[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-325944-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-325944-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","96th-congress-report-no-29-congressional-adjournment-nuclear-power-energy-policy","96th Congress - Report No. 29 - Congressional Adjournment - Nuclear Power - Energy Policy","","96th Congress, First Session Report No. 29 outlines developments around congressional adjournment expectations, including competing rumors about when the first session will end. It describes congressional consideration of a proposed moratorium on nuclear reactor licensing, highlighting the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s preference for a temporary moratorium tied to safety and training improvements rather than a broad pause. It also summarizes House action on an energy mobilization bill, contrasting positions, amendments, and outcomes prior to conference negotiations.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/96th-congress-report-no-29-congressional-adjournment-nuclear-power-energy-policy/325944/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/96th-congress-report-no-29-congressional-adjournment-nuclear-power-energy-policy/325944.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Quinn","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",15,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What timing rumors are discussed regarding adjournment of the 96th Congress first session?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Rumors target December 14 as a possible adjournment date, but veteran observers do not rule out dates in the following week.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How did the Nuclear Regulatory Commission view proposals for a nuclear reactor licensing moratorium?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The NRC opposed congressional enforcement of a general pause, supporting only a temporary moratorium to ensure essential improvements, while arguing licensing should continue case-by-case.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What was the House outcome for the Udall-Clausen-Wirth substitute energy bill and what changes were made?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"On November 1, the House rejected the substitute by a 192-215 vote in favor of a modified Dingell bill, with differing modifications including attempts to adjust waiver authority and related provisions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},325944,1790447221,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":97,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962075114765,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","96th Congress1st Session  \nReport No.29  \n## CONGRESSIONAL ADJOURNMENT\n\nThe annual guessing game about when the first session of the 96th Congress wi11 beadjourned has already begun.Rumors persist that the \"leadership\"has set December 14 asa target date,but veteran Capitol Hill observers are not counting out any date in theweek following that.  \n## NUCLEAR POWER\n\nAs Congress begins to consider recent legislative proposals to impose a moratoriumon nuclear reactors,opposition to such a mandate surfaced among members of the NuclearRegulatory Coumission(NRC).According to Chalrman Joseph Hendrie,NRC commiss1onersconcur with the recent Kemeny Commission recommendation that only a temporary moratorlumbe imposed to insure that essential improvements in nuclear facilities are made.They donot support Congresslonal enforcement of such action.  \nHendrie and other NRC members explained their views during a hearing before asubcommittee of the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee on November 5.Hendrie naintained that a \"de facto\"moratorium on new plant licensing is current1y inforce,as no new permits w11l be issued until safety precautions are vastly improved,training programs for operators enhanced,and state and local emergency action programsapproved.  But,he said,there is no need to impose a general pause on the licensing ofal1 plants when investigations of each proposed facility will reveal the need for1mprovements in different areas.  Thus,licensing should u1timately continue--possiblybeginning as early as next spring--on a case-by-case basis,insuring that necessaryimprovements in safety and management have been made for each individual reactor.Inaddition,Hendrie indicated that no licensing nor granting of permits will be allowedwithout concurrence of the Commissioners themselves.  \n## ENERGY POLICY\n\nBy a 192-215 vote,the House on November 1 rejected the Udal1-Clausen-Wirthsubstitute Energy Mobilization Board bil1 in favor of a modified Dingell bi11.  TheDingell b111 was supported by the Carter Administration and various special interests.It was opposed by environmental and public interest groups and the national associationsof the governors,counties and cities.  \nThe week preceding the House action saw both Rep.Udall and Rep.Dingell makingmajor modificaticns to the bills originally reported by the_Interior and CommerceCommittees.Uda11 strengthened somewhat the powers of the ENB under his version,butprohibited any walver of substantive law and retained a number of protections such anopportunity for judicial review.  \nRep.Dingell moved his bil1 considerably closer to Rep.Udall's bill in an_effort togain suppcrt.He agreed to a major modification in the authority of the EMB to waivefedera1,state and local laws.Under the modified _version,which contained provisionsDingell had strenuously resisted in committee,the EMB could apply state and local 1awsand hand down a decision if a state or locality missed a decision deadline imposed by theEMB.  A waiver of federal 1aw wou1d take concurrence by both houses rather thanautomatically occur unless vetoed by one house as in the original Dingell bil1.  \nTHIISISALEREE SERVICE  \nNovember 9,1979  \nUDALL SUBSTITUTE  \nNOE3—215  \nAcldabboAlbostaAlexanderAndrews,N.C.Andrews,  \nMurtha  \nFountain  \nFrenze  \nMyers,Ind.Myers,Pa.  \nFrost  \nNatcher  \nGaydos  \nGlaimo  \nNedzl  \nGibbons  \nN.Dak.AununzioAnthonyApplegateArcherAshleyAtkinsondhamBafalisBalleyBarnardBeard,Tenn.BenjaminBennettBevIllBlaggiBianchardBoggsBonerBrinkleyBrademasBresuxBrooksBouquardBroomneldBrown,OhloBroyhiilBuchanangeBuriLsonButlerByronCampbellCarneyCarterChappellClevelandClingerColemanCollns,Tex.CourterCrne.DanlDantei,DanDaniel,R.W.DannemeyerDavis,Mich.Davis.8.C.dela GarzaDerrickDevineDiggDingellDoughertyDuncan,Oreg.Duncan,Tenn.Edwards,Ala.EngllahErlenbornErtelEvana,C.FaryFascellFerraroFithlanFlippoFoleyFord,Mlch.Forsythe  \nWels口  \nNichols  \nGinn  \nO'Brlen  \nGlickman  \nGonzales  \nPashayan  \nGrammGrassley  \nPatten  \nPepper  \nPerkins ","cbCaivWBlbtMa9FJ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivWBlbtMa9FJ","pdf",1234707,"English","# CONGRESSIONAL ADJOURNMENT\n# NUCLEAR POWER\n# ENERGY POLICY","[{\"question\":\"What timing rumors are discussed regarding adjournment of the 96th Congress first session?\",\"answer\":\"Rumors target December 14 as a possible adjournment date, but veteran observers do not rule out dates in the following week.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the Nuclear Regulatory Commission view proposals for a nuclear reactor licensing moratorium?\",\"answer\":\"The NRC opposed congressional enforcement of a general pause, supporting only a temporary moratorium to ensure essential improvements, while arguing licensing should continue case-by-case.\"},{\"question\":\"What was the House outcome for the Udall-Clausen-Wirth substitute energy bill and what changes were made?\",\"answer\":\"On November 1, the House rejected the substitute by a 192-215 vote in favor of a modified Dingell bill, with differing modifications including attempts to adjust waiver authority and related provisions.\"}]","96th Congress - Report No. 29 - Congressional Adjournment - Nuclear Power - Energy Policy | PDF",1789971796,13]