[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-32044":3,"doc-seo-32044":28},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":25,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":26,"read_time":27},32044,549758252649,"Ivy","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000253669c5317157?_k=1778319167496531819",8,"Research & Report","A Novel Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Material for the Recognition of Ochratoxin A","A novel molecularly imprinted polymer composite (OTA-MIPs) is created by coupling a metal–organic framework single-crystal ordered macroporous ZIF-8 (as scaffold) with a newly synthesized dummy template structural analog of ochratoxin A (OTA). Thermal polymerization forms imprinted binding sites on the ZIF-8 surface, enabling selective rebinding. Structural and adsorption properties are assessed by infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and N2 adsorption. Langmuir fitting outperforms Freundlich, and OTA-MIPs show 6.8-fold higher affinity than non-imprinted OTA-NIPs with strong specificity and limited performance decline after five reuses, supporting OTA enrichment from complex food matrices.","cbCaie2XcIhpow2i","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaie2XcIhpow2i","pdf",2226449,3,1,11,"English","en","# Abstract\n# Introduction\n# Experimental part\n## Materials\n## Synthesis and characterization","[{\"question\":\"How are OTA-MIPs prepared in this study?\",\"answer\":\"OTA-MIPs are synthesized by thermal polymerization on the surface of the ZIF-8 single-crystal ordered macropore support. A dummy template molecular analog of OTA is first synthesized, then used to form imprinted recognition sites during polymerization.\"},{\"question\":\"What methods are used to characterize the prepared polymer material?\",\"answer\":\"Infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and N2 adsorption are used to characterize the OTA-MIPs, including their network structure, surface area, and pore characteristics.\"},{\"question\":\"How do OTA-MIPs perform compared with non-imprinted polymers and similar toxins?\",\"answer\":\"Adsorption data fit the Langmuir model better than the Freundlich model. OTA-MIPs show 6.8-fold higher affinity than the corresponding non-imprinted OTA-NIPs and exhibit high specificity for OTA compared with patulin and zearalenone, with only a slight performance decrease after five reuse cycles.\"}]",1780693347,28,{"code":4,"msg":29,"data":30},"ok",{"site_id":31,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":26},105,"a-novel-molecularly-imprinted-polymer-material-for-the-recognition-of-ochratoxin-a","",{"@graph":35,"@context":84},[36,52,67],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,49],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":48,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/a-novel-molecularly-imprinted-polymer-material-for-the-recognition-of-ochratoxin-a/32044/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":40,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-11","2026-06-05",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"How are OTA-MIPs prepared in this study?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"OTA-MIPs are synthesized by thermal polymerization on the surface of the ZIF-8 single-crystal ordered macropore support. A dummy template molecular analog of OTA is first synthesized, then used to form imprinted recognition sites during polymerization.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"What methods are used to characterize the prepared polymer material?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"Infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and N2 adsorption are used to characterize the OTA-MIPs, including their network structure, surface area, and pore characteristics.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"How do OTA-MIPs perform compared with non-imprinted polymers and similar toxins?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"Adsorption data fit the Langmuir model better than the Freundlich model. OTA-MIPs show 6.8-fold higher affinity than the corresponding non-imprinted OTA-NIPs and exhibit high specificity for OTA compared with patulin and zearalenone, with only a slight performance decrease after five reuse cycles.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":31}]