[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-597279-105":59,"doc-detail-597279-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","academic-misconduct-within-higher-education-in-canada","Academic Misconduct within Higher Education in Canada","","Despite extensive research on academic misconduct among U.S. high school and undergraduate students, evidence for Canada has been limited. This paper reports findings from a 2002–2003 study conducted across 11 Canadian higher education institutions. Academic misconduct occurs in Canada among high school, undergraduate, and graduate students, with common behaviours including unauthorized collaboration, test information acquisition, unreferenced copying, and falsified lab data. Contributing factors include student maturity, perceptions of misconduct, assessment and invigilation practices, perceived risk, policy weaknesses, and insufficient education in academic integrity.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/academic-misconduct-within-higher-education-in-canada/597279/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/academic-misconduct-within-higher-education-in-canada/597279.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Blue Pony","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What gap in research does the paper address?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It addresses the limited research on academic misconduct among Canadian high school and university students compared with the larger body of U.S.-based studies.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What study was conducted and where?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The paper presents results from a study at 11 Canadian higher education institutions between January 2002 and March 2003 (10 universities and one degree-granting college).",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which behaviours were commonly self-reported by students?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Common behaviours include working with others when individual work was required, getting test questions and answers from someone who has already taken the test, copying sentences without footnoting, fabricating or falsifying lab data, and receiving unauthorized help.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},597279,1792193107,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962090760266,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","CSSHE SCÉES  \nCanadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d’enseignement supérieur  \nVolume 36, No. 2, 2006, pages 1-21 [www.ingentaconnect.com/content/csshe/cjhe](www.ingentaconnect.com/content/csshe/cjhe)  \nAcademic Misconduct within Higher Education in Canada  \nJulia M. Christensen Hughes University of Guelph  \nDonald L. McCabe Rutgers University  \nABSTRACT  \nDespite a plethora of research on the academic misconduct carried out by  \nU.S. high school and undergraduate university students, little research has been done on the academic misconduct of Canadian students.  \nThis paper addresses this shortcoming by presenting the results of a study conducted at 11 Canadian higher education institutions between January 2002 and March 2003. We maintain that academic misconduct does indeed occur in Canada – amongst high school, undergraduate and graduate students. Common self-reported behaviours were as follows:  \nworking on an assignment with others when asked for individual work, getting questions and answers from someone who has already taken a test, copying a few sentences of material without footnoting, fabricating or falsifying lab data, and receiving unauthorized help on an assignment. Possible factors associated with these behaviours include student maturity, perceptions of what constitutes academic misconduct, faculty assessment and invigilation practices, low perceived risk, ineffective and poorly understood policies and procedures, anda lack of education on academic misconduct. Canadian educational institutions are encouraged to address these issues, beginning with arecommitment to academic integrity.  \nRÉSUMÉ  \nMalgré l’abondance de recherches sur la probité intellectuelle parmi les étudiantes et les étudiants de l’enseignement secondaire et universitaire  \n2 CJHE / RCES Volume 36, No. 2, 2006  \naux États-Unis, peu de recherches ont été effectuées sur ce sujet au Canada. Cet article vise à combler cette lacune en présentant les résultats d’une étude entreprise dans 11 établissements d’enseignementsupérieur au Canada entre janvier 2002 et mars 2003. Selon les résultats de l’étude, des manques à la probité intellectuelle se produisent eneffet au Canada, tant dans l’enseignement secondaire qu’au premier cycle et aux cycles supérieurs des universités. Les comportements les plus fréquemment rapportés par les répondants sont: travailler avecd’autres sur une tâche individuelle; obtenir des questions et réponses de personnes qui ont déjà passé un examen; plagier; fabriquer ou falsifier des données de laboratoire; et recevoir une aide interditedans l’accomplissement d’une tâche. Ces comportements peuvent être associés à divers facteurs: la maturité de l’étudiante ou de l’étudiant; la perception de la gravité du comportement en question; les pratiquesd’évaluation et de surveillance du corps enseignant ; la perception duniveau de risque; la clarté et l’efficacité des procédures établies; et à un manque d’éducation sur les questions de conduite universitaire. Les établissements d’enseignement canadiens sont encouragés à tenter de résoudre ces problèmes, en commençant par renouveler leur engagement envers la probité intellectuelle.  \nAcademic misconduct has become widely recognized as a significant problem amongst American high school and university students, but it is not known to what extent academic misconduct is a problem amongst Canadian high school and university students. This paper attempts to address this question by presenting the results of a study conducted at 11 Canadian higher education institutions (10 universities and one degree-granting college) between January 2002 and March 2003. We argue that academic misconduct does indeed occur in Canada amongst high school, undergraduate and graduate students and that both Canadian high schools and the higher education system need to recommit to the principles of academic integrity.  \nAcademic Misconduct in the U.S.: Common Behaviours and Explanations  \nU.S.-based research","cbCainFIB0NFB122","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainFIB0NFB122","pdf",99799,21,"English","# Academic Misconduct within Higher Education in Canada\n## Abstract and Study Scope\n## Academic Misconduct in the U.S.: Common Behaviours and Explanations","[{\"question\":\"What gap in research does the paper address?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses the limited research on academic misconduct among Canadian high school and university students compared with the larger body of U.S.-based studies.\"},{\"question\":\"What study was conducted and where?\",\"answer\":\"The paper presents results from a study at 11 Canadian higher education institutions between January 2002 and March 2003 (10 universities and one degree-granting college).\"},{\"question\":\"Which behaviours were commonly self-reported by students?\",\"answer\":\"Common behaviours include working with others when individual work was required, getting test questions and answers from someone who has already taken the test, copying sentences without footnoting, fabricating or falsifying lab data, and receiving unauthorized help.\"}]","Academic Misconduct within Higher Education in Canada | PDF",1792084731,53]