending on filter wavelength and sample position, and clarifies interpretation of directivity enhancement using objective numerical aperture.",{"@graph":14,"@context":77},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/acsnano-review-process-compiled-minor-revisions-required/332817/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/acsnano-review-process-compiled-minor-revisions-required/332817.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Sage","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69,73],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What major revision did the reviewer request regarding resonance coupling results?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The reviewer asked for results for the non-optimal emitter-location combinations: LSPR in S2 and SPR in S1, not only the optimal LSPR-in-S1 and SPR-in-S2 cases.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Where were the requested experiments and simulations added in the author response?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The author states that the requested experiments and corresponding simulations were added to Sections 6 and 7 of the Supporting Information.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How did the emission enhancement patterns change between sample S1 and sample S2 under wavelength filtering?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"For sample S1, filtering at 575±20 nm (SLR) gives patterns very similar to filtering at 650±20 nm (LSPR). For sample S2, filtering at 650±20 nm (LSPR) produces a different pattern than filtering at 575±20 nm (SLR).",{"name":74,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":75},"How is the directivity enhancement D related to the objective numerical aperture (NA)?",{"text":76,"@type":64},"The author reply clarifies that NA=1.4 used in the simulation is also used in the calculation of directivity, and that the value was included in the manuscript text.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":79,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":81,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":83,"site_id":7},332817,1790251302,{"code":4,"msg":86,"data":87},"success",[88,92,96,100,105,110,115,119,124,127,131],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},8,30,"research-report",{"id":120,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":122,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":126},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":128,"slug":130},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":132,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":134},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":86,"data":136},{"doc_id":83,"user_id":137,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":138,"doc_module":4,"category_id":116,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":139,"file_id":140,"file_url":141,"file_type":142,"file_size":143,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":116,"language":144,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":145,"faqs":146,"seo_title":147,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":148,"read_time":122,"preview_page_count":4},687197207057,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","Reviewer: 1  \nRecommendation: Publish in ACS Nano after minor revisions noted.  \nComments:  \nHamans et [al. report](al. report) super resolution imaging of the different coupling behaviour of single emitters with a localized plasmon resonance or lattice resonances. Both LSPR and SPR are supported by the nanoparticle array built by the authors, and the emitter is placed in two different locations so the effect of each resonance can be more clearly distinguished. The combination of numerical simulations with the impressive optical imaging technique illustrates the different behaviour of each resonance with the emitter. The work is well described and organized and the results are sound. I would recommend the acceptance of this work if the authors provide the following information:  \n‐ There are 2 resonances sustained by their array (LSPR and SPR) and there are two possible locations of the emitter (S1 and S2), yet the authors only present the results of the optimal coupling for each case (LSPR in S1, fig 3 and SPR S2 fig 4) . I would like to see also what happens to the other two possible results (LSPR in S2 and SPR in S1). In the case of the LSPR, it would illustrate how the emitter is influenced by the proximity of a metal antenna out of resonance, and what are the typical values of the Purcell factor and D. For the case of the SPR it looks like there is also near field excited at the base of the nanoantenna which could be interesting to analyze in the S1 configuration.  \nAUTHOR REPLY  \nThis is a very interesting point and it was also raised by reviewer \\#2 . In fact, we had already performed these measurements, but we did not include them in the manuscript, as their results were rather unsurprising. The requested experiments and the corresponding simulations are now placed in sections 6 and 7 of the Supporting Information.  \nFor sample S1, in which the emitters are placed at the bottom of the nanoparticles, when filtering the emission at 575±20 nm, corresponding to the SLR, we observe very similar patterns as when filtering the emission at 650±20 nm, corresponding to the LSPR. This can be easily seen by comparing the maps in Figure 3 with the ones now given in Figure S7 and reported here below.  \nFigure S7. Enhanced emission of single molecules preferentially coupled to the LSPR, while filtering at the wavelength of the SLR. (a) Normalized dye emission (yellow), array extinction (solid line), and emission filter transmission (dashed line) . (b) Two‐ dimensional histogram of the experimentally observed emission enhancement Iexp. Simulated (c) emission enhancement Isim,(d) Purcell factor FP,(e) enhancement in power radiated to the far‐field Frad, and (f) directivity enhancement D. Figures (b‐f) have  \n20 x 20 nm2 bins. The dashed lines denote the base of the nanostructure.  \nThis similarity is expected as the SLR has significant field enhancement also at the bottom of the particles, as shown in Figure 1f.  \nFor sample S2, in which the emitters are placed 250 nm above the substrate, when filtering the emission at 650±20 nm, corresponding to the LSPR, on the contrary, we observe a very different pattern than when filtering at 575±20 nm. This difference can be seen by comparing the maps in Figure 4 with the ones now given in Figure S8 and reported here below.  \nFigure S8. Enhanced emission of single molecules preferentially coupled to the SLR, while filtering at the wavelength of the LSPR. (a) Normalized dye emission (yellow), array extinction (solid line), and emission filter transmission (dashed line) . (b) Two‐ dimensional histogram of the experimentally observed emission enhancement Iexp. Simulated (c) emission enhancement Isim,(d) Purcell factor FP,(e) enhancement in power radiated to the far‐field Frad, and (f) directivity enhancement D. Figure (b) has 25 x  \n25 nm2 bins and Figures (c‐f) have 20 x 20 nm2 bins. The dashed lines denote the base of the nanostructure. In this case, the directivity enhancement observed right abov","cbCaidznH7r5cnRf","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidznH7r5cnRf","pdf",301473,"English","# Reviewer Recommendation\n## Requested additional results\n# Author Reply and Added Supporting Information\n## Sample S1 control at SLR wavelength\n## Sample S2 control at LSPR wavelength\n# Directivity Enhancement Clarification\n## Numerical aperture and simulation consistency","[{\"question\":\"What major revision did the reviewer request regarding resonance coupling results?\",\"answer\":\"The reviewer asked for results for the non-optimal emitter-location combinations: LSPR in S2 and SPR in S1, not only the optimal LSPR-in-S1 and SPR-in-S2 cases.\"},{\"question\":\"Where were the requested experiments and simulations added in the author response?\",\"answer\":\"The author states that the requested experiments and corresponding simulations were added to Sections 6 and 7 of the Supporting Information.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the emission enhancement patterns change between sample S1 and sample S2 under wavelength filtering?\",\"answer\":\"For sample S1, filtering at 575±20 nm (SLR) gives patterns very similar to filtering at 650±20 nm (LSPR). For sample S2, filtering at 650±20 nm (LSPR) produces a different pattern than filtering at 575±20 nm (SLR).\"},{\"question\":\"How is the directivity enhancement D related to the objective numerical aperture (NA)?\",\"answer\":\"The author reply clarifies that NA=1.4 used in the simulation is also used in the calculation of directivity, and that the value was included in the manuscript text.\"}]","ACSNano review process compiled - Minor revisions required | PDF",1789999600]