[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-158719-105":59,"doc-detail-158719-en":134},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":127,"head_meta":129,"extra_data":131,"updated_unix":133},105,"en","2026-performance-framework-target-setting-november-2025","2026 Performance Framework Target Setting - November 2025","","Presentation outlining 2026 performance framework target setting and the decision process for statewide school and district targets. It revisits existing digital PSAT/SAT targets, including a proposal to review and possibly re-norm targets for 2026 using normative percentile methodology (15th-50th-85th). The deck compares state board options for holding, waiting to revise, increasing and reviewing, or using other revisions, and summarizes stakeholder feedback, timelines, and actions required for board voting.",{"@graph":69,"@context":126},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/2026-performance-framework-target-setting-november-2025/158719/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/2026-performance-framework-target-setting-november-2025/158719.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Bill Black","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-08-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118,122],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of the presentation for 2026 target setting?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It sets context for revisiting performance framework targets, re-examining digital PSAT/SAT targets, and reviewing options and field feedback. It also prepares the board to vote on 2026 school and district targets.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How are baseline sub-indicator targets determined for revised metrics?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"A normative percentile rank methodology is used to establish baselined sub-indicator targets for Achievement, Growth, and PWR. The document notes revisions use the 15th-50th-85th percentile approach as necessary.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What options are available to the State Board regarding PSAT/SAT targets for 2026?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The deck presents options including holding existing targets, waiting to review/revise after 2026 results are available, increasing and reviewing with updates to match a 2025 baseline and later 2026 results, and pursuing other revisions that require guidance for a new methodology.",{"name":123,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":124},"What concerns and preferences were reported from stakeholder groups?",{"text":125,"@type":113},"Stakeholders generally emphasized predictability and avoiding too many changes right before frameworks are calculated. Several groups preferred Option 1, highlighting the need for clear communication and transparency, especially around anticipated cut-score changes and the rationale for adjustments.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":128,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":130,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":132,"site_id":62},158719,1788006937,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":135},{"doc_id":132,"user_id":136,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":137,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":138,"file_id":139,"file_url":140,"file_type":141,"file_size":142,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":143,"language":144,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":145,"faqs":146,"seo_title":147,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":133,"read_time":148,"preview_page_count":4},24189269381491,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/160000cf11732dd8392?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1788146458752108895","2026 Performance Framework Target Setting  \nNovember 2025  \n● Context Setting Purpose of Today’s Presentation  \n● Revisit Digital PSAT/SAT Targets  \n○ Proposal to review & potentially re-norm some targets for 2026  \n● Overall Performance Frameworks Targets  \n○ Sub-Indicator Targets  \n○ Overall Ratings Targets  \n● Recap the target setting process and options  \n● Review additional feedback from the field  \n● Prepare Board to vote on the 2026 school and district performance framework targets.  \n● References  \nContext| Timeline for 2026 Performance Frameworks  \n\n| Date | Activity |\n| --- | --- |\n| October 2025 | SBE Meeting: Presentation on proposed 2026 targets |\n| November 2025 | SBE Meeting: Vote on 2026 statewide targets |\n| August 2026 | 2026 Preliminary frameworks released |\n| November/December 2026 | SBE Meeting: 2026 Plan types finalized |\n\nSub-Indicators | Example  \nSub-Indicator Targets  \nSub-Indicators | Methodology for Setting Targets for Revised Metrics  \n● A normative percentile rank methodology is used to determine the baselined sub-indicator targets for Achievement, Growth and PWR  \nSub-Indicator Targets | Options for State Board  \nCDE is requesting guidance from the State Board on how to approach options for PSAT/SAT Targets:  \n| \\# | Option | Description |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 1 | Hold: Hold existing targets | Keep 2026 sub-indicator targets consistent with 2024 baseline. |\n| 2 | Wait to Review/Revise: Hold existing targets but plan to update PSAT/SAT based on 2026 results (if needed) | Keep 2026 sub-indicator targets consistent with 2024 baseline. Review PSAT/SAT and potentially revise targets once 2026 data become available. If appropriate, reconcile 1-and 3-year targets.