[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-595392-105":59,"doc-detail-595392-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","a-u-s-t-r-a-l-i-a-n-u-n-i-v-e-r-s-i-t-i-e-s-r-e-v-i-e-w-ross-williams-methodology-meaning-and-usefulness-of-rankings","A U S T R A L I A N U N I V E R S I T I E S ’ R E V I E W - Ross Williams - Methodology, meaning and usefulness of rankings","","University rankings exert significant influence on higher education systems and individual institutions. This paper explains the effects of rankings, outlines desirable characteristics for ranking methodologies, and reviews existing international practice, emphasizing Shanghai Jiao Tong and THES-QS. It examines how Australian universities perform globally and discusses how rankings shape institutional decision-making, incentives for data quality, benchmarking, and student choice through reputation and market signals.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/a-u-s-t-r-a-l-i-a-n-u-n-i-v-e-r-s-i-t-i-e-s-r-e-v-i-e-w-ross-williams-methodology-meaning-and-usefulness-of-rankings/595392/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/a-u-s-t-r-a-l-i-a-n-u-n-i-v-e-r-s-i-t-i-e-s-r-e-v-i-e-w-ross-williams-methodology-meaning-and-usefulness-of-rankings/595392.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Blitz","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why do international university rankings attract such broad demand?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Demand comes from multiple stakeholders, including students, employers, institutions, scholars, funding bodies, and governments. Technology and the World Wide Web have also increased information supply to meet this demand.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How do rankings affect decision-making within universities and national education systems?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Rankings influence decisions inside institutions and can affect national systems of education. In some countries, poor performance can motivate policy changes such as linking or consolidating institutions.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What principles guide a desirable university ranking methodology?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The paper highlights the Berlin principles: focus on outputs rather than inputs, be transparent, use verifiable data, and recognize diversity of missions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},595392,1792171843,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":39,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":46,"preview_page_count":4},24464137899374,"https://us-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","A U S T R A L I A N U N I V E R S I T I E S ’ R E V I E W  \nMethodology, meaning and usefulness of rankings  \nRoss Williams University of Melbourne  \nUniversity rankings are having a profound effect on both higher education systems and individual universities. In this paper we outline these effects, discuss the desirable characteristics of a good ranking methodology and document existing practice, with an emphasis on the two main international rankings (Shanghai Jiao Tong and THES-QS). We take a critical look at where Australian universities rank internationally.  \nIntroduction  \nGlobalisation, assisted by deregulation, has created the demand for international rankings. The demand originates from a range of stakeholders: students, employers, supranational institutions, scholars, funding agencies, and governments. In addition, there is public interest in rankings for their own sake, whether it be the world’s most liveable city or an international ranking of the quality of financial newspapers. Atthe same time as this expansion in demand, developments in technology, most noticeably the WorldWide Web, have facilitated the supply of information to meet demand.  \nInternational rankings are influencing decision making within institutions and even affecting national systems of education. France and Germany suffer in international rankings because quality research performance is spread over many institutions; these are often specialised and a significant number are not universities. The rankings have provided much motivation for the current policy in these countries of linking or consolidating institutions to establish larger entities.  \nSalmi and Saroyan (2007) note that in some countries authorities restrict scholarships for studies abroad to students admitted to highly ranked institutions. Donor agencies and foundations also look at international rankings to inform their decision making.  \nWithin universities, Hazelhorn (2007) reports that in her international survey of leaders and senior university administrators, fifty-six per cent indicated that their institution had a formal internal mechanism for reviewing their rank. Respondents also indicated that league tables played an important role in deciding on international collaborations.  \nAn obvious marketing benefit accrues to a university that is highly ranked in a study. But as with all forms of external appraisal there are a number of more indirect benefits. Rankings provide an incentive for better data collection within institutions, they can expose pockets of institutional weakness and confirm areas of strength, and they are useful for benchmarking against like institutions. Rankings encourage institutions to reexamine mission statements. For the university system as a whole, poor performance can be used to prod governments into action.  \nvol. 50, no. 2, 2008 Methodology, meaning and usefulness of rankings, Ross Williams 51  \nA U S T R A L I A N U N I V E R S I T I E S ’ R E V I E W  \nThe effect of league tables on student choice is more complex. The consensus seems to be that for rankings targeted at school leavers their direct influence is greatest for high achievers. It seems it is overall reputation which matters for undergraduate student choice and rankings are one factor feeding in to that perception. However, Marginson (2007b) notes that market research and anecdotal evidence from educational agents indicate that the international rankings published by Shanghai JiaoTong University are feeding directly into student choice at all levels, even though the rankings are based solely on research performance. Increasingly the international rankings are being interpreted as measuring the international standing of an institution.  \nIn Australia, over the last two decades, the lifting of restrictions on the enrolment of fee-paying international students combined with a freezing of funding for government subsidised students has made universities heavily dependent for growth on inc","cbCairuxNi9OaMh4","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairuxNi9OaMh4","pdf",180970,"English","# Introduction\n## Drivers of international ranking demand\n## Institutional and national impacts\n## Benefits and incentives of rankings\n# Ranking Methodologies\n## Berlin principles and good practice guidelines\n## Stakeholder attributes and separate evaluation\n## Measuring research performance and teaching quality","[{\"question\":\"Why do international university rankings attract such broad demand?\",\"answer\":\"Demand comes from multiple stakeholders, including students, employers, institutions, scholars, funding bodies, and governments. Technology and the World Wide Web have also increased information supply to meet this demand.\"},{\"question\":\"How do rankings affect decision-making within universities and national education systems?\",\"answer\":\"Rankings influence decisions inside institutions and can affect national systems of education. In some countries, poor performance can motivate policy changes such as linking or consolidating institutions.\"},{\"question\":\"What principles guide a desirable university ranking methodology?\",\"answer\":\"The paper highlights the Berlin principles: focus on outputs rather than inputs, be transparent, use verifiable data, and recognize diversity of missions.\"}]","A U S T R A L I A N U N I V E R S I T I E S ’ R E V I E W - Ross Williams - Methodology, meaning and usefulness of rankings | PDF",1792081054]