[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-601925-105":59,"doc-detail-601925-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","a-summary-of-the-current-landscape-of-superintendent-evaluation-practices-and-preferences","A Summary of the Current Landscape of Superintendent Evaluation Practices and Preferences","","Increasing emphasis on evidence-based superintendent evaluation challenges U.S. school board directors because existing methods are often inconsistent and misaligned with clear criteria. This study examines superintendent evaluation practices across multiple Washington State districts and compares them with superintendent preferences using survey data from 57 superintendents. Descriptive statistics and paired-sample t-tests show that statewide practices remain inconsistent and frequently subjective, with feedback only moderately helpful and often not supported by measurable data. Many districts exhibit statistically significant gaps between practice and preference.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/a-summary-of-the-current-landscape-of-superintendent-evaluation-practices-and-preferences/601925/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/a-summary-of-the-current-landscape-of-superintendent-evaluation-practices-and-preferences/601925.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"CatatanPagi","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem does the study address about superintendent evaluation?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It addresses that current evaluation practices for superintendents are inconsistent across districts and often not aligned to specific criteria, resulting in subjective feedback.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How was the research conducted?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The study collected survey data from 57 superintendents and used descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-tests to analyze results.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What did the findings show about evaluation feedback?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Feedback is typically moderately helpful but often not supported with measurable data, and practices can differ significantly from superintendent preferences in many cases.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},601925,1792168013,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090894170,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","A Summary of the Current Landscape of Superintendent Evaluation Practices and  \nPreferences  \nRobin Henrikson  \nSeattle Pacific University  \nIncreasing emphasis on evidence-based evaluation processes in districts across the United States challenges school board directors to call into question their current evaluation practices of superintendents. Existing methods tend to be inconsistent and not aligned to specific criteria (Hendricks, 2013). This study investigates the current landscape of superintendent evaluation across a variety of districts in Washington State and to determine any differences between current practices and superintendent preference. Survey data were collected from 57 superintendents. Descriptive statistics and paired samples t-tests were used to analyze results. The findings from this research confirmed that current practices for evaluation of superintendents are inconsistent across the state and often subjective. Typically, feedback is moderately helpful and not supported with measurable data. In many cases, there was a statistically significant difference between evaluation practice and superintendent preference.  \nKeywords: Superintendent, evaluation, accountability, leadership, governance  \nICPEL Education Leadership Review, Vol. 20, No. 1– November, 2019 ISSN: 1532-0723 © 2019 International Council of Professors of Educational Leadership  \nWith the increased implementation of a standards-based approach to evaluation using instructional frameworks for teachers and principals, many districts and states are seeking out methods for replicating this type of practice with superintendents (Lashway, Cohn, Gore, and Sharratt, 2013) . Results of research over the past two decades reveal that the evaluation of superintendents has been inconsistent both in practice and in what and how they are being evaluated (Eadie, 2008) . Furthermore, superintendents have indicated a lack of satisfaction with current evaluation practices (Mayo, and McCartney, 2004) . There is limited professional learning support for school board members on how to successfully implement a cycle of evaluation, both summative and formative that reflects the dynamic, multi-faceted and increasingly political role of the superintendent (Bjork, Kowalski, and Browne-Ferrigno, 2014) . This political and social pressure is often ubiquitous and may affect the relationships between the board members and superintendent (Moody, 2011) . The superintendent must learn how to decipher this landscape tobe successful both with the greater community as well as with the respective board members (Tekniepe, 2015) . The evaluation process can be viewed as a support mechanism for nurturing relationships and fostering improvement through articulating clear expectations and goals for improvement (Vranish, 2011) .  \nThe interplay of a school board of directors as a governing body and evaluator of the superintendent brings with it unique challenges. Even if states or districts have a policy or contractual language that outlines the evaluation method for the superintendent, the implementation of the evaluation process can be inconsistent (Eadie, 2008) . School board members maintain a level of governance that remains primarily outside of the daily operations of a district. Board members often lack the understanding of how to utilize a system for evaluation ina sustainable way (Hendricks, 2013; Vranish, 2011) . This creates a reliance on the superintendent to train her/his board on how to evaluate in a productive and effective way (Henrikson, 2018) . It is also difficult to create a comprehensive sense of “voice” or utilize an evidence-based process when typically only the superintendent offers the evidence of fulfilling his/her duties as the district leader. Candoli, Cullen, and Stuffelbeam (1997) found that current superintendent evaluation systems are not serving the educational community sufficiently.  \nOne of the most indispensable duties of the school board is to effec","cbCait8XXZujigSG","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCait8XXZujigSG","pdf",281890,22,"English","# Background and Rationale\n## Evidence-based evaluation and standards-based approaches\n## Challenges for school boards and superintendents\n# Research Purpose and Methods\n## Survey design and participants\n## Data analysis approach\n# Findings\n## Consistency, objectivity, and measurable evidence\n## Differences between practice and preferences\n# Implications for Evaluation Cycles","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the study address about superintendent evaluation?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses that current evaluation practices for superintendents are inconsistent across districts and often not aligned to specific criteria, resulting in subjective feedback.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the research conducted?\",\"answer\":\"The study collected survey data from 57 superintendents and used descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-tests to analyze results.\"},{\"question\":\"What did the findings show about evaluation feedback?\",\"answer\":\"Feedback is typically moderately helpful but often not supported with measurable data, and practices can differ significantly from superintendent preferences in many cases.\"}]","A Summary of the Current Landscape of Superintendent Evaluation Practices and Preferences | PDF",1792093704,55]