* |\n| 3 | Increase and Review/Revise:\u003Cbr>Hold existing targets but\u003Cbr>update PSAT/SAT to 2025 baseline and update based on 2026 results (if needed) | Keep 2026 sub-indicator targets consistent with 2024 baseline, except for PSAT/SAT which will be updated to match 2025. Review and potentially lower targets once 2026 data become available. If appropriate, reconcile 1-and 3-year targets.* |\n| 4 | Other revision | CDE would need more guidance from the state board for a new methodology. |\n\n* Targets will be revised (as necessary) using 15-50-85th percentile methodology  \nSub-Indicator Targets | Potential Approaches to 2026  \nOption 1: Hold. Keep 2026 sub-indicator targets consistent with 2024 baseline.  \n| Pros | Cons | Considerations |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| - Districts/schools are familiar with | - If the 2026 PSAT/SAT results are considerably |  |\n| the 2024 baseline PSAT/SAT | different from 2024 baseline, the Achievement | Cut-score changes could |\n| cut-scores and may already have | and PWR measures will likely not differentiate | be implemented in the |\n| developed approaches aimed at | between sites well using the 15th-50th-85th | 2027 frameworks based on |\n| those targets. | percentiles. | 2026 outcomes. |\n| - Assurance that the 2026 targets | - Sites may see artificially inflated SAT ratings if |  |\n| will not move, regardless of the | 2026 results align with 2025. This has |  |\n| 2026 results. | implications for plan type assignments. |  |\n\nAdditional Feedback from the Field  \n● Special thanks to all of the stakeholder groups for loaning CDE time on their agendas with such a quick turnaround request.  \n● All groups had a healthy and meaningful discussion-and they all could have used more time to discuss and come to consensus.  \n● These notes are approximations of the general sentiments and do not necessarily capture all of the individual contributions.  \n\n| Stakeholder Group | General Preference | Rationale/General Feedback |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Accountability Work Group (AWG) | Varied with most leaning toward Option 1 | - Preference for keeping targets steady and predictable until there was at least 3 years of data.\u003Cbr>- Emphasis on clear communication and transparency, including building messaging around anticipated increases in cut s","cbCaigPdrlJfSciL","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigPdrlJfSciL","pdf",1910592,25,"English","# Context Setting\n## Purpose of Today’s Presentation\n## Timeline for 2026 Performance Frameworks\n# Digital PSAT/SAT Targets\n## Revisit Digital PSAT/SAT Targets\n## Proposal to review and potentially re-norm for 2026\n# Overall Performance Framework Targets\n## Sub-Indicator Targets\n## Overall Ratings Targets\n# Target Setting Methodology and Options\n## Methodology for Setting Targets for Revised Metrics\n## Options for State Board\n### Hold existing targets\n### Wait to review/revise\n### Increase and review/revise\n### Other revision\n# Recap and Feedback\n## Recap target setting process and options\n## Additional feedback from the field\n# Board Vote Preparation\n## Prepare Board to vote on 2026 targets\n# References","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the presentation for 2026 target setting?\",\"answer\":\"It sets context for revisiting performance framework targets, re-examining digital PSAT/SAT targets, and reviewing options and field feedback. It also prepares the board to vote on 2026 school and district targets.\"},{\"question\":\"How are baseline sub-indicator targets determined for revised metrics?\",\"answer\":\"A normative percentile rank methodology is used to establish baselined sub-indicator targets for Achievement, Growth, and PWR. The document notes revisions use the 15th-50th-85th percentile approach as necessary.\"},{\"question\":\"What options are available to the State Board regarding PSAT/SAT targets for 2026?\",\"answer\":\"The deck presents options including holding existing targets, waiting to review/revise after 2026 results are available, increasing and reviewing with updates to match a 2025 baseline and later 2026 results, and pursuing other revisions that require guidance for a new methodology.\"},{\"question\":\"What concerns and preferences were reported from stakeholder groups?\",\"answer\":\"Stakeholders generally emphasized predictability and avoiding too many changes right before frameworks are calculated. Several groups preferred Option 1, highlighting the need for clear communication and transparency, especially around anticipated cut-score changes and the rationale for adjustments.\"}]","2026 Performance Framework Target Setting - November 2025 | PDF",63]