[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-503944-105":59,"doc-detail-503944-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","a-responsibility-system-standard-option-and-two-alternative-options-2014-2015-2015-2016","A RESPONSIBILITY SYSTEM - Standard Option And Two Alternative Options - 2014-2015 & 2015-2016","","An NH responsibility system outlines standard and alternative assessment options for 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, covering NH accountability history and standards status in ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Arts. After three testing versions, the system critiques misalignment among state, district, and school assessments and highlights concerns about top-down design, confidentiality, and excessive testing. Three options are compared: Standard-SBAC, an alternative SBAC/SAT/ACT approach, and an alternative PACE performance assessment model with district requirements, pilot expectations, and educator evaluation use. An Epping assessment plan maps screening, common, performance, and state accountability by grade bands.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/a-responsibility-system-standard-option-and-two-alternative-options-2014-2015-2015-2016/503944/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/a-responsibility-system-standard-option-and-two-alternative-options-2014-2015-2015-2016/503944.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Stanley","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What are the three NH accountability assessment options proposed?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Option One uses Standard-SBAC, Option Two uses SBAC in elementary and middle schools plus SAT or ACT in high school, and Option Three uses PACE performance assessment with competency-based district assessments and state-validated testing.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Why does the document say the current assessment system does not work well?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It states that state, district, and school assessment do not integrate effectively, the system is too top down, one-size testing does not fit all schools, and there are concerns about too much testing and student data confidentiality.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the PACE pilot require districts to do?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Districts must use state competencies in ELA, math, and science plus work-study practices, use a bank of validated performance tasks, adopt a PD model for design and scoring, use performance assessment data in educator evaluation, and participate in district peer review audit.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},503944,1791357727,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":41},2336477405376,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","| “A RESPONSIBILITY SYSTEM”NH ACCOUNTABILITY\u003Cbr>|\n| --- |\n| \u003Cbr>Standard Option And\u003Cbr>Two Alternative Options\u003Cbr>For\u003Cbr>2014-2015 & 2015-2016 |\n|  |\n\n| NH Accountability History |\n| --- |\n| Version 0.0 – NHIEAP\u003Cbr>􀁹 Grades 3, 8, & 11\u003Cbr>Version 1.0-NECAP\u003Cbr>􀁹 Grades 3 to 8 (2005)\u003Cbr>􀁹 Grade 11 (2007)\u003Cbr>Version 2.0 – NH Waiver \\#1\u003Cbr>􀁹 1.0 plus student growth, CCSS, & teacher/leader effectiveness\u003Cbr>􀁹 2013-2014 & 2014-2015\u003Cbr>Version 3.0 – NH Waiver \\#2-Under Discussion\u003Cbr>􀁹 NH waiver being built this fall\u003Cbr>􀁹 Includes standard option & 2 alternative options |\n|  |\n\n| NH Standards Status\u003Cbr>|\n| --- |\n| 􀁹 ELA – NH Standards based on CCSS\u003Cbr>􀁹 Math – NH Standards based on CCSS\u003Cbr>􀁹 Science – NH Standards (Next Generation?)\u003Cbr>􀁹 Social Studies – Due out next year\u003Cbr>􀁹 Arts – Due out next year |\n|  |\n\n| What NH Now Knows After 3 Testing Versions |\n| --- |\n| 􀁹 State, district, & school assessment do not work well together\u003Cbr>􀁹 Present system is too top down\u003Cbr>􀁹 Greater local control yields richer discussion\u003Cbr>􀁹 One size assessment does not fit all districts & schools\u003Cbr>􀁹 There are concerns about too much testing\u003Cbr>􀁹 There are concerns about confidentiality of student data\u003Cbr>􀁹 Quality teaching & learning requires quality assessment & timely feedback\u003Cbr>􀁹 Real world application of learning requires a depth of knowledge & work-study skills\u003Cbr>􀁹 Standardized testing yields too much competition & questionable predictions for readiness\u003Cbr>􀁹 CIA, PD, evaluation, & accountability need to work together |\n|  |\n\n| Option One – Standard-SBAC\u003Cbr>|\n| --- |\n| Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)\u003Cbr>􀁹 All NH school districts will participate in option one unless opting to participate in an alternative option\u003Cbr>􀁹 SBAC includes a consortium of 23 states\u003Cbr>􀁹 ELA and math assessed in the spring starting 2015\u003Cbr>􀁹 Test implemented using computer technology\u003Cbr>􀁹 Test implemented in Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 11 |\n|  |\n\n| Option Two –Alternative – SBAC/SAT/ACT\u003Cbr>|\n| --- |\n| SBAC In Elementary & Middle Schools SAT or ACT in High School\u003Cbr>Grade 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8\u003Cbr>􀁹 SBAC\u003Cbr>Grade 11\u003Cbr>􀁹 SAT or ACT\u003Cbr>􀁹 College Board is redesigning test to align with CCSS\u003Cbr>􀁹 ACT is reported to align with CCSS |\n|  |\n\n| Option Three –Alternative-PACE\u003Cbr>|\n| --- |\n| Performance Assessment Competency Education\u003Cbr>􀁹 District performance assessments\u003Cbr>􀁹 State validated testing in one grade for each school\u003Cbr>􀁹 District would have representative on state policy group\u003Cbr>􀁹 Kentucky and NH are currently considering including PACE in next federal waiver (fall 2014)\u003Cbr>􀁹 Maine, Rhode Island, Vermont, & Connecticut are also considering a performance assessment system |\n|  |\n\n| PACE Pilot Requirements |\n| --- |\n| 􀁹 Use state competencies in ELA, math, & science and state work-study practices\u003Cbr>􀁹 Use state & national open source bank of validated performance assessment tasks\u003Cbr>􀁹 Use PD model that provides support in design, implementation, & scoring performance assessments\u003Cbr>􀁹 Use performance assessment data in educator evaluation\u003Cbr>􀁹 Participate in district peer review audit\u003Cbr>􀁹 Base district accountability on performance assessmentsin addition to other measures such as graduation, etc. |\n|  |\n\n| NH Accountability Option Summary |\n| --- |\n| SBAC Spring 2015 SAT/ACT 1415 & 1516 PACE 1415 & 1516 Standardized test aligned to CCSS Standardized test aligned to CCSS (SAT in revision) Competency-based system aligned to CCSS Standardized test Standardized test\u003Cbr>• SBAC\u003Cbr>• SAT or ACT Performance-based test validated by standardized test in one grade level per school Designed by SBAC Designed by SAT/ACT Designed by NH educators Aligned to CCSS SAT being aligned to CCSS, ACT aligned Aligned to district competencies which are aligned to CCSS Implemented in set testing period Implemented in set testing period Implemented in district assessment schedule Computer test Paper/pencil test Performance task based SBAC formatives SAT/ACT formatives District formatives ELA & ","cbCaiqujnlcoFGMP","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqujnlcoFGMP","pdf",169964,12,"English","# NH Accountability History\n# NH Standards Status\n# What NH Now Knows After 3 Testing Versions\n# Option One – Standard-SBAC\n# Option Two – Alternative – SBAC/SAT/ACT\n# Option Three – Alternative – PACE\n# PACE Pilot Requirements\n# NH Accountability Option Summary\n# Epping Assessment Plan\n## Plan with Standard Option\n## Plan with PACE Option","[{\"question\":\"What are the three NH accountability assessment options proposed?\",\"answer\":\"Option One uses Standard-SBAC, Option Two uses SBAC in elementary and middle schools plus SAT or ACT in high school, and Option Three uses PACE performance assessment with competency-based district assessments and state-validated testing.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the document say the current assessment system does not work well?\",\"answer\":\"It states that state, district, and school assessment do not integrate effectively, the system is too top down, one-size testing does not fit all schools, and there are concerns about too much testing and student data confidentiality.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the PACE pilot require districts to do?\",\"answer\":\"Districts must use state competencies in ELA, math, and science plus work-study practices, use a bank of validated performance tasks, adopt a PD model for design and scoring, use performance assessment data in educator evaluation, and participate in district peer review audit.\"}]","A RESPONSIBILITY SYSTEM - Standard Option And Two Alternative Options - 2014-2015 & 2015-2016 | PDF",1791061961]