[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-585639-105":59,"doc-detail-585639-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","20172019-implementation-evaluation-of-the-national-math-and-science-initiatives-college-readiness-program-deliverable-march-30-2021","2017–2019 Implementation Evaluation of the National Math and Science Initiative’s College Readiness Program - Deliverable - March 30, 2021","","2017–2019 Implementation Evaluation of the National Math and Science Initiative’s College Readiness Program (CRP) assesses how the three-year initiative affects Advanced Placement (AP) outcomes and school-level implementation. The study uses a randomized cluster trial across 48 CRP schools and 48 comparison schools in 10 states, analyzing AP exam data from multiple years. Findings estimate higher AP exam participation probabilities in program schools, alongside evaluation of school perspectives, culture, and implementation fidelity through structured research questions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/20172019-implementation-evaluation-of-the-national-math-and-science-initiatives-college-readiness-program-deliverable-march-30-2021/585639/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/20172019-implementation-evaluation-of-the-national-math-and-science-initiatives-college-readiness-program-deliverable-march-30-2021/585639.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Alex Sinclair","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the College Readiness Program (CRP) and what does it aim to improve?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"CRP is designed to support STEM-focused high school success, particularly in English, mathematics, and science AP courses, with attention to students traditionally underrepresented in those AP classes.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How was the CRP impact evaluated in this report?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"CRESST used a randomized cluster trial with CRP and comparison schools across 10 states and analyzed AP exam data using a two-level hierarchical generalized linear model (students nested within schools).",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What do the results indicate about AP exam participation in program schools versus comparison schools?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The analyses show statistically significant increases in the probability of taking an AP exam in program schools, with effects reported as higher in 2018 and even greater in 2019.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},585639,1792162480,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1099523882182,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","2017–2019 Implementation Evaluation of the National Math and Science Initiative’s  \nCollege Readiness Program  \nNMSI/20160003/Years 2 & 3/Deliverable – March 30, 2021  \nJulia Phelan, Jeffrey Egger, Junok Kim, Kilchan Choi, Eunhee Keum, Gregory K. W. K. Chung,  \nand Eva L. Baker  \nCRESST/University of California, Los Angeles  \nNational Center for Research on Evaluation,  \nStandards, and Student Testing (CRESST)  \nCenter for the Study of Evaluation (CSE)  \nGraduate School of Education & Information Studies  \nUniversity of California, Los Angeles  \n300 Charles E. Young Drive North  \nGSE&IS Bldg., Box 951522  \nLos Angeles, CA 90095-1522  \n(310) 206-1532  \nCopyright © 2021 The Regents ofthe University of California.  \nThe work reported herein was supported by a subgrant from the National Math and Science Initiative, award number 20160003, to the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) . The work was made possible by funding from the U.S. Department of Education to the National Math and Science Initiative.  \nThe findings and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the National Math and Science Initiative or the U.S. Department of Education.  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nExecutive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1  \nI. Introduction .............................................................................................................................2  \nII. Program Description ...............................................................................................................4  \nIII. Research Questions .................................................................................................................6  \nIV. Results for the Impact Study ...................................................................................................8  \nV. Results for Implementation Evaluation ................................................................................36  \nVI. Summary ............................................................................................................................. 138  \nVII. References ........................................................................................................................... 144  \nAppendix A: Propensity Score Matching Results .......................................................................145  \nAppendix B: Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model .................................................................150  \nAppendix C: 2019 Teacher Survey Training Changes from SY2017–2018 ...............................153  \nAppendix D: 2019 Teacher Survey Financial Awards Changes from SY2017–2018.................154  \nAppendix E: 2019 Teacher Survey Preferences for Additional Tools and Materials..................155  \nAppendix F: 2019 Teacher Survey CRP Impact on AP Enrollment ...........................................156  \nAppendix G: 2019 PSD Survey Comments about CRP Matching Expectations ........................157  \nAppendix H: 2019 PSD Survey Comments on CRP Impact on School ......................................159  \nAppendix I: 2019 PSD Survey Factors that Affected CRP Implementation ...............................161  \nAppendix J: 2019 SC Survey Suggestions for Improving SSS Attendance ................................162  \nAppendix K: 2019 SC Survey Factors that Hindered or Assisted CRP Implementation ............164  \n2017–2019 IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL MATH AND SCIENCE INITIATIVE’S COLLEGE READINESS PROGRAM  \nJulia Phelan, Jeffrey Egger, Junok Kim, Kilchan Choi, Eunhee Keum, Gregory K. W. K. Chung,  \nand Eva L. Baker  \nCRESST/University of California, Los Angeles  \nExecutive Summary  \nThe National Math + Science Initiative (NMSI) is a nonprofit organization committed to improving educational outcomes that t","cbCaikNhH4O2eIiI","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikNhH4O2eIiI","pdf",3829703,167,"English","# Executive Summary\n# Introduction\n# Program Description\n# Research Questions\n# Results for the Impact Study\n# Results for Implementation Evaluation\n# Summary\n# References\n## Appendix A: Propensity Score Matching Results\n## Appendix B: Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model\n## Appendix C: 2019 Teacher Survey Training Changes from SY2017–2018\n## Appendix D: 2019 Teacher Survey Financial Awards Changes from SY2017–2018\n## Appendix E: 2019 Teacher Survey Preferences for Additional Tools and Materials\n## Appendix F: 2019 Teacher Survey CRP Impact on AP Enrollment","[{\"question\":\"What is the College Readiness Program (CRP) and what does it aim to improve?\",\"answer\":\"CRP is designed to support STEM-focused high school success, particularly in English, mathematics, and science AP courses, with attention to students traditionally underrepresented in those AP classes.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the CRP impact evaluated in this report?\",\"answer\":\"CRESST used a randomized cluster trial with CRP and comparison schools across 10 states and analyzed AP exam data using a two-level hierarchical generalized linear model (students nested within schools).\"},{\"question\":\"What do the results indicate about AP exam participation in program schools versus comparison schools?\",\"answer\":\"The analyses show statistically significant increases in the probability of taking an AP exam in program schools, with effects reported as higher in 2018 and even greater in 2019.\"}]","2017–2019 Implementation Evaluation of the National Math and Science Initiative’s College Readiness Program - Deliverable - March 30, 2021 | PDF",1792055369,421]